Partial visualization of appendix on ultrasound: What does it mean in the child with suspected appendicitis?

BACKGROUND: Visualization of the entire appendix, including the tip, is thought, but has not been demonstrated, to be important for exclusion of appendicitis by ultrasound. OBJECTIVE: To determine if incomplete visualization of the appendix has negative clinical ramifications including missed appendicitis. METHODS: Under IRB approval we retrospectively reviewed right lower quadrant ultrasound reports from January 2017 to December 2020 to identify examinations with impressions of full visualization of the normal appendix, non-visualization of the appendix with and without secondary findings of appendicitis, and partial visualization of the appendix. Electronic health records were reviewed for follow-up imaging within 48 h, and surgery with pathology reports (if available). RESULTS: 12,193 examinations were included. 4171 (34.2 %) had full visualization of a normal appendix, 5369 (44.0 %) had non-visualization with no secondary findings, and 234 (1.9 %) had non-visualization with secondary findings, The frequencies of appendicitis in these three groups were 34 (0.8 %), 283 (5.3 %), and 127 (54.3 %) respectively. The appendix was partially visualized in 338 (2.8 %) patients with secondary findings present in 53 (15.6 %). Partial visualization without secondary findings had a similar frequency (4.9 %, 14/285) of appendicitis to non-visualized appendix without secondary findings (p = 0.797) and a higher frequency than full visualization of a normal appendix (p < 0.0001). Partial visualization with secondary findings had similar rates (54.7 %, 29/53) to non-visualized appendix with secondary findings (p = 0.953). CONCLUSION: Partial visualization of the appendix with ultrasound (with and without secondary findings) is associated with similar frequencies of appendicitis as non-visualization of appendix (with and without secondary findings).

Implementation of a Program for Appendicitis MRI in a Pediatric Hospital.

MRI is increasingly used as an alternate to CT for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis in pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain, when further imaging is needed after an initial ultrasound examination. The available literature shows a similar diagnostic performance of MRI and CT in this setting. At the authors' institution, to evaluate for appendicitis in children in the ED, MRI is performed using a rapid three-sequence free-breathing protocol without IV contrast media. Implementation of an MRI program for appendicitis in children involves multiple steps, including determination of imaging resource availability, collaboration with other services to develop imaging pathways, widespread educational efforts, and regular quality review. Such programs can face numerous practice-specific challenges, such as those involving scanner capacity, costs, and buy-in of impacted groups. Nonetheless, through careful consideration of these factors, MRI can be used to positively impact the care of children presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis. This Clinical Perspective aims to provide guidance on the development of a program for appendicitis MRI in children, drawing on one institution's experience while highlighting the advantages of MRI and practical strategies for overcoming potential barriers.

Technical and Diagnostic Performance of Rapid MRI for Evaluation of Appendicitis in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Rationale MRI is increasingly used for diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis in the emergency care setting. Scan and room time are important to optimize workflow, especially in situations with limited MRI availability and accessibility. To describe our process to optimize and implement a rapid, non-contrast, free-breathing MRI protocol for appendicitis and to characterize the accuracy for diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initial MRI protocol implemented for suspected appendicitis included five respiratory-triggered axial and coronal single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) and radial T2W sequences with and without fat suppression (FS). This protocol was reassessed based on image quality. Subsequently, the coronal and axial T2W SSFSE FS sequence were removed. A three-sequence exam comprised the rapid MRI appendicitis protocol used for the remainder of the study. All examinations were performed on a 1.5 T scanner. For all examinations, the following information was obtained: scan time, diagnosis of appendicitis (by radiology report), surgery and pathology reports, and alternative diagnoses documented in radiology reports. MRI examination scan durations were compared between the five-sequence and three-sequence protocols, with Mann-Whitney U test, and proportions of false diagnoses were compared to Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: 216 examinations were performed; 21 and 195 performed with five- and three-sequence protocol, respectively. The median duration of the five-sequence protocol was 20 (16.9-23.5) minutes vs.11 (9.5-13) minutes for the three sequence protocol (p < 0.0001). The majority (n = 157, 80.5% of 195) of examinations were performed in a goal time of< 15 min. 23 examinations took longer than 20 min (n = 12, n = 11 for the three- and five-sequence protocols, respectively) were due to repeat sequences or addition of non-standard sequences (requested by interpreting radiologist). 27 (90%) of the 30 reported positive cases were confirmed by pathology. There were three false-positive diagnoses (all three-sequence protocol exams) and one false-negative diagnosis (five-sequence protocol exam). Alternative diagnoses, including pancreatitis, omental infarct, masses, and ovarian pathology, were made in 42 (19%) cases. CONCLUSION: A three-sequence, non-contrast, free- breathing MRI examination can be performed in less than 15 min in the emergency department and has high diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in children and young adults.

