Increased in vivo perpetuation of whole-heart ventricular arrhythmia in heterozygous Na+/Ca2+ exchanger knockout mice.

Aims: Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) upregulation in cardiac diseases like heart failure promotes as an independent proarrhythmic factor early and delayed afterdepolarizations (EADs/DADs) on the single cell level. Consequently, NCX inhibition protects against EADs and DADs in isolated cardiomyocytes. We here investigate, whether these promising cellular in vitro findings likewise apply to an in vivo setup. Methods/Results: Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) and isoproterenol were applied to a murine heterozygous NCX-knockout model (KO) to investigate ventricular arrhythmia initiation and perpetuation compared to wild-type (WT). KO displayed a reduced susceptibility towards isoproterenol-induced premature ventricular complexes. During PVS, initiation of single or double ectopic beats was similar between KO and WT. But strikingly, perpetuation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) was significantly increased in KO (animals with VT - KO: 82 %; WT: 47 %; p = 0.0122 / median number of VTs - KO: 4.5 (1.0, 6.25); WT: 0.0 (0.0, 4.0); p = 0.0039). The median VT duration was prolonged in KO (in s; KO: 0.38 (0.19, 0.96); WT: 0.0 (0.0, 0.60); p = 0.0239). The ventricular refractory period (VRP) was shortened in KO (in ms; KO: 15.1 ± 0.7; WT: 18.7 ± 0.7; p = 0.0013). Conclusions: Not the initiation, but the perpetuation of provoked whole-heart in vivo ventricular arrhythmia was increased in KO. As a potential mechanism, we found a significantly reduced VRP, which may promote perpetuation of reentrant ventricular arrhythmia. On a translational perspective, the antiarrhythmic concept of therapeutic NCX inhibition seems to be ambivalent by protecting from initiating afterdepolarizations but favoring arrhythmia perpetuation in vivo at least in a murine model.

Predicting inappropriate S-ICD® episodes by simple 12-lead surface ECG parameters.

AIMS: The present study aims at analyzing the role of a preimplantation 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) on the prediction of inappropriate S-ICD® episodes. METHODS: N=116 screened patients (pts) with an S-ICD® and a follow-up of at least 6 months were included. A preimplantation 12-lead ECG (50 mm/s, 10 mm/mV) was analyzed with regard to QRS and T-wave amplitude, T wave concordance or discordance and QRS/T wave ratio in all 12 leads. To ensure an exact determination of parameters Datinf® Measure software was used. Results were correlated to the occurrence of oversensing of cardiac signals during follow-up. RESULTS: N = 116 pts. (63,8% male, mean age 40,9 ± 15,5 years) were included (primary prevention in 47.4% of pts). The most frequent cardiac diseases were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in n = 25 (21,6%), electrical heart disease in n = 20 (17,2%), and dilated cardiomyopathy in n = 17 (14,7%). Mean follow-up was 740 ± 549 days. During follow- up n = 17 (14.7%) pts. experienced n = 27 inappropriate episodes due to T-wave oversensing. Besides HCM (OR 6.16, CI 1.79-21.15, p = 0.004) a discordance of QRS to T-wave in lead I (OR 6.5, CI 1.86-22.67, p = 0.003) was found to be a strong predictor for inappropriate shocks. In multivariate analysis the pts. with a combination of both had an 8.4-fold higher risk of misclassification of intracardiac signals (p = 0.003) with consecutive inappropriate therapy. CONCLUSION: A discordance of QRS to T-wave in lead I turned out to be a strong predictor for future inappropriate shocks in a typical S-ICD® cohort with special impact on HCM pts.

The ECG in sarcoidosis - a marker of cardiac involvement? Current evidence and clinical implications.

