Theory in Action: Public Health and Community Power Building for Health Equity.

CONTEXT: Within the field of public health, there is growing awareness of how complex social conditions shape health outcomes and the role that power plays in driving health inequities. Despite public health frameworks lifting up the need to tackle power imbalances to advance equity, there is little guidance on how to accomplish this as an integral part of health promotion. OBJECTIVE: This article addresses the need for public health professionals to better understand power and identifies opportunities for shifting power to achieve more equitable outcomes. First, it defines power and community power building. Next, it reviews a pragmatic theoretical framework that organizes power into 3 faces: (1) exercising influence in formal decision-making processes; (2) organizing the decision-making environment; and (3) shaping worldviews about social issues. Finally, it connects each face of power to community power-building practices using concrete examples. IMPLEMENTATION: This article highlights real-world case examples to demonstrate how theory translates to action by describing how public health practitioners in government, academic, and nonprofit settings incorporate the 3 faces of power into their work. The case examples illustrate how public health organizations and practitioners can partner with those most impacted by inequities to help shape decision making, agenda setting, and worldviews to influence policy and practice toward more equitable outcomes. DISCUSSION: The public health field can learn from and build on these innovative examples to establish new practices, scale up promising approaches, and evaluate what works to shift power for the greater good.

Cross-Sectoral Collaboration: The State Health Official's Role in Elevating and Promoting Health Equity in All Policies in Minnesota.

CONTEXT: For many years, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has been intentionally engaged in decreasing race- and ethnicity-based health disparities in the state. It has seen modest success in some areas, but overall, the disparities remain. Research over the last several decades has shown that race- and ethnicity-based health disparities are the result of persistent social and economic inequities, which have a greater influence on health outcomes than either individual choices or interventions by the health care system. SETTING: The MDH leaders recognized that to focus health improvement efforts solely on access to health care and individual behavior change (the traditional public health approaches of the last 30 years) would fail to make adequate advances in eliminating health disparities. Working with a statewide group known as the Healthy Minnesota Partnership, MDH decided to shift the public conversations about health in Minnesota to focus on the factors that actually create health. CONCLUSIONS: This effort to develop and implement a new narrative about health, focused on upstream issues such as education, employment, and home ownership, led to an emphasis on health in all policies approach for MDH and its partners. This case example will highlight Minnesota's efforts and discuss the new Council on Institutional Collaboration initiative in partnering large research universities with state health departments in addressing the social determinants of health.

Community organizing practices in a globalizing era: building power for health equity at the community level.

In the postindustrial era, global economic processes have constrained the ability of local agencies, service providers, and civic groups to respond to systemic challenges in public health. Community health psychology can benefit by focusing on interventions through mediating structures that develop innovative methods of leveraging power in the context of globalizing economic forces. Promising methods include careful analysis of power within targeted policy domains and developing strategic alliances with others, so as to exercise social power to affect policy change. The case of ISAIAH, an organizing group based in Minnesota, illustrates innovative avenues for intervention in the context of globalization.