RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Poverty amongst families with a child with disability adversely impacts child and family quality of life. We aimed to identify existing approaches to livelihood support for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: This mixed-method study incorporated a scoping literature review and online stakeholder survey. We utilised the World Health Organization community-based rehabilitation (CBR) matrix as a guiding framework for knowledge synthesis and descriptively analysed the included articles and survey responses. RESULTS: We included 11 peer-reviewed publications, 6 grey literature articles, and 49 survey responses from stakeholders working in 22 countries. Identified programmes reported direct and indirect strategies for livelihood support targeting multiple elements of the CBR matrix; particularly skills development, access to social protection measures, and self-employment; frequently in collaboration with specialist partners, and as one component of a wider intervention. Self-help groups were also common. No publications examined effectiveness of livelihood support approaches in mitigating poverty, with most describing observational studies at small scale. CONCLUSION: Whilst stakeholders describe a variety of direct and indirect approaches to livelihood support for caregivers of children with disabilities, there is a lack of published literature on content, process, and impact to inform future programme development and delivery.
Disability and poverty are interlinked, but little is known on approaches to livelihood support for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities in low- and middle-income countries.Stakeholders report direct and indirect strategies for livelihood support targeting multiple livelihood elements; particularly skills development, access to social protection measures and self-employment; frequently in collaboration with specialist partners, and as one component of a wider intervention.Improved reporting of livelihood targeted activities inclusive of evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and impact would support wider implementation of effective livelihood programmes for caregivers of children with disability.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a large, unmet need for acute and chronic wound care worldwide. Application of proven therapies such as negative-pressure wound therapy in resource-constrained settings is limited by cost and lack of electrical supply. To provide an alternative to existing electrically powered negative-pressure wound therapy systems, a bellows-powered negative-pressure wound therapy system was designed and iteratively improved during field-based testing. The authors describe the design process and the results of safety and biomechanical testing of their simplified negative-pressure wound therapy system. METHODS: Simplified negative-pressure wound therapy was tested at two hospitals in Rwanda. Patients with wounds ranging from 2 to 150 cm and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Wounds were categorized by difficulty of dressing application according to location and contour. Outcomes were maintenance of negative pressure and occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with 42 wounds were treated with simplified negative-pressure wound therapy. Eighty-five dressings in total were applied. On average, the final simplified negative-pressure wound therapy dressing maintained negative pressure for 31.7 hours on all wounds (n = 37), and 52.7 hours on wounds in easy-to-dress locations. No unexpected adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic report of the performance of a bellows-powered negative-pressure wound therapy device designed specifically for use in resource-constrained settings. The authors found that elimination of air leaks in the simplified negative-pressure wound therapy dressing is essential, and that their system is safe and feasible for use in these environments. Subsequent trials will study the system's efficacy.
