Predictive value of laboratory markers in the development of cardiac events in patients with stable coronary artery disease after elective endovascular revascularization.

Aim      To reveal a relationship between preprocedural laboratory data and adverse cardiac outcomes (CO) in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) following elective endovascular revascularization (ER).Material and methods  This study included 225 patients with IHD admitted for treatment to the Research Institute of Cardiology of the Tomsk National Research Medical Center. The study included patients with documented IHD and hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses requiring elective ER. Patients were divided into groups based on the presence of complications: group 1, 98 patients with adverse CO and group 2, 127 patients without adverse CO. Besides evaluation of complaints, history, and objective status, general clinical and biochemical tests were performed for all patients. Concentration of glycated hemoglobin (НbА1с) was measured by immunoturbidimetry (DiaSys Diagnostic Systems). Serum concentrations of insulin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), endothelin 1 (ET-1), and homocysteine were measured by enzyme immunoassay. Blood lipid profile was determined by enzymatic colorimetry (DiaSys). Content of non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol (CS) was calculated as: CS - HDL CS. Insulin resistance (IR) was assessed by the HOMА-IR index. IR was diagnosed at the index of 2.77. Statistical analyses were performed with Statistica 10.0 and Medcalc 19.2.6 software.Results A one-way regression analysis identified predictors for adverse CO following ER. The most significant predictors were fibrinogen (odds ratio (OR), 1.430; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.027-1.990), HbA1c (OR 1.825; 95 % CI, 1.283-2.598), homocysteine (OR, 1.555; 95 % CI, 1.348-1.794), ET-1 (OR, 94.408; 95 % CI, 16.762-531.720), triglycerides (TG)/glucose ratio (OR 1.815; 95 % CI, 1.155-2.853). Based on selected factors, logistic regression models were constructed. However, not all models had a high prognostic power. Only concentrations of ET-1 and homocysteine showed a high prognostic capability in respect of the adverse outcome (88.3 and 85.7 %, respectively).Conclusion      For patients with IHD, the prognostic capability of ET-1 and homocysteine with respect of the risk for adverse CO following ER was the highest compared to other markers. The results of the study are completely consistent with data of literature and can be successfully used in clinical practice for optimizing the medical care of patients after elective ER.

Refractory and Resistant Hypertension in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Different Response to Renal Denervation.

Aim      To compare the antihypertensive effectivity of renal denervation in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and associated refractory arterial hypertension (rfAH) (treated with 5 or more classes of antihypertensive drugs, including a thiazide diuretic and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist) and uncontrolled resistant AH (ucAH) (treated with 3-4 drugs).Material and methods  This interventional study with renal denervation included 18 DM patients with rfAH and 40 DM patients with ucAH; 16 and 36 of them, respectively, completed the study in 6 months. At baseline, patients were sex- and age-matched. Study methods included measurement of office blood pressure (BP; systolic/diastolic BP, SBP/DBP); outpatient BP monitoring; evaluation of kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate by the CKD-EPI formula); diurnal diuresis volume; diurnal urinary excretion of albumin, potassium and sodium; diurnal excretion of metanephrines and normetanephrines; and plasma levels of glucose and glycated hemoglobin, aldosterone, and active renin. Patients were instructed about maintaining compliance with their antihypertensive and hypoglycemic therapy throughout the study.Results At baseline, patients of both groups were comparable by BP and major clinical indexes, except for higher values of nocturnal SBP variability (p<0.05) in patients with rfAH. At 6 months following renal denervation, both groups displayed significant decreases in office and average daily SBP and also in the "load" with increased mean diurnal SBP. However, the decrease in average daily SBP was almost 4 times greater in the rfAH group than in the ucAH group ( -19.9 and -5.1 mm Hg, respectively, р=0.02). Moreover, 81 % of patients in the rfAH group responded to the intervention (average daily SBP decrease ≥10 mm Hg) while the number of responders in the ucAH group was considerably smaller (42 %; p=0.02). In patients with rfAH, renal denervation was associated with a significant decrease in pulse BP and nocturnal SBP variability and with the increase in diurnal diuresis. No other alterations were noted in laboratory test results in either group.Conclusion      DM patients with rfAH may be the best candidates for the procedure of renal denervation.

Two-Stage Revascularization in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Massive Coronary Thrombosis.

AIM: to investigate safety and angiographic efficacy of two-stage revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting delayed by one day in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and massive coronary thrombosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included in this study 12 patients with massive infarct related coronary artery thrombus which length was greater than thrice the vessel diameter in the presence of TIMI grade II-III blood flow as detected by coronary angiography (CAG). The emergency PCI was not performed, and conservative antithrombotic therapy continued for 24 hours. After this day, CAG was repeated. RESULTS: Repeat CAG in all patients showed thrombus regression which visually appeared as complete lysis in 8, and partial lysis - in 4 patients. Stenting of residual stenosis was performed in 11 patients without complications. In 1 patient residual stenosis was considered insignificant (<50 %) therefore stenting was not performed. No-reflowphenomenon and recurrent MI were not observed. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that in patients with massive coronary artery thrombosis conservative antithrombotic therapy for 24 hours followed by repeated CAG and, if required, by stenting of residual stenosis, is safe treatment tactics that might reduce the risk of the no-reflow phenomenon.