Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; : 10781552231167812, 2023 Apr 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37021460

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is a vasculitic inflammation against blood vessels. Various anticancer therapies can cause vasculitis, but capecitabine-induced LCV is an unusual entity. Here, we describe an LCV case associated with neoadjuvant capecitabine use for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). CASE REPORT: A 70-year-old man presented with rectal bleeding. A colonoscopic biopsy revealed rectal adenocarcinoma and he was diagnosed with LARC after imaging studies. Capecitabine plus radiation therapy was started as a neoadjuvant treatment. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Seven days after the first capecitabine dose, the patient was admitted with a rash. The LCV diagnosis was histopathologically proven. Capecitabine was withheld. After the patient's rash began to regress under corticosteroid pressure, capecitabine was started at a lower dose. His treatment was completed successfully with oral corticosteroids plus low-dose capecitabine. DISCUSSION: We aimed to point out a rare and unusual adverse effect of a frequently used drug in oncologic practice.

2.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 136, 2023 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36765293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). METHODS: A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. RESULTS: The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0-14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9-6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8-7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6-6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5-8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5-4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. CONCLUSION: Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Everolimus , Receptor ErbB-2/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Fulvestrant/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos
4.
Indian J Nephrol ; 32(2): 168-171, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35603117

RESUMEN

TAFRO (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, renal dysfunction, and organomegaly) syndrome is a subtype of Castleman's disease and has been described in recent years. In this case, a middle-aged woman was admitted to our clinic with a 2-week history of fever, weakness, cough, shortness of breath and edema all over the body. Physical examination on admission revealed pale conjunctiva, tachycardia, coarse crackles over left lower lung fields, pitting edema in the extremities, tense ascites, axillar, and bilateral inguinal lymph nodes measuring less than 2 cm. Inguinal lymph node excisional biopsy was compatible with TAFRO syndrome. We started corticosteroid treatment. The patient's general condition and physical findings improved. Laboratory values returned to normal limits. This case will help understand the clinical course and treatment strategy in TAFRO syndrome.

5.
J Investig Med ; 70(3): 814-819, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34740945

RESUMEN

A well-known effect size (ES) indicator is Cohen's d. Cohen defined d measures of small, medium, and large ES as 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively. This approach has been criticized because practical and clinical importance depends on the context of research. The aim of the study was to examine physicians' perception of ES using iron deficiency anemia treatment as an example and observing the effects of pretreatment level and duration of treatment on the magnitude of ES. We prepared a questionnaire describing four different clinical studies: (1) 1 month of treatment of anemia in a group of patients with a mean hemoglobin (Hb) of 10 g/dL; (2) 3 months of treatment at an Hb level of 10 g/dL; (3) 1 month of treatment at an Hb level of 8 g/dL; and (4) 3 months of treatment at an Hb level of 8 g/dL. In each scenario, respondents were required to evaluate six various levels of Hb improvement as being very small, small, medium, large, or very large effect: 0.1 g/dL, 0.3 g/dL, 0.7 g/dL, 1.1 g/dL, 1.7 g/dL, and 2.8 g/dL. The responses of 35 physicians were evaluated. For 10 mg/dL, the Cohen's d for small, medium, and large ES was 0.5, 0.8, and 1.2 respectively, for 1 month of treatment. In terms of 3 months of treatment, the Cohen's d was 0.8, 1.2, and 2, respectively. Two separate pretreatment Hb levels (8 g/dL and 10 g/dL) demonstrated a minor difference. Determination of ES during the planning phase of studies requires thorough evaluation of specific clinical cases. Our results are divergent from the classic Cohen's d values. Additionally, duration of treatment affects ES perception.


Asunto(s)
Anemia , Médicos , Hemoglobinas , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes ; 129(5): 349-356, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31958848

RESUMEN

It is recommended that adrenal incidentaloma patients should be monitored for radiological changes, increase in size and new functionality that may occur in the future, even if they are benign and nonfunctional at the initial evaluation. Our aim is to evaluate the key clinical characteristics of adrenal incidentaloma patients focusing on changes during follow-up and associated clinical outcomes. A total of 755 patients (median age: 56 years), with an adrenal incidentaloma > 1 cm and underwent functionality tests, were included in the study. Clinical characteristics, functionality status and follow-up durations were recorded. During the course of follow-up, any changes in size and development of new functionality, and clinical consequences thereof were evaluated. In 71.8% of patients, incidentalomas were non-functional. Most frequent functionality (15.8%, n=119) was subclinical hypercortisolemia (SH) [10.9% (n=82) possible autonomous cortisol secretion (PACS) and 4.9% (n=37) autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS)] of all incidentalomas. Frequencies of Cushing's syndrome (CS), pheochromacytoma and primary hyperaldosteronism were 4.9% (n=37), 3.8% (n=29) and 3.7% (n=28), respectively. Adrenocortical carcinoma frequency was 1.5% (n=11). Of 755 patients, 43% (n=325) were followed up regularly more than 6 months. Median follow-up duration was 24 months (6-120). A total of 17 (5.2%) patients, which had non-functional incidentalomas at baseline had developed new functionality during follow-up, of which 15 (4.6%) were SH [13 patients (4%) PACS and 2 patients (0.6%) ACS] and 2 (0.6%) were CS. During follow-up, 24% (n=78) of the patients had an increase in mass size between 5-9 mm, while 11.7% (n=38) of the patients had an increase of ≥10 mm. During follow-up, 4% (n=13) of the patients developed a new lesion with a diameter ≥10 mm on the opposite side. In patients with a follow-up duration of more than 2 years, frequencies of size increase and new lesion emerging at the opposite adrenal gland were higher. 14 patients (4.3% of the patients with regular follow-up) underwent surgery due to increase in size or development of new functionality during follow-up. Our study demonstrated that a necessity for surgery may arise due to increase in size and development of functionality during follow-up period in adrenal incidentaloma patients, and thus continuing patient follow-up, even with wider intervals, will be appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/patología , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
Leuk Res ; 45: 82-9, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27107658

RESUMEN

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of azacitidine and decitabine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A total of 88 patients diagnosed with refractory anemia with excess blast (RAEB) treated with azacitidine (n=57) or decitabine (n=31) were evaluated. Comparisons between azacitidine and decitabine groups were performed in the whole cohort, and in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort in order to reduce the simple selection bias. Patients who received azacitidine or decitabine had comparable overall response rates in both the unmatched (49.1% vs. 64.5%, p=0.166) and the propensity-matched cohorts (52% vs. 68%, p=0.248). The cumulative incidence of AML transformation at one year was comparable between azacitidine and decitabine in the unmatched (24.0% vs. 31.3%, p=0.26) and in the propensity-matched cohorts (18.7% vs. 31.5%, p=0.11). There was no difference in terms of transfusion requirement, febrile neutropenia episodes or the need for antifungal use during the treatment cycles in the propensity-matched cohort. The median overall survival was 20.4 months for azacitidine and 16.8 months for decitabine (p=0.59). Finally, we found that at least a four-cycle treatment with any HMA was a favorable factor. In conclusion, both azacitidine and decitabine have similar efficacy and toxicity profiles in the treatment of MDS-RAEB.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Refractaria con Exceso de Blastos/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Azacitidina/análogos & derivados , Azacitidina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anemia Refractaria con Exceso de Blastos/complicaciones , Anemia Refractaria con Exceso de Blastos/mortalidad , Anemia Refractaria con Exceso de Blastos/patología , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Azacitidina/efectos adversos , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/estadística & datos numéricos , Transformación Celular Neoplásica , Decitabina , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Selección de Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...