Gender differences in central serous chorioretinopathy based on the new multimodal imaging classification.

PURPOSE: To analyse the gender-specific differences in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) based on a new multimodal imaging classification system. METHOD: This was a retrospective, multicentric, longitudinal, observational study in patients with a diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral CSCR. Visual acuity outcomes and differences based on 'Simple' and 'Complex' CSCR were analysed. The occurrence of choroidal neovascularization (CNVM) and number of recurrences were also compared. Regression analysis was used to evaluate baseline predictors of final visual acuity. RESULTS: The study included 109 eyes of 58 patients (55 eyes of 28 female patients and 54 eyes of 30 male patients). Simple CSCR was seen in 8 (14.8%) eyes and 21 (38.2%) eyes in male and female groups respectively, while complex CSCR was seen in 46 (85.2%) eyes and 34 (61.8%) eyes in male and female groups respectively (p = 0.005). Recurrence was more commonly seen in males (34 eyes) than in females (23 eyes) (p = 0.03). Males (96.7%) were also significantly more likely to have a bilateral presentation (78.6% in females) (p = 0.03). Conversely, CNVM was more commonly seen in female eyes (8 eyes) than male eyes (4 eyes) (p = 0.23). On multivariable regression analysis, factors affecting reduced need for treatment were history of steroid use, good visual acuity at baseline, and simple CSCR. Factors affecting good final visual acuity were history of steroid use, good visual acuity at baseline, and younger age. CONCLUSION: Males tended to have complex CSCR and recurrence compared to the female sub-group, while females exhibited CNVM more commonly than males.

Ten-year follow-up and sequential evaluation of multifocal retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities in central serous chorioretinopathy.

PURPOSE: The study aims to analyze the 10-year outcomes in "simple" and "complex" central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) and to evaluate the longitudinal changes in multifocal retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentric, longitudinal, observational study in patients with a diagnosis of CSCR. Visual acuity outcomes and recurrence characteristics of simple and complex were analyzed. Changes in number of foci of RPE alterations from baseline to last visit were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 235 eyes screened, the study included 67 eyes of 39 patients (32 males and 7 females) with CSCR (12 simple and 55 complex CSCR). A total of 17 (29.9%) eyes had a unifocal RPE alteration, while the remaining 50 had multifocal RPE alterations at baseline. In eyes with complex CSCR, the 10-year visual acuity was significantly worse (p < 0.001), more number of eyes required treatment (p = 0.03), higher number of RPE alterations were present at baseline and last follow-up (p < 0.001 for both), and number of recurrences were higher (p < 0.001), than simple CSCR. Focal collections of RPE alterations and leakage site corresponded to mid-phase hyper-fluorescent plaques (MPHP) in all eyes. On multivariate regression analysis, a larger area of RPE alteration was associated with a worser 10-year visual acuity (p = 0.004) and complex CSCR was associated with higher number of recurrence (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: A different course of disease progression was seen in simple and complex CSCR. An evolution in foci of RPE alterations was seen, from a simple area of MPHP, to focal RPE alterations and finally to leakage.