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown etiology characterized by noncaseating granulomas. Cardiac involvement is often limiting patients' prognosis. Cardiac sarcoidosis can manifest with variant cardiac arrhythmias, of which atrioventricular (AV)-block-related bradycardia and ventricular tachycardias are the most common. Although cardiac sarcoidosis remains a histopathological diagnosis, the significance of imaging modalities, especially cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is increasing rapidly but mainly remains reserved for patients with a high suspicion due to a previous arrhythmia or unknown cardiomyopathy. Thus, there is a need for screening in daily clinical practice so that possible characteristic electrocardiographic (ECG) findings may guide the way to detect the disease. We therefore evaluated the ECG as a potential tool for screening of cardiac sarcoidosis and present different electrophysiological manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis based on a literature review. The ECG is a valuable tool for screening of cardiac involvement in patients with sarcoidosis. Several parameters have been shown to be associated with cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis such as higher-degree AV-block, QRS complex fragmentation and widening, as well as certain T wave abnormalities that may indicate cardiac involvement, of which the latter two are most promising and specific. However, prospective studies examining a large number of trials are desirable.

Divergent Electrophysiological Effects of Loperamide and Naloxone in a Sensitive Whole-Heart Model.

Several case reports suggest QT prolongation leading to ventricular arrhythmias with fatal outcome after intoxication with the µ-opioid receptor agonist and anti-diarrheal agent loperamide. The number of cases of loperamide misuse are growing due to its potential stimulating effects. Loperamide intoxications can be treated by naloxone. However, previous reports described a further QT prolongation associated with naloxone administration. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of loperamide and naloxone on the cardiac electrophysiology in a sensitive whole-heart model. Twenty-six hearts of New Zealand White rabbits were retrogradely perfused in a modified Langendorff apparatus. Monophasic action potentials were recorded by endo- and epicardially positioned catheters. Hearts were stimulated at different cycle lengths, thereby obtaining action potential duration at 90% of repolarization (APD90) and QT intervals. Programmed ventricular stimulation was used to assess ventricular vulnerability. Fourteen hearts were perfused with ascending concentrations of loperamide (0.2 µM, 0.35 µM, and 0.5 µM) after obtaining baseline data. Another 12 hearts were treated with naloxone (0.1 µM, 0.5 µM, 2 µM). Loperamide led to a significant increase in QT interval, APD90, and ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes. In contrast, naloxone led to a decrease in QT interval and APD90. Accordingly, the number of VT episodes was unaltered. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study that investigated the effects of loperamide and naloxone in a whole-heart model. Loperamide led to a significant increase in action potential duration and QT interval. Simultaneously, the number of ventricular tachycardias was significantly increased. In contrast, naloxone led to a shortening of the action potential duration without altering arrhythmia susceptibility.

Pitfalls of the S-ICD therapy: experiences from a large tertiary centre.

AIM: The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) has evolved to a potential first option for many patients who have to be protected from sudden cardiac death. Many trials have underlined a similar performance regarding its effectiveness in relation to transvenous ICDs and have shown the expected benefits concerning infective endocarditis and lead failure. However, there have also been problems due to the peculiarities of the device, such as oversensing and myopotentials. In this study, we present patients from a large tertiary centre suffering from complications with an S-ICD and propose possible solutions. METHODS AND RESULTS: All S-ICD patients who experienced complications related to the device (n = 40) of our large-scale single-centre S-ICD registry (n = 351 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, complications occurring and solutions to these problems were documented over a mean follow-up of 50 months. In most cases (n = 23), patients suffered from oversensing (18 cases with T wave or P wave oversensing, 5 due to myopotentials). Re-programming successfully prevented further oversensing episode in 13/23 patients. In 9 patients, generator or lead-related complications, mostly due to infectious reasons (5/9), occurred. Further problems consisted of ineffective shocks in one patient and need for antibradycardia stimulation in 2 patients and indication for CRT in 2 other patients. In total, the S-ICD had to be extracted in 10 patients. 7 of them received a tv-ICD subsequently, 3 patients refused re-implantation of any ICD. One other patient kept the ICD but had antitachycardic therapy deactivated due to inappropriate shocks for myopotential oversensing. CONCLUSION: The S-ICD is a valuable option for many patients for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Nonetheless, certain problems are immanent to the S-ICD (limited re-programming options, size of the generator) and should be addressed in future generations of the S-ICD.

Ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation in the very elderly real-world data on safety and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: The role and technique of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly is unclear. While in young patients pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has evolved as first option, in older patients decision is often made in favor of drugs as higher complication rates and less benefit are suspected. Therefore, data on PVI of paroxysmal and persistent AF in these patients is still sparse but of eminent importance. HYPOTHESIS: PVI is comparably safe in the very elderly with similar recurrence and complication rates. METHODS: We enrolled all patients (n = 146) aged >75 years who underwent a first PVI over a period of 10 years (2009-2019) from our prospective single-center ablation registry. Mean follow-up time was 231 ± 399 days. RESULTS: Acute ablation success defined as complete PVI and sinus rhythm at the end of the ablation procedure was high (99%). Severe periprocedural complications occurred in 3.3% (stroke/TIA n = 2; 1.3%; pericardial effusion n = 3; 2%). In 4.6% of patients symptomatic sick-sinus-syndrome was unmasked after PVI resulting in pacemaker implantation. There were no deaths related to PVI. Recurrence rate of symptomatic AF was 37.3% resulting in a Re-PVI and/or substrate ablation in 32 pts (20.9%). During follow-up pacemaker implantation plus atrioventricular node ablation was performed in 10 pts (6.8%). There was a trend toward lower recurrence rates with single-shot devices (cryoballoon, multielectrode phased-radiofrequency ablation catheter) than with point-by-point radiofrequency while complication rates did not differ. CONCLUSION: PVI for AF is a feasible treatment option also in patients >75 years with a reasonable success and safety profile. Higher success rates occurred in patients treated with a single-shot device as compared to point-by-point ablation.

Outcome of catheter ablation in the very elderly-insights from a large matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ablation emerged as first line therapy in the treatment of various arrhythmias. Nevertheless, in older patients (pts), decision is often made pro drug treatment as more complications and less benefit are suspected. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that different kind of ablations can be performed safely regardless of the pts age. METHODS: We enrolled all pts aged >80 years (yrs) who underwent ablation for three different arrhythmias (atrial flutter [AFL], atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia [AVNRT], ventricular tachycardia [VT]) between August 2002 and December 2018. Procedural data and outcome were compared with matched groups aged 60 to 80 years and 40 to 60 years, respectively. Periprocedural and in-hospital complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis included 1191 patients (397 pts per group: 63% AFL, 23% AVNRT, 14% VT) who underwent ablation. Acute success was high in all types of arrhythmias irrespective of age (>80, 60-80, 40-60 years: AFL 97%/98%/98%, AVNRT 97%/95%/97%, VT 82%/86%/93%). Rate of periprocedural complications were similar in all groups treated for AFL and AVNRT. For VT ablations significant differences were noted between pts > 80 or 60 to 80 years and those aged 40-60 years (16.1%/14.3%/3.6%). Most complications were infections and groin haematoma. No strokes, iatrogenic atrioventricular blocks and deaths related to the ablation occurred. CONCLUSION: Ablation appears safe in pts > 80 years. Success rates were comparable to matched younger cohorts. A significant difference was observed for VT patients.

Concomitant Treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cephalosporins Does Not Enhance QT-Associated Proarrhythmia in Isolated Rabbit Hearts.

