Correlation of Ultrasound Scores with Endoscopic Activity in Crohn's Disease: A Prospective Exploratory Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intestinal ultrasound [IUS] is widely accepted as a reliable tool to monitor Crohn's disease [CD]. Several IUS scores have been proposed, but none has been formally accepted by international organizations. Our aim here was to compare the available scores regarding their correlation with endoscopic activity. METHODS: Consenting CD patients undergoing ileocolonoscopy at our Unit between September 2021 and February 2023 were included. Endoscopic activity was defined as SES-CD ≥ 3 or Rutgeerts score ≥ i2b for operated patients. IUS was performed within 6 weeks of endoscopy and scored with IBUS-SAS, BUSS, Simple-US and SUS-CD scores. All correlations were performed using Spearman's rank coefficient [rho = ρ]. Receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves were compared with the Hanley and McNeil method. RESULTS: Of 73 CD patients, 45 [61.6%] presented endoscopic activity, of whom 22 were severe [30.1%]. All IUS scores showed a significant positive correlation with endoscopy [p < 0.0001], with IBUS-SAS ranking the highest [ρ = 0.87]. Similarly, IBUS-SAS was the most highly correlated with clinical activity [ρ = 0.58]. ROC analysis of IBUS-SAS for any endoscopic activity showed the highest area under the curve (0.95 [95% confidence interval 0.87-0.99]), with sensitivity of 82.2% and specificity of 100% for a cut-off value of 25.2. IBUS-SAS was statistically superior to all the other scores in detecting severe endoscopic activity [SES-CD ≥ 9 or Rutgeerts i4]. CONCLUSIONS: All IUS scores provided solid correlation with endoscopy and clinical symptoms. IBUS-SAS outperformed the others due to a more granular description that might help in stratifying different levels of disease activity. Therefore, the use of IBUS-SAS in centres with well-founded expertise in IUS can be suggested.

Pregnancy outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: Data from a large cohort survey.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can affect young and reproductively active patients. Our aim was to analyze pregnancy outcomes in a large cohort of women with IBD. METHODS: All women with at least one pregnancy were given a questionnaire regarding the outcome of their pregnancy. They were divided into IBD pregnancies and controls depending on whether pregnancy occurred within or over 10 years prior to the diagnosis of IBD. RESULTS: Three hundred questionnaires were analyzed for a total of 478 pregnancies that led to live-born babies. Age at conception was older in IBD women than in the controls. Active smoking was more frequent in the control group. The risk of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was higher in IBD pregnancies (odds ratio [OR] 3.028, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.245-7.370, P = 0.013). The week of gestation at delivery was lower in the IBD population. And the risk of cesarean section was higher in IBD pregnancies (OR 1.963, 95% CI 1.274-3.028, P = 0.002). Among women with IBD pregnancy, the risk of preterm birth was higher in patients with active disease at the time of conception (OR 4.088, 95% CI 1.112-15.025, P = 0.030), but lower in patients who continued regular therapy during pregnancy. Similarly, the risk of urgent cesarean section was reduced in the case of disease remission, while the risk of a planned cesarean delivery was higher in patients with perianal disease (OR 11.314, 95% CI 3.550-36.058, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a higher risk of IUGR, cesarean section, and poor blood pressure control in IBD pregnancies. We emphasize the importance of achieving disease remission before considering pregnancy.

Effectiveness and Safety of Nonmedical Switch From Adalimumab Originator to SB5 Biosimilar in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Twelve-Month Follow-Up From the TABLET Registry.

BACKGROUND: Few data are currently available about SB5 in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of SB5 in a cohort of patients with IBD in stable remission switched from the adalimumab (ADA) originator and in a cohort of patients with IBD naïve to ADA. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with IBD who started ADA treatment with SB5 (naïve cohort) and those who underwent a nonmedical switch from the ADA originator to SB5 (switching cohort). Clinical remission and safety were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. In addition, in a small cohort of patients who were switched, we assessed the ADA serum trough levels and antidrug antibodies at baseline, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: In the naïve cohort, the overall remission rate at 12 months was 60.42%, whereas in the switching cohort it was 89.02%. Fifty-three (36.3%) patients experienced an adverse event, and injection site pain was the most common; it was significantly more frequent in the switching cohort (P = 0.001). No differences were found in terms of ADA serum trough levels at baseline, 3, and 6 months after switching. No patient developed antidrug antibodies after the switch. CONCLUSIONS: We found that SB5 seemed effective and safe in IBD, both in the naïve cohort and in the switching cohort. Further studies are needed to confirm these data in terms of mucosal healing.

