Increased Risk of Diabetes after Definitive Radiotherapy in Patients with Indolent Gastroduodenal Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on the risk of diabetes by assessing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in patients with gastroduodenal indolent lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with stage I extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue or follicular lymphoma of the gastroduodenal region who were treated with Helicobacter pylori eradication and/or RT between 2000 and 2019 in our institution. Of total 79 patients with HbA1c test, 17 patients received RT (RT group), while 62 patients did not receive RT (control group). A diabetes-associated event (DAE) was defined as a ≥ 0.5% increase in HbA1c levels from baseline, and diabetes event (DE) were defined as HbA1c level of ≥ 6.5%. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 49 months, no local failure occurred after RT and no patients died of lymphoma. The RT group had significantly higher risk for DAEs on univariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64 to 10.66; p < 0.01) and multivariable analysis (HR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.42 to 9.56; p=0.01). Further, the DE risk was significantly higher in the RT group than in the control group (HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.08 to 17.30; p=0.04) and in patients with increased baseline HbA1c levels (HR, 35.83; 95% CI, 2.80 to 459.19; p=0.01). On multivariable analysis, RT significantly increased the risk of DEs (HR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.08 to 19.19; p=0.04), even after adjusting baseline HbA1c level (HR, 40.97; 95% CI, 3.06 to 548.01; p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients who received RT for gastroduodenal indolent lymphoma had an increased risk of diabetes compared to those who did not.

Comparison of Dose Distribution in Regional Lymph Nodes in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy vs. Whole-Breast Plus Regional Lymph Node Irradiation: An In Silico Planning Study in Participating Institutions of the Phase III Randomized Trial (KROG 1701).

The purpose of the current in silico planning study is to compare radiation doses of whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and whole-breast plus regional lymph node irradiation (WBI+RNI) administered to the regional lymph nodes (RLN) in pN1 breast cancer. Twenty-four participating institutions were asked to create plans of WBI and WBI+RNI for two dummy cases. To compare target coverage between the participants, an isodose line equal to 90% of the prescribed dose was converted to an isodose contour (contour90% iso). The relative nodal dose (RND) was obtained using the ratio of RLN dose to the target dose. The Fleiss's kappa values which represent inter-observer agreement of contour90% iso were over 0.68. For RNI, 6 institutions included axillary lymph node (ALN), supraclavicular lymph node (SCN), and internal mammary lymph node (IMN), while 18 hospitals included only ALN and SCN. The median RND between the WBI and WBI+RNI were as follows: 0.64 vs. 1.05 (ALN level I), 0.27 vs. 1.08 (ALN level II), 0.02 vs. 1.12 (ALN level III), 0.01 vs. 1.12 (SCN), and 0.54 vs. 0.82 (IMN). In all nodal regions, the RND was significantly lower in WBI than in WBI+RNI (p < 0.01). In this study, we could identify the nodal dose difference between WBI and WBI+RNI.

Determining whether postoperative chemoradiotherapy is required in patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer with negative resection margin.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for locoregional recurrence (LR) and determine possible candidates for postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in pathologic T3N0 (pT3N0) rectal cancer patients with a negative resection margin after total mesorectal excision (TME). METHOD: Data from 365 patients who had pT3N0 rectal cancer between 2003 and 2012 in the Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. All patients underwent upfront surgery without preoperative treatment. Postoperative management involved either no adjuvant therapy (n = 122), chemotherapy alone (n = 100), or CCRT (n = 143). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 71 months. The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and LR-free survival (LRFS) rates were 95.9%, 86.9%, and 96.3%, respectively. When comparing the three groups (surgery alone [n = 122], chemotherapy alone [n = 100], and CCRT [n = 143]), there was no significant difference in LRFS among them (94.0%, 93.4%, and 99.2%, respectively; p = 0.20). However, when patients were stratified by risk factors (distance from anal verge ≤ 5 cm and distal resection margin [DRM] ≤ 2 cm), the 5-year LRFS improved by more than 10% by adding CCRT (98.9% with CCRT vs. 87.4% without CCRT, p = 0.006) in those with more than one risk factor. Postoperative CCRT did not affect the 5-year LRFS (100% with CCRT vs. 99.0% without CCRT, p = 0.66) in patients with no risk factors. CONCLUSION: Postoperative CCRT significantly decreased LR in patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer with a negative resection margin but having a distance from the anal verge ≤ 5 cm or DRM ≤ 2 cm.