Recent results from data mining analyses and reports of adverse drug events suggest a QT-prolonging drug-drug interaction resulting from the combination of distinct proton pump inhibitors and cephalosporins. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the effect of the suspected QT-prolonging combinations of lansoprazole + ceftriaxone and esomeprazole + cefazolin, respectively. 26 hearts of New Zealand White rabbits were retrogradely perfused and paced at different cycle lengths. After generating baseline data, the hearts were assigned to two groups: In group 1, hearts were treated with 5 µM lansoprazole. Thereafter, 200 µM ceftriaxone was infused additionally. Group 2 was perfused with 10 µM esomeprazole followed by 250 µM cefazolin. In group 1, lansoprazole did not significantly alter QT intervals and APD90. Additional treatment with ceftriaxone significantly shortened QT interval, APD90 and slightly reduced dispersion of repolarization compared to sole lansoprazole infusion. In group 2, esomeprazole led to a significant shortening of the QT interval without altering APD90 or dispersion. Additional treatment with the antibiotic cefazolin further shortened QT interval, APD90 and reduced the dispersion of repolarization. Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias was not significantly altered in both groups. This is the first experimental whole-heart study that investigated the impact of a concomitant treatment with proton pump inhibitors and cephalosporins. In contrast to previous reports, the combination of both agents did not cause QT prolongation but instead shortened QT interval and action potential duration. As a consequence, no triggered activity occurred in the presence of a stable dispersion of repolarization.

Outcome differences and device performance of the subcutaneous ICD in patients with and without structural heart disease.

BACKGROUND: The performance of the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) has been described in different kinds of heart disease and has been proven to be an important advance in prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). While positive experiences with the S-ICD™ initially came from collectives of patients without structural heart diseases, positive results have also been collected from cohorts with structural heart disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All S-ICD™ patients with either ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as the main indication for ICD implantation (n = 144 patients) or electrical heart disease/idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (n = 83 patients) in our large-scaled single-center S-ICD™ registry were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 18 ± 15 months. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were significantly different between the two groups in most categories. In contrast, there was no difference concerning neither appropriate nor inappropriate shock delivery between the two groups. Also other outcome parameters such as need for surgical revisions and all-cause mortality did not differ. There was a significant difference between the first- and second-generation S-ICDs™ in inadequate shocks mainly driven by patients with HCM. CONCLUSION: In our study, S-ICD™ performance was similar in patients with and without structural heart disease. Decision pro- or contra-S-ICD™ should be made rather on the basis of expected shock rate and probability of the need for future anti-tachycardia or anti-bradycardia pacing than in dependence of the underlying heart disease.

Performance of the entirely subcutaneous ICD in borderline indications.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) is an important advance in device therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). In some patients, decision pro- or contra-ICD implantation is particularly challenging due to inconsistent data on risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias or sudden cardiac death, rare entities, special medical or family history, or patients' wishes. Whether decision-making in these borderline cases has been facilitated with the new option of a S-ICD™ is unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with an implanted S-ICD™ without a class I or IIa recommendation for primary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death in the current guidelines (n = 30 patients) in our large-scaled single-centre S-ICD™ registry (n = 249 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 40 months. RESULTS: In all patients S-ICD™ implantation was performed for primary prevention of SCD. Of all 30 patients with an overall mean age of 40.5 ± 15.6 years, 17 were male (57%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 54.5 ± 9.9%. Indication were highly variable and ranged from structural heart disease, nsVT and LV-EF > 35% to patients with polymorphic non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) and suspect syncope. During follow-up, six episodes of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and four episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) were adequately terminated in three patients (10%). Two of these patients were implanted for polymorphic nsVT and previous syncope without structural heart disease. In three patients, T-wave-oversensing and in one patient also P-wave-oversensing resulted in an inappropriate shock (five in total), two additional episodes of oversensing ended before shock delivery. There were no S-ICD™ system-related infections. In five patients S-ICD™ replacement was performed due to battery depletion (four regular, one premature). In five patients, ablation procedures were performed after implantation (four because of frequent symptomatic ventricular extra beats, one because of atrial flutter). Change to a transvenous system was necessary in two patients due to need for antibradycardia pacing. CONCLUSION: The use of the S-ICD™ was safe in patients with borderline or unclear indication for ICD implantation in our study. Of note, during a relatively short mean follow-up there were several appropriate therapies, especially for VF in these patients. On the other hand, oversensing also occurred in about 10% of patients, while lead problems were not problematic in this collective. S-ICD™ implantation may be considered as a possible alternative in cases of borderline indications and clinical uncertainty when decision pro-ICD implantation is made. Incidence of arrhythmias was quite high and mostly consisted of VF. Nevertheless, patient education seems even more important as there is a considerable risk for inappropriate therapies as well.