Infliximab is more effective than cyclosporine as a rescue therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening disease, and the best option in cases of steroid-refractory disease is still debated. We compared the early- and long-term efficacy and safety of the 2 available "rescue therapies", infliximab (IFX) and cyclosporine (CYS), in this setting. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients admitted for ASUC and treated with "rescue therapy". The primary endpoint was early colectomy-free survival (30 days) and colectomy-free survival until the end of follow up. The secondary endpoints were predictors of colectomy and long-term maintenance of the treatment strategy over time. RESULTS: Of 129 patients admitted, 68 received rescue therapy (47 with IFX), whereas 7 underwent early colectomy (10.3%). At 30 days, fewer patients treated with IFX showed a need for colectomy (8.5% vs. 14.3%) compared to those in the CYS group, though the difference was non-significant (odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-4.69; P=0.47). No severe side effects due to IFX and CYS were observed. During a mean follow up of 40 months, 23 additional patients (37.7%) underwent colectomy, and the rate was significantly lower in the IFX group (25.6%) than in the CYS group (66.7%) (hazard ratio 0.25, 95%CI 0.10-0.61; P=0.003). Colectomy-free survival was significantly higher in the IFX group than in the CYS group (P=0.018) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, the early outcomes of IFX and CYS for ASUC were comparable. IFX was associated with significantly lower colectomy rates during the observation period and had a similar safety profile to CYS.

Infectious risk of vedolizumab compared with other biological agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective anti-integrin (α4ß7) antibody for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with a well-known optimal safety profile. We aimed to compare its risk of infections with that of anti-TNF drugs and ustekinumab in patients with both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. METHODS: All Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients undergoing biological treatment at our centre between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively included. All infectious complications were registered, considering both inpatient and outpatient events. A comparison of the exposure-adjusted infection rates of vedolizumab, anti-TNF drugs and ustekinumab was carried out, with a specific focus on the rate of gut infections. All infection rates were expressed in events per patient-years (PYs). RESULTS: The overall exposure-adjusted infection rate was 11.5/100 PYs. The most common infections were respiratory tract infections, cutaneous infections, HSV infections/reactivations and gut infections. The rate of serious infections was 1.3/100 PYs. The infection rate of vedolizumab was 17.5/100 PYs, with Crohn's disease patients having a lower infection risk compared with ulcerative colitis patients (P = 0.035). Gut infections were observed in 3.0% of the whole patient population (1.5/100 PYs) and were more common in the vedolizumab group (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the good safety profile of vedolizumab. Among patients treated with vedolizumab, those with ulcerative colitis have a higher risk of developing infectious complications. Patients treated with vedolizumab have a higher risk of gut infections compared with patients treated with anti-TNF drugs or ustekinumab. Presumably, this is due to the gut-selective mechanism of action of vedolizumab.

The prevention and management of Crohn's disease postoperative recurrence: results from the Y-ECCO/ClinCom 2019 Survey.

BACKGROUND: Prevention and management of postoperative recurrence (POR) is a controversial field in Crohn's disease. The aim of this survey was to report common practice in real-life settings. METHODS: An 11-question survey was distributed among gastroenterologists attending the 14th European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) congress. RESULTS: Postoperative endoscopy to assess recurrence was routinely performed within 12 months by 87% of respondents. Forty-six percent of clinicians reported to maintain endoscopic assessment in routine follow-up even after first negative colonoscopy. Most respondents (60%) considered starting postoperative immunoprophylaxis in naïve patients if one or more known risk factors were present. The number of risk factors was an important driver for prescribing biologics over immunosuppressants for 60% of respondents.In case of fistulizing phenotype, perianal disease, or concomitant colonic involvement, the majority of physicians reported to start an immediate prophylaxis in 85, 98 and 88% of patients, respectively. A significant percentage of clinicians were more prone to an endoscopy-driven treatment in long-standing disease after failure of thiopurines (51%) and elderly (43%). CONCLUSION: Endoscopy within the first year after surgery to assess POR has become routine in most centres. The high rate of early prophylaxis with expensive biologics despite missing solid evidence highlights the need for more randomized trials.

