Ki-67 Testing in Breast Cancer: Assessing Variability With Scoring Methods and Specimen Types and the Potential Subsequent Impact on Therapy Eligibility.

Abemaciclib was originally FDA approved for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with Ki-67 expression ≥20%. However, there were no guidelines provided on which specimen to test or which scoring method to use. We performed a comprehensive study evaluating the variation in Ki-67 expression in breast specimens from 50 consecutive patients who could have been eligible for abemaciclib therapy. Three pathologists with breast expertise each performed a blinded review with 3 different manual scoring methods [estimated (EST), unweighted (UNW), and weighted (WT) (WT recommended by the International Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Working Group)]. Quantitative image analysis (QIA) using the HALO platform was also performed. Three different specimen types [core needle biopsy (CNB) (n=63), resection (RES) (n=52), and axillary lymph node metastasis (ALN) (n=50)] were evaluated for each patient. The average Ki-67 for all specimens was 14.68% for EST, 14.46% for UNW, 14.15% for WT, and 11.15% for QIA. For the manual methods, the range between the lowest and highest Ki-67 for each specimen between the 3 pathologists was 8.44 for EST, 5.94 for WT, and 5.93 for UNW. The WT method limited interobserver variability with ICC1=0.959 (EST ICC1=0.922 and UNW=0.949). Using the aforementioned cutoff of Ki-67 ≥20% versus <20% to determine treatment eligibility, the averaged EST method yields 20 of 50 patients (40%) who would have been treatment-eligible, versus 15 (30%) for the UNW, 17 (34%) for the WT, and 12 (24%) for the QIA. There was no statistically significant difference in Ki-67 among the 3 specimen types. The average Ki-67 difference was 4.36 for CNB vs RES, 6.95 for CNB versus ALN, and RES versus ALN (P=0.93, 0.99, and 0.94, respectively). Our study concludes that further refinement in Ki-67 scoring is advisable to reduce clinically significant variation.

TRPS1 expression in primary and metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma, muscle invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma, and breast carcinoma: Is TRPS1 truly specific and sensitive for a breast primary?

Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) has been reported to be a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical (IHC) marker for breast carcinomas, especially when determining primary site of origin. However, there is limited data on TRPS1 expression in prostate and bladder cancers. A two-phase study was performed with 1) an exploratory cohort analyzing TRPS1 gene alterations in prostate, bladder, and breast carcinoma and TPRS1 mRNA expression data in prostate and bladder carcinoma; and 2) TRPS1 and GATA3 IHC in a confirmatory cohort in prostate, bladder, and breast carcinoma samples. Gene alterations were identified in a subset of breast, bladder, and prostate carcinomas and mRNA was consistently detected. In the IHC cohort, 183/210 (87.1 %) of breast, 22/69 (31.9 %) of prostate, and 20/73 (27.4 %) of urothelial carcinomas showed staining with TRPS1. Intermediate to high expression of TRPS1 was observed in 173/210 (82.8 %) of breast, 17/69 (24.6 %) of prostate, and 15/73 (20.5 %) of urothelial carcinomas. Furthermore, in prostate cancer, 26.9 % of pelvic lymph node metastases and 50 % in sites of distant metastases showed expression. Increased TRPS1 mRNA expression (p = 0.032) and IHC expression (p = 0.040) correlated with worse overall survival in bladder cancer. By comparison, GATA3 IHC stained 136/210 (64.8 %) of breast, 0/69 (0 %) of prostate, and 63/73 (93 %) of bladder carcinomas. Intermediate to high expression of GATA3 was seen in 131/210 (62.4 %) of breast and 63/73 (93 %) of bladder carcinomas. This study shows there is significant staining of TRPS1 in bladder and prostate cancers. As a result, comprehensive studies are needed to establish the true specificity of TRPS1 IHC stain across various tumor types before its widespread clinical adoption.

Adenosquamous proliferation in radial sclerosing lesions: Histologic spectrum and key features in systematic review of 247 lesions.

