Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist modulates the early phase of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in mice.

BACKGROUND: Cytokine administration is a potential therapy for acute liver failure by reducing inflammatory responses and favour hepatocyte regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) during liver regeneration and to study the effect of a recombinant human IL-1ra on liver regeneration. METHODS: We performed 70%-hepatectomy in wild type (WT) mice, IL-1ra knock-out (KO) mice and in WT mice treated by anakinra. We analyzed liver regeneration at regular intervals by measuring the blood levels of cytokines, the hepatocyte proliferation by bromodeoxyuridin (BrdU) incorporation, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Cyclin D1 expression. The effect of anakinra on hepatocyte proliferation was also tested in vitro using human hepatocytes. RESULTS: At 24h and at 48 h after hepatectomy, IL-1ra KO mice had significantly higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1ß and MCP-1) and a reduced and delayed hepatocyte proliferation measured by BrdU incorporation, PCNA and Cyclin D1 protein levels, when compared to WT mice. IGFBP-1 and C/EBPß expression was significantly decreased in IL-1ra KO compared to WT mice. WT mice treated with anakinra showed significantly decreased levels of IL-6 and significantly higher hepatocyte proliferation at 24h compared to untreated WT mice. In vitro, primary human hepatocytes treated with anakinra showed significantly higher proliferation at 24h compared to hepatocytes without treatment. CONCLUSION: IL1ra modulates the early phase of liver regeneration by decreasing the inflammatory stress and accelerating the entry of hepatocytes in proliferation. IL1ra might be a therapeutic target to improve hepatocyte proliferation.

Cure of multifocal panhepatic hepatoblastoma: is liver transplantation always necessary?

PURPOSE: Multifocal panhepatic hepatoblastoma (HB) without extrahepatic disease is generally considered as an indication for total hepatectomy and liver transplantation. However, after initial chemotherapy, downstaging of the tumor sometimes allows complete macroscopic resection by partial hepatectomy. This procedure is no longer recommended because of the risk of persistent viable tumor cells in the hepatic remnant. We report our experience with conservative surgery in such cases. METHOD: Between 2000 and 2005, 4 children were consecutively referred to our unit with multinodular pan-hepatic HBs (classification PRETEXT IV of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology Liver Tumor Study Group SIOPEL). Three of them had extrahepatic disease at diagnosis. All patients were treated according to SIOPEL 3 and 4 protocols. RESULTS: Extrahepatic metastases were still viable in 2 of 3 patients after initial chemotherapy. These patients eventually died of tumor recurrence. In the 2 patients without residual extrahepatic disease, liver tumors had regressed, and complete macroscopic excision of hepatic tumor remnants could be achieved by conservative surgery. These 2 children are alive and well and free of tumor 7 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative surgery may be curative in some multinodular PRETEXT IV HB patients, with a good response to preoperative chemotherapy and complete excision of all macroscopic tumor remnants. However, because of the lack of reliable predictors of sterilization of the microscopic disease in the residual liver, with subsequent poor prognosis, total hepatectomy and liver transplantation remain currently recommended in patients with multinodular PRETEXT IV HB without extrahepatic disease, even though some of these children are probably overtreated.