Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Obstet Gynecol Surv ; 68(3): 215-27, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23945838

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Effective postoperative pain management provides improved patient comfort and satisfaction, earlier mobilization, fewer pulmonary and cardiac complications, reduced risk of deep vein thrombosis, faster recovery, and reduced cost of care. Although many therapeutic modalities are available for pain management, the optimal combination in managing postoperative pain in total abdominal hysterectomy is controversial. The objective of this study was to review the literature to formulate optimal, evidence-based preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain management for women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Using the OVID platform, we searched in MEDLINE and PubMed using MeSH terms postoperative pain and total abdominal hysterectomy for published articles from 1960 to the present; we found 545 studies. We screened and included only randomized clinical trials, publications in English, human studies, and abdominal hysterectomy for noncancerous indications. We excluded 456 studies that reported on animal studies; laparoscopic, vaginal, supracervical, or robotic hysterectomy; pharmacokinetic studies; primary outcome other than pain management; and chronic pain management. Studies with inadequate power, poor methodology, or inconclusive results were further excluded from this review. Thus, 89 studies constituted the cohort for our article. Pain control remains complex given variables such as age, anxiety, and extent of surgery. In general, regimens should be tailored to the needs of the individual patient, taking into account medical, psychological, and physical condition. A multimodality approach is better than conventional, single-agent narcotic in achieving optimal pain management. After reading this article, the reader should be able to understand various modalities that can be considered for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain management in total abdominal hysterectomy. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians Learning Objectives: After completing this CME activity, physicians should be better able to understand various modalities that can be considered for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain management in total abdominal hysterectomy.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Histerectomía/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ann Pharmacother ; 46(5): e11, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22510667

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report the case of a 58-year-old male with melanoma who developed aldesleukin-induced rigors and was successfully treated with intravenous dantrolene sodium 20 mg and provide a review of the literature discussing other agents that have been used to treat drug-induced rigors. CASE SUMMARY: A 58-year-old male was treated with 720,000 IU/kg of aldesleukin every 8 hours as part of his antimelanoma therapy. The patient developed rigors after aldesleukin administration and was successfully treated with 25 mg of meperidine. Later, he experienced renal dysfunction that was also linked to aldesleukin therapy and developed normeperidine-induced neurotoxicity requiring discontinuation of meperidine therapy. The rigors were treated with intravenous dantrolene sodium 20 mg every 4 hours, with complete resolution of symptoms. DISCUSSION: Several antineoplastic agents can cause rigors; many of these agents can also lead to renal failure. Several agents have been investigated for their use in the management of rigors but can cause adverse effects or are unsuitable in the setting of renal insufficiency or failure. Although meperidine remains the mainstay for the treatment and prevention of rigors, it can be associated with neurotoxicity in some patients, particularly those with impaired renal function. Given that dantrolene has been shown to be effective against rigors, it may be a useful alternative for patients who can not tolerate meperidine. Drugs with a more favorable adverse effect profile that are not eliminated through the kidneys are needed. CONCLUSIONS: In the oncology setting, severe rigors can result in the interruption of a patient's cancer therapy, which can increase the risk of treatment failure. Dantrolene may be a useful alternative for patients experiencing rigors who can not tolerate meperidine.


Asunto(s)
Escalofríos/inducido químicamente , Escalofríos/tratamiento farmacológico , Dantroleno/uso terapéutico , Interleucina-2/análogos & derivados , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiritona/efectos de los fármacos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Escalofríos/complicaciones , Humanos , Interleucina-2/efectos adversos , Masculino , Melanoma/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...