The role of entirely subcutaneous ICD™ systems in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD™, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) is an important advance in device therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although current guidelines recommend S-ICD™ use, long-term data are still limited, especially in subgroups. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common reason for the implantation of an ICD. However, there are no sufficient data on the performance of the S-ICD™ in this patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All S-ICD™ patients with DCM as the main indication for ICD implantation (n=47 patients) in our large-scaled single-center S-ICD™ registry (n=294 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 22.9±18.5 months. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients with DCM as the underlying structural heart disease received an S-ICD™ in our institution. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 37±12% and a 28% had a history of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. During follow-up eight ventricular tachyarrhythmias were adequately terminated in three patients. In four patients, oversensing resulting in an inappropriate shock was observed, which could be managed by changing the sensing vector. There was no need for a change to a cardiac resynchronization (CRT) system while one system was changed to a VVI-ICD due to S-ICD™ wound infection. CONCLUSION: The S-ICD™ seems to be a valuable option for the prevention of SCD in patients with DCM and no indication for CRT. As clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmias consisted of ventricular fibrillation or fast ventricular tachycardia in all patients in our cohort, no change to transvenous ICDs for anti-tachycardia pacing delivery was necessary.

Outcome of catheter ablation of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of not sufficiently understood origin. Some patients develop cardiac involvement in course of the disease which is mostly responsible for adverse outcome. In addition to complications like high degree atrioventricular (AV) block or ventricular tachyarrhythmias, there is a certain percentage of patients developing atrial tachyarrhythmias. Data is limited and the role of catheter ablation uncertain. Therefore, we studied sarcoid patients who presented with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. HYPOTHESIS: Treatment and ablation of supraventricular tachycardia could be hampered by inflammation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. METHODS: We enrolled 37 consecutive patients with cardiac sarcoidosis who presented with atrial tachyarrhythmias and underwent an electrophysiologic study over a period of 6 years (03/2013-04/2019). In total, 16 catheter ablations for atrial tachyarrhythmias were performed. Mean follow-up duration was 2.5 years. RESULTS: Most common ablation performed was cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter in seven patients (54%). Pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) was performed in five patients (38%). Two patients received slow-pathway modulation for treatment of recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). All but two patients with AF had no clinical recurrence during follow-up. Two patients had recurrence of AF but still reported markedly improved european heart rhythm association (EHRA) class. Periprocedural safety was very high. There were no adverse events related to the ablation procedure. One patient died during follow-up in the presence of electrical storm. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablations of supraventricular tachycardias seem to be safe and effective in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Outcome is comparable to patients without inflammatory heart disease, although data from larger patient collectives are mandatory to make recommendations in this special entity.

The entirely subcutaneous ICDTM system in patients with congenital heart disease: experience from a large single-centre analysis.

AIMS: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICDTM) is an important advance in device therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although current guidelines recommend S-ICDTM use, long-term data are still limited, especially in subgroups such as adult patients with congenital heart diseases. This cohort is of high interest because of the difficult anatomic conditions in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: All S-ICDTM patients with an underlying congenital heart disease (CHD) resulting in an indication for ICD implantation (n = 20 patients) in our large-scaled single-centre S-ICDTM registry (n = 249 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 36 months. Primary prevention of SCD was the indication for implantation of an S-ICDTM in six patients (30%). Of all 20 patients with an overall mean age of 40.5 ± 11.5 years, 12 were male (60%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 46.5 ± 11.3%. Nine episodes of ventricular tachycardia (two monomorphic and seven polymorphic) were adequately terminated in three patients (15%). In two patients, T-Wave-Oversensing resulting in an inappropriate shock was observed, which could be managed by changing the sensing vector or activation of the SMART PASSTM filter. There were no S-ICDTM system-related infections. In one patient, surgical revision was necessary due to a persistent haematoma. CONCLUSION: The S-ICDTM seems to be a valuable option for the prevention of SCD in patients with various CHDs and complex anatomical anomalies. The S-ICDTM is safe and works effectively, also in these complex patients. Inadequate shock delivery was rare and could be managed by reprogramming.

