RESUMEN
The impact of divergent selection based on the ultimate pH (pHu) of pectoralis major (P. major) muscle on the chemical, biochemical, and histological profiles of the muscle and sensorial quality of meat was investigated in broiler chickens. The protein, lipid, DM, glycogen and lactate content, glycolytic potential, proteolysis, lipid and protein oxidation index, muscle fiber cross-sectional area, capillary density, and collagen surface were determined on the breast P. major muscle of 6-wk-old broilers issued from the high-pHu (pHu+) and low-pHu (pHu-) lines. Sensory attributes were also evaluated on the breast (roasted or grilled) and thigh (roasted) meat of the 2 lines. Protein, lipid, and DM content of P. major muscle were not affected by selection ( > 0.05). However, the P. major muscle of the pHu+ line was characterized by lower residual glycogen (-16%; ≤ 0.001) and lactate (-14%; ≤ 0.001) content and lower glycolytic potential (-14%; ≤ 0.001) compared with the pHu- line. Although the average cross-sectional area of muscle fibers and surface occupied by collagen were similar ( > 0.05) in both lines, fewer capillaries per fiber (-15%; ≤ 0.05) were observed in the pHu+ line. The pHu+ line was also characterized by lower lipid oxidation (thiobarbituric acid reactive substance index: -23%; ≤ 0.05) but protein oxidation and proteolysis index were not different ( > 0.05) between the 2 lines. At the sensory level, selection on breast muscle pHu mainly affected the texture of grilled and roast breast meat, which was judged significantly more tender ( ≤ 0.001) in the pHu+ line, and the acid taste, which was less pronounced in the roasted breast meat of the pHu+ line ( ≤ 0.002). This study highlighted that selection based on pHu does not affect the chemical composition and structure of breast meat. However, by modifying muscle blood supply and glycogen turnover, it affects meat acidity and oxidant status, both of which are likely to contribute to the large differences in texture observed between the 2 lines.
Asunto(s)
Carne/análisis , Selección Genética , Animales , Pollos/genética , Pollos/metabolismo , Glucógeno/análisis , Glucólisis , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Ácido Láctico , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismoRESUMEN
Avian uncoupling protein (avUCP) is orthologous to UCP3, which is suggested to be involved in fatty acid metabolism and to limit the mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species in mammals. In the chicken, the role and regulation of avUCP remain to be clarified. The aim of this study was to explore the control of avUCP expression by the beta-adrenergic system, known to be involved in avian thermoregulation and lipid utilization, and in UCP expression in mammals. Therefore, we measured the expression of avUCP mRNA and protein in the Pectoralis major muscle of chickens injected with the beta(2) agonist isoproterenol, and we investigated the potential pathways involved in the regulation of avUCP mRNA expression. Avian UCP mRNA expression was increased 7-fold 4h after isoproterenol injection, leading to a tendency to a 40% increase in avUCP protein 24h post-injection. This increase was preceded, 30 min after isoproterenol injection, by changes in the chicken thyroid status and in the muscular expression of PPARalpha, PPARbeta/delta, and PPARgamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha). Moreover, the analysis of the avUCP promoter sequence suggested potential binding sites for PPARs and for thyroid hormone receptors. We also detected the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase, which has recently been reported to be involved in UCP3 regulation in mammals. This study presents for the first time evidence of beta-adrenergic control on avUCP messenger expression in chicken muscle and suggests the potential involvement of AMPK and several transcription factors in this regulation.
Asunto(s)
Pollos , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/fisiología , Canales Iónicos/genética , Proteínas Mitocondriales/genética , Receptores Adrenérgicos beta/fisiología , Desacopladores , Proteínas Quinasas Activadas por AMP/metabolismo , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacología , Animales , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Canales Iónicos/análisis , Isoproterenol/farmacología , Masculino , Proteínas Mitocondriales/análisis , Músculo Esquelético/química , Receptores Activados del Proliferador del Peroxisoma/genética , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas/genética , ARN Mensajero/análisis , Hormonas Tiroideas/sangre , Factores de Transcripción/genéticaRESUMEN
The present study was aimed at evaluating the molecular mechanisms associated with the differences in muscle glycogen content and breast meat quality between 2 experimental lines of chicken divergently selected on abdominal fatness. The glycogen at death (estimated through the glycolytic potential) of the pectoralis major muscle and the quality of the resulting meat were estimated in the 2 lines. The fat chickens exhibited greater glycolytic potential, and in turn lower ultimate pH than the lean chickens. Consequently, the breast meat of fat birds was paler and less colored (i.e., less red and yellow), and exhibited greater drip loss compared with that of lean birds. In relation to these variations, transcription and activation levels of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) were investigated. The main difference observed between lines was a 3-fold greater level of AMPK activation, evaluated through phosphorylation of AMPKalpha-(Thr(172)), in the muscle of lean birds. At the transcriptional level, data indicated concomitant down- and upregulation for the gamma1 and gamma2 AMPK subunit isoforms, respectively, in the muscle of lean chickens. Transcriptional levels of enzymes directly involved in glycogen turnover were also investigated. Data showed greater gene expression for glycogen synthase, glycogen phosphorylase, and the gamma subunit of phosphorylase kinase in lean birds. Together, these data indicate that selection on body fatness in chicken alters the muscle glycogen turnover and content and consequently the quality traits of the resulting meat. Alterations of AMPK activity could play a key role in these changes.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Quinasas Activadas por AMP/metabolismo , Pollos/fisiología , Glucógeno/metabolismo , Carne/normas , Músculos Pectorales , Tejido Adiposo/metabolismo , Animales , Western Blotting , Peso Corporal , Pollos/metabolismo , Fluorescencia , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Glucógeno Fosforilasa/genética , Glucógeno Sintasa/genética , Músculos Pectorales/enzimología , Músculos Pectorales/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/metabolismoRESUMEN
In chickens, insulin injection leads to the activation of the early steps of insulin receptor signaling in liver but not in muscles. Paradoxically, muscle p70 S6 kinase (S6K1), a kinase controlling protein synthesis and growth, was markedly activated in response to insulin. The aim of this study was to further investigate S6K1 regulation and activation using chickens divergently selected for growth, i.e. fast- (FGL) and slow- (SGL) growing lines. In the Pectoralis major muscle, insulin stimulated S6K1 phosphorylation on T389 in FGL and SGL chickens, whereas S6K1 phosphorylation on T421/S424 was increased by insulin only in FGL chickens. Moreover, insulin-related increase in muscle S6K1 activity was greater in FGL chickens than in SGL chickens. Surprisingly, liver S6K1 was insulin insensitive in the two genotypes. Such difference of regulation between tissues and between genotypes was not observed for the protein kinase B, which is involved in insulin signaling upstream of S6K1, or for eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein. Interestingly, insulin-activated a S6K1 downstream target, the ribosomal protein S6, irrespective of tissue, suggesting that a pathway different of the S6K1 cascade may be involved in S6 phosphorylation in chicken liver. In conclusion, the regulation of S6K1 differs between the liver and muscle and between chickens divergently selected for growth. Our results suggest a potential involvement of S6K1 in the control of muscle growth and an open issue concerning S6K1 function in chicken liver.