Long-term efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A real-life experience from a tertiary referral center.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in a real-life cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases enrolled at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from August 2016 to November 2018. The primary outcomes were clinical response and remission at 14, 24, and 52 weeks, and steroid-free remission rate (SFRR) at 52 weeks. Endoscopic response and remission rates at 52 weeks were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Altogether 49 patients (22 with ulcerating colitis [UC] and 27 with Crohn's Disease [CD]) were enrolled. The clinical response rate gradually dropped from 85% and 50% in CD and UC, respectively, at week 14 to 59% and 25% at week 52, with significantly a higher response in CD at week 14. The endoscopic response at week 52 was 55% in CD and 25% in UC (P = 0.21). CD group had a higher SFRR than UC group (41% vs 20%) at 52 weeks, although the difference was not statistically significant. Similar clinical and endoscopic rates were observed in biologic-naive and -experienced patients. We reported no discontinuation due to adverse drug reactions, and only mild to moderate events. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort the clinical response in the induction phase was similar to those of registered trials, despite surprising better results for CD. During the maintenance phase we observed an higher drop out than in the reported literatures. Of note, its good safety profile makes vedolizumab a reliable choice in patients with contraindications to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents.

Clinical efficacy and safety of golimumab in biologically experienced and naive patients with active ulcerative colitis: A real-life experience from two Italian IBD centers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab in biological naive and experienced patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) treated at two Italian IBD centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained UC database from March 2015 to March 2017. Patients received golimumab 200 mg at week 0, 100 mg at week 2, then 50 mg or 100 mg every 4 weeks. Follow-up was recorded at 12 and 24 weeks and in March 2017, with a median follow-up of 64 weeks. The main outcomes evaluated were clinical remission (CR) and adverse event rates. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients (44% naive and 56% experienced), CR rate was 47% at 12-week follow-up, 55% (among the 49 patients on treatment) at 24-week follow-up and 49% (among 35 patients on treatment) at the last follow-up visit. Median treatment duration was 52 weeks (interquartile range 30-64 weeks) among patients treated for >6 months. Overall, 10 (17%) patients experienced adverse events, of whom 50% discontinued treatment. The most frequent adverse events were infections. Biological naive and experienced patients did not differ in terms of CR and adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-life experience showed that CR decreased over time and was achieved by almost one-third of the cohort at the last follow-up visit. Golimumab showed an overall favorable safety profile and the results were not different between biological naive and experienced patients. Future research is needed to confirm our results and to identify criteria to select patients most likely to respond.

The Kinetics of Antidrug Antibodies, Drug Levels, and Clinical Outcomes in Infliximab-Exposed Patients with Immune-Mediated Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) and loss of response (LOR) to infliximab (IFX) are related to drug immunogenicity characterized by antidrug antibodies (ADAs). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the timing of ADA appearance and its relationship with drug levels and clinical outcomes in IFX-treated patients with different diseases. METHODS: Samples were longitudinally collected before each infusion from 91 IFX-treated patients and were assayed for ADA and drug levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and for IgE by ImmunoCAP system. Clinical data regarding efficacy and safety of therapy were also monitored. RESULTS: The ADA onset occured quite early, irrespective of the type of disease, during the first year and more frequently and earlier during the second cycle of therapy. Patients with HR were more frequently ADA-positive and with higher ADA titers compared with other patient groups. ADA onset tends to precede HRs and LOR; all HRs that occur after a period of drug interruption are preceded by ADA development. Before ADA detection, a progressive decline in IFX levels until a complete disappearance was observed. The ADA titer was maintained for years both in patients with ongoing therapy and in those who interrupted it. IgE ADAs are more frequently developed in patients with higher ADA levels and earlier ADA onset, but their rate of negativization is faster. CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that most IFX-exposed patients develop ADAs within the first year of treatment irrespective of disease type. The clinical outcome to the treatment is preceded by ADA development, which in turn is associated with the reduction in drug serum levels. Both ADA evaluation and therapeutic drug monitoring may have a relevant impact on clinical practice, giving new insights to predict LOR and HRs.

