1.
PLoS Biol
; 13(11): e1002301, 2015 Nov.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26556632
RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273.].
2.
PLoS Biol
; 13(10): e1002273, 2015 Oct.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26460723
RESUMEN
The reliability of experimental findings depends on the rigour of experimental design. Here we show limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in a random sample of life sciences publications, significantly lower reporting of randomisation in work published in journals of high impact, and very limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in publications from leading United Kingdom institutions. Ascertainment of differences between institutions might serve both as a measure of research quality and as a tool for institutional efforts to improve research quality.