Dupilumab treatment in paediatric atopic dermatitis (2 to 18 years): Spanish multicentre retrospective real-life study.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) can be difficult to manage in paediatric patients, with few licensed treatments in this age group. Dupilumab is approved for AD in children older than 6 months. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in a real-life cohort of paediatric AD patients in Spain. METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective real-life study on the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients aged 2 to 18 years old with moderate-to-severe AD was conducted. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analysed, and effectiveness (EASI, IGA, DLQI, NRS itch), safety, and drug survival measures were assessed. A comparison of our results with other real-world outcomes and with clinical trials was made. RESULTS: Data from 243 patients from 19 centres was collected, with a mean follow-up of 85 weeks. Dupilumab exhibited significant effectiveness, with marked reductions in severity scores from week 4. By week 16, 79.4% of patients reached EASI75 and 40.5% reached EASI90. Mean percentage reduction in EASI was 79.7%. Increasing improvements were observed until week 52, with 85.8% and 49.6% achieving EASI75 and EASI90, respectively. Forty-three patients developed adverse events (AE) (43/243, 17.7%), being the most frequent ocular surface diseases (20/243, 8.2%), injection site reactions (8/243, 3.3%) and facial redness (7/243, 2.9%). Drug survival was high (96.9% and 93.1% after 1 and 2 years of follow-up, respectively), with only 19 (19/243, 7.8%) patients interrupting treatment: 7 (7/243, 2.9%) due to AE, 2 (2/243, 0.82%) due to secondary failure, 5 (5/243, 2.1%) were lost to follow-up and 5 (5/243, 2.1%) entered remission and stopped treatment. CONCLUSION: Real-life use of dupilumab in paediatric AD showcased sustained effectiveness, high drug survival, and acceptable safety profiles. Longer-term studies are crucial for AE surveillance and how to manage disease remission.

Melanoma-specific survival is worse in the elderly: a multicentric cohort study.

We aimed to characterise cutaneous melanoma in the elderly and determine its association with poorer prognosis. We studied a prospective cohort of the melanoma population in Catalonia between 2012 and 2016. We compared young patient group (<75 years old) with elderly patient group (≥75 years old). We included 3009 patients (52.5% women) from 14 centres, with a mean age at diagnosis of 61.1 years. In the ≥75-year-old group there was a predominance of men (53.9% vs. 45.5%, P  < 0.001), melanoma was more frequently located in the head and neck area (37.7% vs. 15.5%, P  < 0.001) and lentigo maligna melanoma subtype was significantly more frequent (31.4% vs. 11.6%, P  < 0.001), as were nodular melanoma and acral lentiginous melanoma ( P  < 0.001). In older people, Breslow index, the presence of ulceration and mitotic rate were higher than in younger people. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed longer melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and melanoma-free survival (MFS) in <75-year-old group compared to the elderly group. Cox regression models demonstrated reduced MSS in patients ≥75 years regardless of gender, location, IB, ulceration and lymph node status at diagnosis (HR 1.54, P  = 0.013) whereas MFS was not independently associated with elderly when head and neck location was considered. Age appears to be an independent risk factor for MSS but not for MFS. Worse melanoma prognosis in elderly could be explained by factors unrelated to the tumour, such as age-related frailty and comorbidities that limit the access to systemic treatments and, eventually, age-related immune dysfunction.

Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial inducida por hidroxicloroquina / Interstitial lung disease induced by hydroxychloroquine

No disponible