Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 39(5): 659-663, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30856026

RESUMEN

Human papilloma virus infection (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease. It may increase the risk of several cancers, including those of the cervix, vulva, vagina, head and neck. HPV is usually transmitted during sexual intercourse; there are limited data about sexual dysfunction (SD) after infection with this virus. We aimed to measure the incidence of SD in women with HPV. In this study, we evaluated 67 HPV-infected female patients and 66 healthy controls. The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Socio Demographic Form were used for evaluation. Gynaecologists and psychiatrists evaluated the participants. Women with HPV were found to have significantly higher Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) total scores and ASEX sub scores than the control group in the domains of sexual desire, arousal, genital response, orgasmic experience and their satisfaction from orgasm (p ≤ .05). The study group shows a statistically significant difference in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), but Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores show no significant differences between the experimental and control groups. Our study shows that HPV positivity in female patients is associated with a significant impairment in sexual function and that this impairment is not related to depression or anxiety. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? There are only a few studies concerned with sexual dysfunction in HPV patients. These studies have methodological problems, as they do not rule out the effect of depression on sexual dysfunction. It is very difficult to perform studies on sexual dysfunction and sexually transmitted diseases, because both physicians and patients are reluctant to talk about sexual problems. In the present study, only 6 out of 15 physicians accepted to contribute to the study. Although the physicians gave a questionnaire to more than 400 patients, only 133 of them completed that questionnaire. The most important difficulties in this study was to find enough patients. What do the results of this study add? Depression and sexual dysfunction are frequently seen in HPV patients. Although depression is one of the most common causes of sexual dysfunction, an HPV infection may lead to sexual dysfunction even in the patients without depression. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? HPV infections may be associated with mental health problems and sexual dysfunction. The gynaecologists and other clinicians working with HPV patients should also evaluate patients psychologically and refer patients to psychiatry if required. The psychiatric problems associated with an HPV infection do not only impair sexual functions, but also may lead to difficulties in social life.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/virología , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/virología , Adulto , Ansiedad , Cuello del Útero/patología , Cuello del Útero/virología , Coito/fisiología , Coito/psicología , Depresión , Dispareunia/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Orgasmo , Conducta Sexual , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/psicología , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/psicología , Turquía
2.
Hum Reprod ; 30(12): 2912-25, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26466909

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Is there any in vitro evidence for or against ovarian protection by co-administration of a GnRH agonist with chemotherapy in human? SUMMARY ANSWER: The co-administration of GnRH agonist leuprolide acetate with cytotoxic chemotherapy agents does not preserve ovarian reserve in vitro. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Randomized controlled trials of the co-administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with adjuvant chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function have shown contradictory results. This fact, together with the lack of a proven molecular mechanism of action for ovarian protection with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) places this approach as a fertility preservation strategy under scrutiny. We therefore aimed in this study to provide in vitro evidence for or against the role of GnRHa in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced damage in human ovary. STUDY DESIGN, SETTINGS, SIZE AND DURATION: This translational research study of ex vivo and in vitro models of human ovary and granulosa cells was conducted in a university hospital between 2013 and 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Ovarian cortical pieces (n = 15, age 14-37) and mitotic non-luteinized (COV434 and HGrC1) and non-mitotic luteinized human granulosa cells (HLGC) expressing GnRH receptor were used for the experiments. The samples were treated with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, paclitaxel, 5-FU, or TAC combination regimen (docetaxel, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide) with and without GnRHa leuprolide acetate for 24 h. DNA damage, apoptosis, follicle reserve, hormone markers of ovarian function and reserve (estradiol (E2), progesterone (P) and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH)) and the expression of anti-apoptotic genes (bcl-2, bcl-xL, bcl-2L2, Mcl-1, BIRC-2 and XIAP) were compared among control, chemotherapy and chemotherapy + GnRHa groups. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The greatest magnitude of cytotoxicity was observed in the samples treated with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and TAC regimen. Exposure to these drugs resulted in DNA damage, apoptosis and massive follicle loss along with a concurrent decline in the steroidogenic activity of the samples. GnRHa co-administered with chemotherapy agents stimulated its receptors and raised intracellular cAMP levels. But it neither activated anti-apoptotic pathways nor prevented follicle loss, DNA damage and apoptosis induced by these drugs. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our findings do not conclusively rule out the possibility that GnRHa may offer protection, if any, through some other mechanisms in vivo. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: GnRH agonist treatment with chemotherapy does not prevent or ameliorate ovarian damage and follicle loss in vitro. These data can be useful when consulting a young patient who may wish to receive GnRH treatment with chemotherapy to protect her ovaries from chemotherapy-induced damage.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/administración & dosificación , Células de la Granulosa/efectos de los fármacos , Leuprolida/administración & dosificación , Reserva Ovárica/efectos de los fármacos , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Sustancias Protectoras/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Apoptosis/efectos de la radiación , Daño del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Daño del ADN/efectos de la radiación , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Células de la Granulosa/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Reserva Ovárica/efectos de la radiación , Ovario/efectos de la radiación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...