Adenosquamous proliferation (ASP) is known to occur in the central nidus of radial sclerosing lesions (RSL) of the breast. However, their significance is debated and remains largely unknown. In addition, there is a histologic overlap between ASP and low-grade adenosquamous carcinomas (LGASC). We conducted a large retrospective review of 247 RSLs to evaluate the prevalence of ASP and quantitatively analyze associated histologic features of RSLs including size, stromal cellularity, and presence of chronic inflammation. The central nidus of RSLs were classified as hyalinized in 121 cases (49%), cellular in 37 cases (15%), and equally mixed hyalinized and cellular in 89 (36%). ASP occurred in 92 of 247 RSLs (37.2%). Cases with ASP were significantly associated with a cellular stroma; 78.4% of RSLS with cellular stroma had ASP versus just 11.6% of hyalinized RSLs. In our large cohort, inflammation is commonly found in RSLs with ASP (p= <0.001). In conclusion, we confirm that ASP is statistically more likely to be found in RSLs with a cellular stroma. In addition, ASP is commonly associated with chronic inflammation. The finding challenges the notion that prominent lymphocytes are a diagnostic clue to LGASC on limited biopsy material.

Breast lesions associated with mammographic architectural distortion: a study of 588 core needle biopsies.

Architectural distortion (AD) on mammography is a localized alteration in the uniform texture of the breast characterized by lines radiating from a central point. Radiologic/pathologic correlation is challenging because the types of lesions associated with AD are not well defined and, thus, what signifies a discordant finding requiring excision is less clear. This retrospective case series was performed to elucidate the pathologic lesions associated with AD. Over a 6-year period, 588 core needle biopsies (CNBs) were performed for AD. Thirty-eight percent of the lesions were AD alone (single feature AD) and 62% had additional imaging features (multi-feature AD). Overall, 31% showed invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 37% showed benign lesions likely to correlate with AD, and 32% showed nonspecific benign findings. The invasive carcinomas tended to be low-grade (60%), ER-positive (98%), HER2-negative (98%), and often had lobular features (52%). Ninety-two percent were AJCC pathologic stage group I. Ninety-four cases of benign findings that correlated with AD without atypia underwent excision, and only one was found to have DCIS adjacent to the sclerosing lesion (1%). The remaining cases had benign findings without a clear correlate for AD. Sixty-eight cases without atypia underwent excision, and six multi-feature AD were upgraded to invasive carcinoma (9%). In conclusion, about one-third of CNBs for lesions associated with AD reveal carcinomas that are predominantly invasive, low-grade, ER-positive, HER2-negative, and low stage. Single-feature AD differed from multi-feature AD due to a lower number of carcinomas on CNB (18% vs 39%). For CNBs showing benign lesions on biopsy with a correlate for AD, the finding of malignancy on excision is low (1%). Radiologic/pathologic correlation and decisions to recommend excision will continue to be a challenge after CNB reveals nonspecific findings as some patients with multi-feature AD were found to have undetected invasive carcinomas.

Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma: A Concise Review for the Practicing Pathologist and Clinician.

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy, accounting for more than 14,000 deaths each year. With no established way to prevent or screen for it, the vast majority of cases are diagnosed as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or higher. Individuals with germline BRCA mutations are at particularly high risk for epithelial ovarian cancer and have been the subject of many risk-reducing strategies. In the past ten years, studies looking at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in this population have uncovered an interesting association: up to 8% of women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who underwent RRSO had an associated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). The importance of this finding is highlighted by the fact that up to 60% of ovarian cancer patients will also have an associated STIC. These studies have led to a paradigm shift that a subset of epithelial ovarian cancer originates not in the ovarian epithelium, but rather in the distal fallopian tube. In response to this, many providers have changed their practice by expanding the role of routine salpingectomy, hysterectomy, and sterilization procedures. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has acknowledged opportunistic salpingectomy as a safe strategy to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in Committee Opinion #774. It is thus important for pathologists and clinicians to understand the definition of STIC; how it is diagnosed; and, most importantly, its clinical significance.