Rapid, free-breathing non-contrast MRI for first-line imaging evaluation of ovarian torsion in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Transabdominal ultrasound (US) is first-line imaging to evaluate ovaries in girls presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected ovarian torsion. Ovaries may be difficult to visualize sonographically; therefore, prompt diagnosis using US alone can be challenging. Rapid MRI as first-line imaging may help streamline patient throughput, especially with increasing MRI availability in the ED. OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of rapid MRI for diagnosis of ovarian torsion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single-center IRB approved study of MRI performed in female pediatric patients presenting with abdominopelvic pain from August 2022 to January 2023. Imaging occurred according to one of three clinical pathways (US-first approach vs MRI-first approach vs US + MRI-second-line approach). A rapid three-sequence free-breathing MRI protocol was utilized. Frequency of ovarian torsion and secondary diagnoses was recorded. Length of MR scan time, time from ED arrival to time of diagnosis, and whether patient had US prior to MR exam were obtained. A historical cohort of patients with US only performed for assessment of ovarian torsion were evaluated for length of the US examination and time from ED arrival to time of diagnosis. Intervals were compared using the uncorrected Fisher's least significant difference and Turkey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: A total of 140 MRI exams (mean age 14.6 years) and 248 historical US exams (mean age 13.5 years) were included. Of the patients with MRI, 41 (29%) patients were imaged with US + MRI and 99 (71%) imaged with MRI only; 4% (6/140) MR exams were suspicious for ovarian torsion, with one true positive case (1/6 TP) and 5 false positive cases (5/6 FP); 26.4% (37/140) of exams had secondary diagnoses. Median MRI scan time was 11.4 min (4.4) vs median historical US scan time was 24.1 min (19.7) (P<0.001). Median time from arrival in ED to MRI read was 242 (140). Median time from arrival in ED to US only read was 268 min (148). This was not a statistically significant difference when compared to the MRI only cohort. CONCLUSION: First-line MRI imaging for evaluation of ovarian torsion is a rapid and feasible imaging modality for female patients in the emergent setting.

Trends in Anesthesia/Sedation for Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Encounters in Pediatric Emergency Departments, 2012-2022.

This cross-sectional study assesses trends over time in sedation/anesthesia use for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) across pediatric emergency departments (EDs).

Practice Patterns in Use of MRI for Appendicitis in the Emergency Department at Children's Hospitals: Results of a National Survey.

This study reports results of a national survey of member institutions of the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children's Hospitals regarding use of MRI for appendicitis in the emergency department (ED); respondents from 39 of 100 surveyed institutions participated. A total of 21 of 39 institutions perform MRI for acute appendicitis in the ED; 17 of 21 institutions perform MRI only after an initial ultrasound examination. The number of MRI sequences ranges from three to eight. The estimated room time ranges from 8 to 30 minutes.

Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on pediatric intestinal intussusception in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Masking and social distancing to mitigate the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) virus curbed the spread of other viruses. Given a potential link between viral illnesses and ileocolic intussusception, the purpose of this study is to characterize trends in incidence, diagnosis and management of pediatric intussusception in the United States in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional retrospective study used the Pediatric Hospital Information System and included children (ages 0-17 years) with a primary diagnosis of intussusception (ICD-10 [International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision]: K56.1) from January 2018 to December 2021. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were used to characterize and compare proportions pre-COVID (2018 and 2019) to 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: Eight thousand one hundred forty-three encounters met inclusion criteria. Intussusception diagnoses declined in 2020 (n = 1,480) compared to 2019 (n = 2,321) and 2018 (n = 2,171) but returned to pre-COVID levels in 2021 (n = 2,171). Patient age was similar across years (mean age in years: 2018: 2.3; 2019: 2.1; 2020: 2.3; 2021: 2.3). There was no significant change in the proportion of patients who underwent imaging in 2020 (96% [1,415/1,480]) compared to the other years in the study (2018: 96% [2,093/2,171], P = 0.21; 2019: 97% [2,253/2,321], P = 0.80; 2021: 96% [1,415/1,480], P = 0.85). There was a statistically significant but minimal increase in the proportion of cases treated with surgery in 2020 compared to 2019 (2020: 17.8% vs. 2019: 15%, P = 0.02); however, this was not replicated in the pairwise comparison of 2020 to 2018 (2020: 17.8% vs. 2018: 16.4%, P = 0.23). There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of cases treated with surgery in 2020 compared to 2021 (2020: 17.8% vs. 2021: 14%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pediatric intussusception diagnoses decreased at a national level in 2020 compared to previous years, with a rebound increase in 2021. This may reflect a secondary benefit of public health interventions imposed to curb the spread of COVID-19.

Gender disparity in academic advancement: exploring differences among adult and pediatric radiologists.

BACKGROUND: Gender imbalance in research output and academic rank in academic radiology is well-documented and long-standing. Less is known regarding this imbalance among pediatric radiologists. OBJECTIVE: To characterize gender differences for academic rank and scholarly productivity of pediatric radiologists relative to adult radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During summer 2021, faculty data for the top 10 U.S. News & World Report ranked adult radiology programs and the top 12 largest pediatric hospital radiology departments were collected. Information regarding self-reported gender, age, years of practice and academic rank was accessed from institutional websites and public provider databases. The h-index and the number of publications were acquired via Scopus. Group comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-four (160 women) pediatric and 1,170 (468 women) adult radiologists were included. Compared to adult radiologists, there were significantly fewer pediatric radiologists in advanced ranks (associate or full professor) (P = 0.024), driven by differences between male (P = 0.033) but not female radiologists (P = 0.67). Among pediatric radiologists, there was no significant difference in years in practice (P = 0.29) between males and females. There also was no significant difference in academic rank by gender (P = 0.37), different from adult radiology where men outnumber women in advanced ranks (P < 0.001). Male pediatric radiologists displayed higher academic productivity (h-index: 9.0 vs. 7.0; P = 0.01 and number of publications: 31 vs. 18; P = 0.003) than their female colleagues. CONCLUSION: Academic pediatric radiology seems to have more equitable academic advancement than academic adult radiology. Despite similar time in the workforce, academic output among female pediatric radiologists lags that of their male colleagues.

Burnout Is the Symptom, Moral Injury Is the Cause: The Need for Systems-Level Changes in Radiology.

Burnout. Wellness. Resiliency. Self-care. These buzzwords have become commonplace and the topics of articles, webinars, and lectures in medicine. Opinions vary about the most effective initiatives to optimize radiologist wellness and mitigate burnout. Despite ongoing efforts, burnout continues to grow. Although individual-directed interventions play a role, the greater leverage lies with practice- and organization-led initiatives.

Harms in Encouraging Social Media Use for Individual Academic Advancement.

In academic medicine, the use of social media to share accomplishments is important for various purposes that facilitate academic advancement. However, social media engagement as a criterion for academic advancement is not based on evidence and can cause individual harms related to pressure, expectations, competition, and discomfort.