Survival and Prognostic Factors for Breast Cancer Patients with Regional Oligo-Recurrence.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors for regional oligo-recurrence in breast cancer patients who received salvage local treatment. METHODS: In the breast cancer registry of our institution, 18,790 patients received curative surgery for stage I-III breast cancer between January 1995 and June 2016. Of those patients, only 87 (0.5%)underwent salvage local treatment for isolated nodal recurrence on the axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) (n = 58), supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCNs) (n = 17), or internal mammary lymph nodes (IMNs) (n = 12). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration after regional oligo-recurrence was 49 months (range: 6-194 months). For patients with recurrence of ALN, SCN, or IMN, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 40.0%, 32.1%, and 25.0%, respectively (p = 0.3) and 62.7%, 70.0%, and 58.3%, respectively(p = 0.97). In the multivariable analysis for PFS, age at recurrence ≥ 65 years, disease-free interval < 24 months, non-luminal A subtype, and in-field failure (marginally significant) were found to be risk factors (RFs). However, the location of the tumor was not a significant factor for PFS (p = 0.71). When we stratified patients by the number of RFs, the 5-year PFS rates were 67.5% for patients with ≤ 1 RF and 7.3% for those with > 1 RF (p < 0.01). For patients with ≤ 1 RF, the 5-year PFS rates were 73.5% in the ALN group and 51.1% in the SCN/IMN group (p = 0.09). For patients with > 1 RF, the 5-year PFS rates were 7.3% in the ALN group and 7.1% in the SCN/IMN group (p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: In breast cancer patients with regional oligo-recurrence, clinical outcomes after salvage treatment were favorable in patients with ≤ 1 RF, while patients with > 1 RF had poor prognoses irrespective of the location of recurrence.

Risk factors for locoregional recurrence in patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer with negative resection margin treated by surgery alone.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in pT3N0 rectal cancer patients who were treated with surgery alone and had negative resection margin including circumferential resection margin (CRM) for optimal indication of adjuvant radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer who were treated via upfront surgery and had no other adjuvant treatment from January 2003 to December 2012. In total, 122 patients who had negative resection margin including negative CRM were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up period after surgery was 60 months (range, 3 to 161 months). During this time, 6 patients (4.9%) experienced LRR at the anastomotic site (4 patients), and regional lymphatic area (2 patients). The estimated 5-year rates of overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and LRR-free survival were 96.7%, 84.6%, and 94.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that level of tumor ≤5 cm was a significant prognostic factor for LRR-free survival (LRRFS) (p = 0.04; hazard ratio = 7.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-47.30). Patients with level of tumor ≤5 cm had an estimated 5-year LRRFS of 66.8%, which was much higher than 2.3% in patients with level of tumor >5 cm. There was no significant factor for recurrence-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSION: In T3N0 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be recommended in patients with level of tumor ≤5 cm for better local control. However, in patients with pT3N0 disease, negative resection margin, and level of tumor >5 cm, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be carefully suggested.

Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil for inhibiting response to laryngeal mask airway removal during emergence.

PURPOSE: This randomized, controlled, double-blind study was designed to determine the optimal dose of remifentanil for preventing complications associated with the removal of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) without delaying emergence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study randomly assigned 128 patients to remifentanil effect-site concentrations (Ce) of 0 ng/mL (group R0), 0.5 ng/mL (group R0.5), 1.0 ng/mL (group R1.0), and 1.5 ng/mL (group R1.5) during emergence. The emergence and recovery profiles were recorded. Adverse events such as coughing, airway obstruction, breath-holding, agitation, desaturation, nausea, and vomiting were also evaluated. RESULTS: The number of patients with respiratory complications such as coughing and breath-holding was significantly lower in the R1.0 and R1.5 groups than in the R0 group (p<0.05). Emergence agitation also decreased in the R1.0 and R1.5 groups (p<0.0083). The time to LMA removal was significantly longer in the R1.5 group than in the other groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Maintaining a remifentanil Ce of 1.0 ng/mL during emergence may suppress adverse events such as coughing, breath-holding, and agitation following the removal of LMA without delayed awakening.