Feasibility of entirely subcutaneous ICD™ systems in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) is an important advance in device therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although current guidelines recommend S-ICD™ use, long-term data are still limited, especially in subgroups. Among several cardiac diseases that prone to SCD, coronary artery disease (CAD) carries several peculiarities that may hamper S-ICD™ therapy in this cohort. CAD can lead to an ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with a reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and bundle branch blocks, which can be difficult for ICD sensing and discrimination of arrhythmia. CAD is mainly driven by risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, which put these patients at an elevated risk for infectious complications of cardiac devices. Furthermore, in ICM myocardial scars are frequent and are a potential substrate for ventricular tachycardia, which may be accessible for antitachycardia pacing. At the moment, it remains unclear if there is a value of S-ICD™ therapy in this subgroup. Therefore, this study analysed patients with CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All S-ICD™ patients with CAD as the main indication for ICD implantation (n = 45 patients) in our large-scaled single-center S-ICD™ registry (n = 249 patients) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and complications were documented in a mean follow-up of 22.5 ± 8.3 months. RESULTS: Primary prevention of SCD was the indication for implantation of an S-ICD™ in 28 patients (62%). Of all 45 patients with an overall mean age of 58.1 ± 11.4 years, 40 were male (88%). The mean LVEF was 37.7 ± 12.6%. Three episodes of ventricular arrhythmia (one monomorphic, one polymorphic, one ventricular fibrillation) were adequately terminated in three patients (7%). In only one patient, oversensing resulting in an inappropriate shock was observed, which could be managed by changing the sensing vector. 15 of the examined 45 patients previously had a transvenous ICD, which was explanted due to system-related infections. In only two patients, S-ICD™ was changed to transvenous ICD because of the need of antibradycardia stimulation. There were no S-ICD™ system-related infections. CONCLUSION: The S-ICD™ seems to be a valuable option for the prevention of SCD in CAD patients. Patients with systemic infections of a transvenous ICD and, therefore, a need for an alternative might benefit from the absence of intracardiac leads as the S-ICD™ is safe and works flawlessly in these patients. Inadequate shock delivery was very rare, while every episode of ventricular arrhythmia was terminated by the first shock.

Spotlight on S-ICD™ therapy: 10 years of clinical experience and innovation.

Subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD™) therapy has been established in initial clinical trials and current international guideline recommendations for patients without demand for pacing, cardiac resynchronization, or antitachycardia pacing. The promising experience in 'ideal' S-ICD™ candidates increasingly encourages physicians to provide the benefits of S-ICD™ therapy to patients in clinical constellations beyond 'classical' indications of S-ICD™ therapy, which has led to a broadening of S-ICD™ indications in many centres. However, the decision for S-ICD™ implantation is still not covered by controlled randomized trials but rather relies on patient series or observational studies. Thus, this review intends to give a contemporary update on available empirical evidence data and technical advancements of S-ICD™ technology and sheds a spotlight on S-ICD™ therapy in recently discovered fields of indication beyond ideal preconditions. We discuss the eligibility for S-ICD™ therapy in Brugada syndrome as an example for an adverse and dynamic electrocardiographic pattern that challenges the S-ICD™ sensing and detection algorithms. Besides, the S-ICD™ performance and defibrillation efficacy in conditions of adverse structural remodelling as exemplified for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is discussed. In addition, we review recent data on potential device interactions between S-ICD™ systems and other implantable cardio-active systems (e.g. pacemakers) including specific recommendations, how these could be prevented. Finally, we evaluate limitations of S-ICD™ therapy in adverse patient constitutions, like distinct obesity, and present contemporary strategies to assure proper S-ICD™ performance in these patients. Overall, the S-ICD™ performance is promising even for many patients, who may not be 'classical' candidates for this technology.

