Characteristics Associated With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Case-Control Study.

IMPORTANCE: Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) affect 2-10% of adult women and are associated with a significant effect on quality of life, daily activities, and mental health. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify clinical characteristics associated with rUTIs among women seeking care for pelvic floor disorders at an academic tertiary urogynecology clinic. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study of women presenting to an academic tertiary urogynecology clinic was conducted. Cases were women with rUTIs, defined as ≥2 UTIs in 6 months or ≥3 within 1 year. Controls were women with no culture documented UTIs. Cases were matched 2:1 to controls by age and body mass index. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between cases and controls, and bivariate characteristics with P values ≤0.2 were assessed for an independent association with rUTIs by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 285 cases with rUTIs were identified, and 150 matched controls had a mean (SD) age of 72 (11.8) years and a body mass index of 29.6 (6.7; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Multivariable analysis revealed that prolapse beyond the introitus (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.60), parity (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.08-1.64), Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.37-2.03), and postvoid residual volume ≥100 mL (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 2.01, 8.18) were associated with rUTIs. CONCLUSIONS: In this ambulatory urogynecologic population, prolapse through the introitus was negatively associated with rUTIs, whereas parity, increased medical comorbidities, and elevated postvoid residual volume were positively associated with rUTI. Future research should seek an increased understanding of these factors associated with rUTI to implement effective preventive strategies.

COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and perceived risk among pregnant and non-pregnant adults in Cameroon, Africa.

BACKGROUND: The public health response to the global COVID-19 pandemic has varied widely by region. In Africa, uptake of effective COVID-19 vaccines has been limited by accessibility and vaccine hesitancy. The aim of this study was to compare perceptions of COVID-19 infection and vaccination between pregnant women and non-pregnant adults in four regions of Cameroon, located in Central Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted at urban and suburban hospital facilities in Cameroon. Participants were randomly selected from a convenience sample of adult pregnant and non-pregnant adults in outpatient clinical settings between June 1st and July 14th, 2021. A confidential survey was administered in person by trained research nurses after obtaining written informed consent. Participants were asked about self-reported sociodemographics, medical comorbidities, perceptions of COVID-19 infection, and vaccination. Descriptive statistics were used for survey responses and univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were created to explore factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptability. RESULTS: Fewer than one-third of participants were interested in receiving the COVID-19 vaccine (31%, 257/835) and rates did not differ by pregnancy status. Overall, 43% of participants doubted vaccine efficacy, and 85% stated that the vaccine available in Africa was less effective than vaccine available in Europe. Factors independently associated with vaccine acceptability included having children (aOR = 1.5; p = 0.04) and higher education (aOR = 1.6 for secondary school vs primary/none; p = 0.03). Perceived risks of vaccination ranged from death (33%) to fetal harm (31%) to genetic changes (1%). Health care professionals were cited as the most trusted source for health information (82%, n = 681). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and misinformation in Cameroon was highly prevalent among pregnant and non-pregnant adults in 2021 while vaccine was available but not recommended for use in pregnancy. Based on study findings, consistent public health messaging from medical professionals about vaccine safety and efficacy and local production of vaccine are likely to improve acceptability.