RESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this work was to describe the clinical characteristics of adults with type 1 diabetes admitted to hospital and the risk factors associated with severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data collected through a nationwide audit of people admitted to hospital with diabetes and COVID-19, conducted by the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists from March to October 2020. Prespecified demographic, clinical, medication and laboratory data were collected from the electronic and paper medical record systems of the participating hospitals by local clinicians. The primary outcome of the study, severe COVID-19, was defined as death in hospital and/or admission to the adult intensive care unit (AICU). Logistic regression models were used to generate age-adjusted ORs. RESULTS: Forty UK centres submitted data. The final dataset included 196 adults who were admitted to hospital and had both type 1 diabetes and COVID-19 on admission (male sex 55%, white 70%, with mean [SD] age 62 [19] years, BMI 28.3 [7.3] kg/m2 and last recorded HbA1c 76 [31] mmol/mol [9.1 (5.0)%]). The prevalence of pre-existing microvascular disease and macrovascular disease was 56% and 39%, respectively. The prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis on admission was 29%. A total of 68 patients (35%) died or were admitted to AICU. The proportions of people that died were 7%, 38% and 38% of those aged <55, 55-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. BMI, serum creatinine levels and having one or more microvascular complications were positively associated with the primary outcome after adjusting for age. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In people with type 1 diabetes and COVID-19 who were admitted to hospital in the UK, higher BMI, poorer renal function and presence of microvascular complications were associated with greater risk of death and/or admission to AICU. Risk of severe COVID-19 is reassuringly very low in people with type 1 diabetes who are under 55 years of age without microvascular or macrovascular disease. IN PEOPLE WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES AND COVID-19 ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL IN THE UK, BMI AND ONE OR MORE MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS HAD A POSITIVE ASSOCIATION AND LOW SERUM CREATINE LEVELS HAD A NEGATIVE ASSOCIATION WITH DEATH/ADMISSION TO INTENSIVE CARE UNIT AFTER ADJUSTING FOR AGE.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Hiperglucemia/complicaciones , Cuerpos Cetónicos/sangre , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Anciano , COVID-19 , Cetoacidosis Diabética/complicaciones , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Managing people with diabetes is a health priority worldwide. Cost benefit attempts at avoiding non elective admissions (NEA) have had some success. To develop an NEA avoidance service, we audited multiple NEA in those with diabetes. METHOD: All people with diabetes who had ≥3 NEA to our hospital over 12 months were identified (n=418); 104 (1 in 4) patients were randomly selected and retrospective data collected in 98 subjects on their index (latest, 3rd) admission. RESULTS: Of 98 subjects (50 males, 60 Caucasians, 86 type 2 diabetes, aged 69±16 years).Conditions contributing to admission included: Significant co-morbidities in 95 patients (≥2 in 57, ≥4 in 24). Only 14 admission were directly due to diabetes: hypoglycaemia (5); hyperglycaemia (6); DKA (2), Infected foot ulcer (1).97 admissions were justified at the time of presentation. However whilst 78 were unavoidable, 19 were deemed avoidable amongst whom 10 were diabetes related. CONCLUSION: The majority of re-admissions were due to multi-morbidity and were often non-diabetes related. The concept of avoidability must be distinguished from point justification at the time of acute need. This would allow the prospective identification of high risk patients and requires an integrated working process to avoid NEA.