Allium Ureteral Stent as a Treatment for Ureteral Stricture: Results and Concerns.

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral strictures could be a chronic illness that leads to severe side effects and poor quality of life. A treatment with an Allium ureteral stent (URS), a self-expanding, large-caliber URS, was implemented in our department for ureteral stricture. Our study aim was to report the long-term results, including success rate, complications, and adverse effects. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on all patients who were treated with an Allium URS in our department between January 2017 and January 2021. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and perioperative parameters were retrieved and analyzed. The primary outcome was stricture resolution rates following stent removal. RESULTS: Our cohort included 17 patients, 9 men and 8 women. The etiology of ureteral strictures was urolithiasis in 76.5% and pelvic procedure injury in 17.6%. The overall success rate was 35.29% in an average follow-up of 10.42 ± 2.39 months after stent removal. A higher failure rate was observed in the urolithiasis etiology group (90% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.38). The mean indwelling time of the Allium stent was 14.29 ± 1.29 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although an Allium URS could be considered as a feasible and attractive treatment of ureteral strictures, due to its minimal invasiveness, the success rate of this treatment is relatively low. Therefore, this option should be carefully considered and should be discouraged in young and fit patients and reserved for older unfit patients who are unwilling to undergo surgical repair of ureteral strictures.

Novel nanotech antioxidant cocktail prevents medical diagnostic procedures ionizing radiation effects.

Ionizing radiation (IR) exposure results in oxidative damage causing cytotoxic and genotoxic effects. Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered the most significant DNA lesions induced by ionizing radiation. The present study evaluates the radio protective effect of a novel antioxidant cocktail through quantification of DSB in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) in vivo. The study included 16 consecutive patients who were divided into 2 groups, 6 patients received the novel antioxidant cocktail and 10 control patients. Blood samples were drawn from the patients undergoing bone scan, before the injection of the 99mTc MDP tracer and 2 h after the injection. Quantification of the IR damage was done by Immunofluorescence analysis of the phosphorylated histone, γ-H2AX, used to monitor DSB induction and repair in PBL. The radiation effect of the control group was measured by 2 variables, the average DBSs foci per nucleus and the percent of the DSB bearing cells in PBL. The findings showed a significant increase in the DSBs after isotope injection with an average increment of 0.29 ± 0.13 of foci/nucleus and 17.07% ± 7.68 more DSB bearing cells (p < 0.05). The cocktail treated group showed a lower difference average of - 2.79% ± 6.13 DSB bearing cells. A paired t-test revealed a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.005) confirming the cocktail's protective effect. The novel anti-oxidant treatment decreases the oxidative stress-induced DNA damage and can be considered as a preventative treatment before radiation exposure.

The Use of Tissue Adhesive for Tumor Bed Closure during Partial Nephrectomy is Associated with Reduced Devascularized Functional Volume Loss.

OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively compare the functional renal volume loss, following nephron sparing surgery (NSS) between patients in whom tumor bed closure was done by biological tissue adhesive and those who were managed by standard suture technique. METHODS: From our institutional NSS database we retrospectively collected patients who had two sequential quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography of 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid uptake studies, the first study immediately before surgery and the second one 3-6 months following surgery. The study group included 69 patients: 26 (37.7%) patients in the sealant group (BioGlue®) and 43 (62.3%) patients in the standard suture group. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted in the baseline clinical and pathological characteristics of the studied groups. However, there were several statistically significant differences in operative variables: patients in the suture group had larger amount of blood loss (3-fold), longer ischemia time (26.6 vs. 21 minutes,) and slightly longer operation time. Patients in whom tumor bed was closed by sutures had nearly 3-fold higher parenchymal loss compared to patients managed by sealant (26.28 vs. 8.92 ml, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The use of tissue sealant during tumor bed reconstruction is associated with reduced devascularized parenchymal mass loss and should be considered among modifiable surgical factors during NSS.

