Depressive symptoms during and after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer are extraordinarily susceptible to depressive traits. Thus, a general screening of these patients at their first admission to the ital is desirable. METHODS: From 1997-2001, 133 patients with head and neck tumors filled in the Self-Rating-Depression-Scale (SDS) at the beginning and end of radiotherapy (ti1/ti2), 6 weeks, and 6 months after radiotherapy (ti3/ti4). RESULTS.: The SDS index increased significantly from 46.44 (ti1) to 48.91(ti2) (p =.025) and then remained stable. The subdomain "somatic-eating-related symptoms" at ti1 was significantly lower than ti2 (p <.001). In contrast to inpatients, outpatients and those with conventional instead of hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy were less impaired by eating-related symptoms. Patients with higher education showed a lower SDS index and cognitive scale. Marital status, tumor stage, histologic grading, and substance abuse had no influence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a higher risk of depression should receive long-term monitoring during and after the end of radiotherapy, and prompt intervention strategies should be applied.

[Psychometric properties of the Stress Index RadioOncology (SIRO)--a new questionnaire measuring quality of life of cancer patients during radiotherapy]. / Psychometrische Eigenschaften des Stress Index RadioOnkologie (SIRO)--ein neuer Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität bei Patienten unter Strahlentherapie.

PURPOSE: In the course of radiotherapy oncological patients often experience considerable psychosocial distress. For its measurement however, no specific questionnaire is available. The Stress Index RadioOncology (SIRO), which is based upon the results of extensive preliminary studies, will be made available as a screening-instrument to facilitate measurement of psychosocial distress of cancer patients, including radiotherapy-induced distress. The aim of this study is, to psychometrically evaluate the preliminary version of the questionnaire, to transfer it to the final version (SIRO) and to gain information about the psychosocial distress of radiooncological patients at the beginning of radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 104 cancer patients (18 to 85 years) with different diagnoses have been included in the study (Table 1). The data have been assessed by means of the preliminary version of the new questionnaire SIRO, the HADS, EORTC QLQ-C30 and LS. With 25 patients semistructured clinical interviews have been conducted. RESULTS: The requirements for reliability (Table 3) and validity (Table 4) of the SIRO have either been fulfilled or exceeded. The highest distress value has been found in the scale "Psycho-physical Distress", followed by the scale "Partnership Problems", "Radiotherapeutical Distress", and "Information Deficits" (Figure 1). On the item level, the highest distress was experienced due to reduction of efficiency and anxiety (Table 2). With regard to the radiotherapy items, patients were most distressed by fears of possible side effects and by the fact of being irradiated. Patients with palliative treatment option were higher distressed than those with curative treatment (Table 5). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary version of the new self-report questionnaire (SIRO) has proven to be valid, reliable and practicable, and can therefore be taken unchanged to measure the psychosocial distress of radiooncological patients.

Psychosocial stress in cancer patients during and after radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate stress in tumor patients by means of a cancer-specific questionnaire in the course of radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Disease-specific aspects of psychosocial stress (Herschbach's Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients, QSC) were self-assessed by patients with different tumor types before radiotherapy (ti1), after radiotherapy (ti2), and 6 weeks after the end of radiotherapy (ti3). We investigated 265 of 446 patients (157 male, 108 female; median age 58.6 years) with complete data of ti1-ti3. RESULTS: In the course of investigation, the most prominent stress scale of the patients proved to be physical efficiency, without significant changes during treatment and after therapy. Significant increases in stress were observed for anxiety, pain, and information at ti3 (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.035). Women showed significantly higher stress from ti1 to ti3, younger patients displayed a decrease in anxiety, whereas elderly patients demonstrated an increase (p = 0.016). Breast cancer patients had the highest stress levels. The probability of correctly predicting increase in stress (sensitivity) was 78% and the specificity 67%. The relevant predictor variables were tumor stage, addiction to alcohol or nicotine, metabolic disorder, marital status, and age. CONCLUSION: Patients who experienced stress at the beginning of radiotherapy also had the same or increased levels of stress during and shortly after treatment and needed permanent psychosocial support to improve quality of life. The identification of patients with high stress levels at the beginning of therapy could be helpful.

Only sociodemographic variables predict quality of life after radiography in patients with head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: Psychosocial factors influence patient compliance and have an effect on survival. Identifying patients at risk of decreased quality of life (QOL) with no extra expenditure in terms of hospital staff time or resources is mandatory to plan psychosocial support. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1997 and 2000, 242 patients with head-and-neck cancer (30% pharyngeal, 29% oropharyngeal, and 13% laryngeal cancer) were screened. Of these, 28.5% refused to participate and 19.0% were excluded (Karnofsky performance score <50, language and cognitive deficits, death, or noncompliance). A total of 124 patients were assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire at ti1 (beginning of radiotherapy [RT]). Eighty-three patients from this group were examined, with complete data from ti1 to ti3 (6 weeks after RT). RESULTS: The QOL did not change during RT. In logistic regression analysis, medical information, in contrast to sociodemographic variables, turned out to have no influence on the ability to predict low QOL (sensitivity 80% vs. 32%). Four sociodemographic variables were entered in the regression model (children, currently employment, ethanol abuse, level of secondary education) and accounted for 26% of variance in QOL at ti3. CONCLUSION: By routinely obtaining clinical information from the patient's history, patients at risk of low QOL after RT can be identified and could benefit from early psychosocial support.