Development by "simple consensus" of a tool to assist the activation of the helicopter at SAMU 14 / Élaboration par méthode du consensus simple d'un outil d'aide au déclenchement d'un hélicoptère au SAMU 14

The main objective of this work was to develop a tool to assist the activation of a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) for the SAMU 14. We opted for a methodology based on "guidelines of good professional practice." Simple consensus was used. A multidisciplinary working group (pilots, medical regulation assistants, doctors) was created. Subgroup meetings (pilots, medical regulation assistants, doctors) developed subparts of the tool. The assembly of the tool's subparts was reviewed by the working group and then by an independent reading group. This work enabled the consensual creation of a tool to support the use of the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) for the SAMU 14. It is composed of maps, a protocol, and a written procedure of activation. This methodology by "simple consensus" allowed the development of a tool rationalizing the activation of the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) for the SAMU 14. It was the first work of this type within the SAMU 14. This simple and transposable methodology could be used in other emergency centers or for other multidisciplinary protocols.

L'objectif principal de ce travail était la création d'un outil d'aide au déclenchement d'un SMUR héliporté au SAMU 14. Nous avons opté pour une méthodologie type « recommandations de bonnes pratiques professionnelles ¼ (RBPP). Le consensus simple a été utilisé. Un groupe de travail multidisciplinaire (pilotes, assistant de régulation médicale [ARM], médecins) a été créé. Des réunions en sous-groupe (pilote, ARM et médecins) ont permis d'élaborer des sous-parties de l'outil. L'assemblage des sous-parties de l'outil a été relu par le groupe de travail puis par un groupe de lecture autonome et validé en réunion de service. Ce travail a permis la création consensuelle d'un outil d'aide à l'emploi du vecteur héliporté en SMUR primaire au sein du SAMU 14. Il est composé de cartes, d'une fiche réflexe et d'une procédure écrite de déclenchement. Cette méthodologie par consensus simple a permis la création d'un outil rationalisant le déclenchement du vecteur héliporté pour le SAMU 14. Il s'agissait du premier travail de ce type au SAMU 14. Cette méthodologie simple et transposable pourrait être utilisée dans d'autres centres 15 ou pour d'autres protocoles multidisciplinaires.

Élaboration par méthode du consensus simple d'un outil d'aide au déclenchement d'un hélicoptère au SAMU 14.

The main objective of this work was to develop a tool to assist the activation of a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) for the SAMU 14. We opted for a methodology based on "guidelines of good professional practice." Simple consensus was used. A multidisciplinary working group (pilots, medical regulation assistants, doctors) was created. Subgroup meetings (pilots, medical regulation assistants, doctors) developed subparts of the tool. The assembly of the tool's subparts was reviewed by the working group and then by an independent reading group. This work enabled the consensual creation of a tool to support the use of the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) for the SAMU 14. It is composed of maps, a protocol, and a written procedure of activation. This methodology by "simple consensus" allowed the development of a tool rationalizing the activation of the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) for the SAMU 14. It was the first work of this type within the SAMU 14. This simple and transposable methodology could be used in other emergency centers or for other multidisciplinary protocols.

FRENCH versus ESI: comparison between two nurse triage emergency scales with referent scenarios.

OBJECTIVES: Acute triage is needed to prioritize care and achieve optimal resource allocation in busy emergency departments. The main objective is to compare the FRench Emergency Nurse Classification in Hospital scale (FRENCH) to the American scale Emergency Severity Index (ESI). Secondary objectives are to compare for each scale the over and under-triage, the triage matching to the gold standard and the inter-individual sorting reproducibility between the nurses. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study conducting among the nursing staffs and nursing students, selected from Caen University College Hospital and Lisieux Hospital Center emergency departments between two months. Each group individually rank 60 referent clinical cases composed by scales designers. An assessment of scale practicality is collected after for each tool. The collected parameters are analyzed by a Cohen kappa concordance test (κ). RESULTS: With 8151 triage results of gold standard scenarios sorting in two scales by the same nurses, the FRENCH scale seems to give better triage results than the US ESI scale (nurse: FRENCH 60% and ESI 53%, p = 0.003 ; nursing students: FRENCH 49% and ESI 42%, p < 0.001). In the two groups ESI has also a big tendency to under-sort (p = 0.01), particularly for the most severe patients (p < 0.01). The interobserver sorting concordance for any experience gives good results for the FRENCH and the ESI without any difference (nurses : FRENCH KPQ=0.72 ESI KPQ=0.78; p = 0.32 ; students KPQ=0.44 KPQ=0.55; p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: The ESI and FRENCH scales comparison on 8151 sorting results shows direct validity in favor of FRENCH one and similar interobserver agreement for both scales.

Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial.

BACKGROUND: With a survival rate of 6 to 11%, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a healthcare challenge with room for improvement in morbidity and mortality. The guidelines emphasize the highest possible quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and chest compressions (CC). It is essential to minimize CC interruptions, and therefore increase the chest compression fraction (CCF), as this is an independent factor for survival. Survival is significantly and positively correlated with the suitability of CCF targets, CC frequency, CC depth, and brief predefibrillation pause. CC guidance improves adherence to recommendations and allows closer alignment with the CC objectives. The possibility of improving CCF by lengthening the time between two CC relays and the effect of real-time feedback on the quality of the CC must be investigated. METHODS: Using a 2 × 2 factorial design in a multicenter randomized trial, two hypotheses will be tested simultaneously: (i) a 4-min relay rhythm improves the CCF (reducing the no-flow time) compared to the currently recommended 2-min relay rate, and (ii) a guiding tool improves the quality of CC. Primary outcomes (i) CCF and (ii) correct compression score will be recorded by a real-time feedback device. Five hundred adult nontraumatic OHCAs will be included over 2 years. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 distribution receiving advanced CPR as follows: 2-min blind, 2 min with guidance, 4-min blind, or 4 min with guidance. Secondary outcomes are the depth, frequency, and release of CC; length (care, no-flow, and low-flow); rate of return of spontaneous circulation; characteristics of advanced CPR; survival at hospital admission; survival and neurological state on days 1 and 30 (or intensive care discharge); and dosage of neuron-specific enolase on days 1 and 3. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to assessing the impact of real-time feedback on CC quality in practical conditions of OHCA resuscitation. It will also provide insight into the feasibility of extending the relay rhythm between two rescuers from the currently recommended 2 to 4 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03817892 . Registered on 28 January 2019.