Histopathologic Differences between Jewish and Arab Population in Israel at First-Time Presentation with Bladder Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pathology of urothelial carcinoma may vary in different populations at diagnosis. Our aim was to evaluate the histopathologic differences between Jewish and Arab patients in Israel at first diagnosis of urothelial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of all patients with confirmed urothelial cancer, treated at our department between January 2010 and January 2015. We examined the distribution of the histopathologic data among the studied populations. To compare the categorical variables we used the Chi-Square Pearson test. Comparison of independent variables was made by Student's t-test. P value below 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The study group included 413 patients, 345 Jews and 68 Arabs. The major differences were that Arab patients were younger (62.61 versus 68.55 years, P = 0.001), had more aggressive tumors that were detected at a more advanced stage, and had also a higher rate of metastatic disease (7.4% versus 3.2%, P = 0.05). Nonurothelial cell tumors were 2.3 times more prevalent in Arab population. Unlike Jewish population, Arab women had higher rate of invasive/metastatic disease compared with Arab men (40% versus 22.4%). CONCLUSION: At time of diagnosis the tumors were more aggressive in Arab patients, especially in Arab women. The reasons for those differences constitute a target for a separate research. These results should have an impact on prevention medicine and education of physicians treating mixed populations.

Nephron Sparing Surgery for Renal Mass: Is There Any Difference between Oncocytoma and Malignant Lesions.

INTRODUCTION: A relatively high proportion of patients who undergo partial or radical nephrectomy for enhancing renal mass actually have oncocytoma, a benign renal tumor. Several parameters have been shown to be typical for oncocytoma, but only a small number of patients present with these parameters. The aim of our study was to report the clinical, operative and postoperative characteristics of patients who underwent nephron-sparing surgery in our center with a histopathological diagnosis of oncocytoma compared to patients with malignant renal tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three out of 530 patients who underwent nephron-sparing surgery for enhancing renal mass were diagnosed with oncocytoma. Clinical and radiological features and operational data of these patients were compared with patients who had malignant renal tumors. RESULTS: Mean age of patients with histologically proven non-malignant oncocytoma was significantly higher than that in patients with malignant renal cell carcinoma (66.7 vs. 61.4 years). All other analyzed variables showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: No reliable clinical, operative or radiological parameters can differentiate preoperatively between oncocytoma and malignant renal neoplasms.

The natural history and predictors for intervention in patients with small renal mass undergoing active surveillance.

Aim. To describe the natural history of small renal mass on active surveillance and identify parameters that could help in predicting the need for intervention in patients with small renal masses undergoing active surveillance. We also discuss the need for renal biopsy in the management of these patients. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 78 renal masses ≤4 cm diagnosed at our Urology Department at Bnai Zion Medical Center between September 2003 and March 2012. Results. Seventy patients with 78 small renal masses were analyzed. The mean age at diagnosis was 68 years (47-89). The mean follow-up period was 34 months (12-112). In 54 of 78 masses there was a growth of at least 2 mm between imaging on last available follow-up and diagnosis. Eight of the 54 (15%) masses which grew in size underwent a nephron-sparing surgery, of which two were oncocytomas and six were renal cell carcinoma. Growth rate and mass diameter on diagnosis were significantly greater in the group of patients who underwent a surgery. Conclusions. Small renal masses might eventually be managed by active surveillance without compromising survival or surgical approach. All masses that were eventually excised underwent a nephron-sparing surgery. None of the patients developed metastases.

Limited field noncontrast computerized tomography for followup of ureteral stones: initial results.

PURPOSE: Due to high specificity and sensitivity noncontrast computerized tomography is increasingly used to diagnose and follow patients with ureteral stones. We evaluated the feasibility of limited field noncontrast computerized tomography to follow patients with ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in the study were 71 patients who underwent diagnostic and followup noncontrast computerized tomography due to ureteral stones. According to stone position on the first diagnostic scan a limited field batch from the followup scan was formed and examined by an independent radiologist. Radiation doses and rates of potentially missed findings in the batch were compared to those of the full followup noncontrast scan. RESULTS: Average full followup noncontrast computerized tomography length was 46.5 cm and average batch length was 20.7 and 13.8 cm for proximal and distal stones, respectively. The average full followup noncontrast scan radiation dose was 12.2 mSv. Average batch doses were 6.1 and 4.1 mSv for proximal and distal stones, respectively (p = 0.002), resulting in a radiation exposure reduction of 48.8% for proximal stones and 66% for distal stones. In 3 cases additional clinical information (not including hydronephrosis) was missed when relying only on batch images. This additional information did not impact further urological treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Limited field noncontrast computerized tomography is a feasible option for following patients diagnosed with ureteral stones. It may lead to significantly lower radiation exposure.