Digitalis Promotes Ventricular Arrhythmias in Flecainide- and Ranolazine-Pretreated Hearts.

A post hoc analysis of the PALLAS trial suggested life-threatening interactions of digitalis and dronedarone. Thus, there is concern about an interplay between digitalis and other drugs that influence cardiac electrophysiology. We therefore investigated the interaction between digitalis and flecainide or ranolazine. Twenty-five rabbit hearts were Langendorff-perfused and treated with flecainide (2 µM, 12 hearts) or ranolazine (10 µM, 13 hearts). Infusion of flecainide prolonged mean action potential duration [APD90, from 153 ms (interquartile range (IQR): 29.7 ms) to 159 ms (IQR: 24.9 ms, p = 0.04)] and effective refractory period [ERP, 170 ms (IQR: 40 ms) vs. 200 ms (IQR: 32.5 ms, p < 0.01)]. Administration of ranolazine prolonged APD90 [144 ms (IQR: 34.3 ms)) vs. 157 ms (IQR: 31.2 ms, p < 0.01)] and ERP [180 ms (IQR: 40 ms) vs. 200 ms (IQR: 30 ms, p < 0.01)]. Additional infusion of the digitalis glycoside ouabain (0.2 µM) abbreviated APD90 and ERP in both groups (flecainide: APD90: to 128 ms (IQR: 19 ms), ERP: to 170 ms (IQR: 20 ms), p < 0.01 each; ranolazine: APD90: to 141 ms (IQR: 40 ms), ERP: to 160 ms (IQR: 30 ms), p < 0.01 each). Ventricular vulnerability was assessed by a pacing protocol employing premature extra stimuli and burst stimulation. No proarrhythmic effect was observed with flecainide (1 vs. 3 episodes at baseline) or ranolazine (3 vs. 11 episodes at baseline). However, further infusion of ouabain had a proarrhythmic effect for both drugs (flecainide: 15 episodes, p = 0.04; ranolazine: 21 episodes, p = 0.09). Concomitant treatment of the sodium channel blockers flecainide or ranolazine with digitalis seems to be proarrhythmic. Abbreviation of repolarization and refractoriness that can facilitate re-entry was found as underlying mechanism.

Overexpression of the Na+ /Ca2+ exchanger influences ouabain-mediated spontaneous Ca2+ activity but not positive inotropy.

Administration of digitalis in heart failure (HF) increases quality of life but does not carry a prognostic benefit. Digitalis is an indirect inhibitor of the Na+ /Ca2+ exchanger (NCX), which is overexpressed in HF. We therefore used the cardiac glycoside ouabain in Ca2+ imaging experiments and patch-clamp experiments in isolated ventricular myocytes from nonfailing transgenic NCX overexpressor mice (OE). In field-stimulated myocytes, ouabain (1-100 µm) increased the amplitude of the Ca2+ transient in OE and wild-type (WT) similarly. Ouabain-mediated spontaneous Ca2+ -activity was significantly more pronounced in OE compared to WT myocytes at higher concentrations (100 µm). Also, at very high concentrations (1000 µm) of ouabain, the number of cells with hypercontraction leading to cell death was higher in OE. Ouabain (10 µm) shortened the action potential duration in both genotypes. Our findings suggest that the proarrhythmic but not the inotropic effects of cardiac glycosides are enhanced by increased NCX expression. This may offer an explanation for the observed lack of prognostic benefit but increased quality of life in HF, which is accompanied by NCX upregulation.

