Is COVID-19 severity associated with telomere length? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Telomere shortening, a marker of cellular aging, has been linked to hospitalization and the severity of COVID-19. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the mean difference in telomere length between non-severe and severe COVID-19 individuals was pooled to determine the association between short telomeres and COVID-19 severity. Relevant studies were retrieved through searches conducted in PubMed-Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Medrxiv, Biorxiv, EuroPMC, and SSRN databases up to November 2022. Selected studies were systematically reviewed and assessed for risk of bias using AXIS tool. The standardized mean difference in telomere length between non-severe and severe COVID-19 was pooled using random-effects model. A total of thirteen studies were included in the review, out of which seven (1332 patients with the severe COVID-19 disease and 6321 patients with non-severe COVID-19) were eligible for meta-analysis. The estimated pooled mean difference in Leukocyte telomere length between severe COVID-19 and non-severe COVID-19 was 0.39 (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.81, I2 = 93.5%) with substantial heterogeneity. Our findings do not provide clear evidence for association of shorter telomere length and severe COVID-19 disease. More extensive studies measuring absolute telomere length with age and gender adjustments are needed to draw definitive conclusions on the potential causal association between telomere shortening and COVID-19 severity.

The association between body mass index, abdominal fatness, and weight change and the risk of adult asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Obesity has been associated with increased risk of adult asthma, however, not all studies have found a clear association between overweight and the incidence of asthma, and data on other adiposity measures have been limited. Hence, we aimed to summarize evidence on association between adiposity and adult asthma. Relevant studies were retrieved through searches conducted in PubMed, and EMBASE up to March 2021. A total of sixteen studies (63,952 cases and 1,161,169 participants) were included in the quantitative synthesis. The summary RR was 1.32 (95% CI 1.21-1.44, I2 = 94.6%, pheterogeneity < 0.0001, n = 13) per 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI, 1.26 (95% CI 1.09-1.46, I2 = 88.6%, pheterogeneity < 0.0001, n = 5) per 10 cm increase in waist circumference and 1.33 (95% CI 1.22-1.44, I2 = 62.3%, pheterogeneity= 0.05, n = 4) per 10 kg increase in weight gain. Although the test for nonlinearity was significant for BMI (pnonlinearity < 0.00001), weight change (pnonlinearity = 0.002), and waist circumference (pnonlinearity = 0.02), there was a clear dose-response relationship between higher levels of adiposity and asthma risk. The magnitude of the associations and the consistency of the results across studies and adiposity measures provide strong evidence that overweight and obesity, waist circumference and weight gain increases asthma risk. These findings support policies to curb the global epidemic of overweight and obesity.

Cost-utility of Ranolazine for Chronic Stable Angina Pectoris: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Ranolazine is used to treat stable angina pectoris, the most common symptom of ischemic heart disease. Appropriate management of chronic stable angina pectoris is essential from both a clinical and an economic view point. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included cost-utility analyses, which compared ranolazine with other standard treatments for treating stable angina pectoris. The search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. A random-effects model based on the DerSimonian and Laird method was used to pool the incremental net benefit reported in purchasing power parity adjusted US dollars. The modified economic evaluation checklist was used to assess the risk of bias. FINDINGS: The pooled results from 7 selected studies with a time horizon of 1 year show that add-on ranolazine was significantly cost-effective compared with standard treatment, with a pooled incremental net benefit of US$1335 (95% CI, 500 to 2169) but with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 79.46%). On subgroup analysis, ranolazine was cost-effective from the payers' perspective (US$1975; 95% CI, 1042 to 2908; I2 = 69.23) but not from a societal perspective (US$297; 95% CI, -241 to 715; I2 = 0%)]. There was limited evidence from lower economies. IMPLICATIONS: Pooled evidence suggests that add-on ranolazine therapy is cost-effective for chronic stable angina pectoris up to a 1-year time horizon. There is a lacuna of evidence from low- and middle-income countries and on long-term cost-effectiveness. The current evidence synthesis may provide a macroeconomic point of view for policy makers regarding the direction of ranolazine's cost-effectiveness for evidence-informed policy-making. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022332454.