Distinct Occurrence of Proarrhythmic Afterdepolarizations in Atrial Versus Ventricular Cardiomyocytes: Implications for Translational Research on Atrial Arrhythmia.

Background: Principal mechanisms of arrhythmia have been derived from ventricular but not atrial cardiomyocytes of animal models despite higher prevalence of atrial arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation). Due to significant ultrastructural and functional differences, a simple transfer of ventricular proneness toward arrhythmia to atrial arrhythmia is critical. The use of murine models in arrhythmia research is widespread, despite known translational limitations. We here directly compare atrial and ventricular mechanisms of arrhythmia to identify critical differences that should be considered in murine models for development of antiarrhythmic strategies for atrial arrhythmia. Methods and Results: Isolated murine atrial and ventricular myocytes were analyzed by wide field microscopy and subjected to a proarrhythmic protocol during patch-clamp experiments. As expected, the spindle shaped atrial myocytes showed decreased cell area and membrane capacitance compared to the rectangular shaped ventricular myocytes. Though delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) could be evoked in a similar fraction of both cell types (80% of cells each), these led significantly more often to the occurrence of spontaneous action potentials (sAPs) in ventricular myocytes. Interestingly, numerous early afterdepolarizations (EADs) were observed in the majority of ventricular myocytes, but there was no EAD in any atrial myocyte (EADs per cell; atrial myocytes: 0 ± 0; n = 25/12 animals; ventricular myocytes: 1.5 [0-43]; n = 20/12 animals; p < 0.05). At the same time, the action potential duration to 90% decay (APD90) was unaltered and the APD50 even increased in atrial versus ventricular myocytes. However, the depolarizing L-type Ca2+ current (ICa) and Na+/Ca2+-exchanger inward current (INCX) were significantly smaller in atrial versus ventricular myocytes. Conclusion: In mice, atrial myocytes exhibit a substantially distinct occurrence of proarrhythmic afterdepolarizations compared to ventricular myocytes, since they are in a similar manner susceptible to DADs but interestingly seem to be protected against EADs and show less sAPs. Key factors in the generation of EADs like ICa and INCX were significantly reduced in atrial versus ventricular myocytes, which may offer a mechanistic explanation for the observed protection against EADs. These findings may be of relevance for current studies on atrial level in murine models to develop targeted strategies for the treatment of atrial arrhythmia.

Change of sensing vector in the subcutaneous ICD during follow-up and after device replacement.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) has been established as a valuable alternative to transvenous ICD for prevention of sudden cardiac death. The system automatically chooses the optimal sensing vector. However, during follow-up and especially after device replacement we observed a change of the suggested sensing vector in automatic setup. Therefore, we analyzed frequency and reasons of vector change and its impact on inappropriate shocks (IAS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2010 and December 2017, a total of 216 patients with S-ICD® were included in this analysis. In all patients sensing vectors at the time of implantation, during follow-up, and after device replacement were investigated. Median follow-up time was 27.3 ± 25.3 months. RESULTS: A change of the initial vector was seen in 77 patients (35.7%). The most frequent reason for vector change was the postoperative setup in supine and erect position in 54 patients (70.1%). In 12 patients (15.5%), the vector was manually changed due to inappropriate sensing and/or therapies. Routine setup during follow-up led to automatic vector change in 10 cases (13.0%). In only 1 patient the vector was manually changed due to oversensing in an exercise treadmill test. In 27 patients, the device was replaced due to battery depletion and in 6 of these patients the sensing vector was changed by the automatic setup. Vector change did not have an impact for inappropriate therapies in the follow-up; only 1 patient received an IAS due to an inadvertent vector change after device replacement. CONCLUSION: In the present study, a significant number of S-ICD® patients had a manual or automatic vector change during follow-up and after device replacement. The study underlines the importance of a thoroughly performed screening and at least two valuable sensing vectors preimplant. Further studies are needed to evaluate the necessity of a routine automatic setup during follow-up.