Robotic rectal surgery: State of the art.

Laparoscopic rectal surgery has demonstrated its superiority over the open approach, however it still has some technical limitations that lead to the development of robotic platforms. Nevertheless the literature on this topic is rapidly expanding there is still no consensus about benefits of robotic rectal cancer surgery over the laparoscopic one. For this reason a review of all the literature examining robotic surgery for rectal cancer was performed. Two reviewers independently conducted a search of electronic databases (PubMed and EMBASE) using the key words "rectum", "rectal", "cancer", "laparoscopy", "robot". After the initial screen of 266 articles, 43 papers were selected for review. A total of 3013 patients were included in the review. The most commonly performed intervention was low anterior resection (1450 patients, 48.1%), followed by anterior resections (997 patients, 33%), ultra-low anterior resections (393 patients, 13%) and abdominoperineal resections (173 patients, 5.7%). Robotic rectal surgery seems to offer potential advantages especially in low anterior resections with lower conversions rates and better preservation of the autonomic function. Quality of mesorectum and status of and circumferential resection margins are similar to those obtained with conventional laparoscopy even if robotic rectal surgery is undoubtedly associated with longer operative times. This review demonstrated that robotic rectal surgery is both safe and feasible but there is no evidence of its superiority over laparoscopy in terms of postoperative, clinical outcomes and incidence of complications. In conclusion robotic rectal surgery seems to overcome some of technical limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery especially for tumors requiring low and ultra-low anterior resections but this technical improvement seems not to provide, until now, any significant clinical advantages to the patients.

Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has been developed with the aim of improving surgical quality and overcoming the limitations of conventional laparoscopy in the performance of complex mini-invasive procedures. The present study was designed to compare robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: Between June 2008 and September 2015, 41 laparoscopic and 30 robotic distal gastrectomies were performed by a single surgeon at the same institution. Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, surgical performance, postoperative morbidity/mortality and pathologic data were prospectively collected and compared between the laparoscopic and robotic groups by the Chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney test, as indicated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. Mean tumor size was larger in the laparoscopic than in the robotic patients (5.3 ± 0.5 cm and 3.0 ± 0.4 cm, respectively; P = 0.02). However, tumor stage distribution was similar between the two groups. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was higher in the robotic than in the laparoscopic patients (39.1 ± 3.7 and 30.5 ± 2.0, respectively; P = 0.02). The mean operative time was 262.6 ± 8.6 min in the laparoscopic group and 312.6 ± 15.7 min in the robotic group (P < 0.001). The incidences of surgery-related and surgery-unrelated complications were similar in the laparoscopic and in the robotic patients. There were no significant differences in short-term clinical outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of a small-sized, non-randomized analysis, our study confirms that robotic distal gastrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical procedure. When compared with conventional laparoscopy, robotic surgery shows evident benefits in the performance of lymphadenectomy with a higher number of retrieved and examined lymph nodes.

Total and cancer mortality in a cohort of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients: The Florence inflammatory bowel disease study, 1978-2010.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the leading causes of death among inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients. AIM: We present the results of an extended follow-up of the population-based Florence IBD cohort, including 689 ulcerative colitis and 231 Crohn's disease patients. METHODS: The causes of death of cohort members were determined through linkage with the local mortality registry. We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) by applying gender-, age- and calendar time-death rates to person-years at risk. RESULTS: Ulcerative colitis patients had overall mortality comparable to the general population (SMR 0.99, 95%CI 0.85-1.14), though being at increased risk of dying from Hodgkin's disease (SMR 11.74, 95%CI 2.94-46.94), rectal cancer (SMR 3.69, 95%CI 1.66-8.22) and Alzheimer's disease (2.40, 95%CI 1.00-5.76). Crohn's disease patients had an increased overall mortality (SMR 1.79, 95%CI 1.39-2.27) and were at higher risk of dying from cancer (SMR 2.57, 95%CI 1.28-5.13) and non-cancer diseases of the respiratory system (SMR 2.51, 95%CI 1.05-6.04), brain cancer (SMR 6.26, 95%CI 1.57-25.02) and non-cancer diseases of the genitourinary system (SMR 4.38, 95%CI 1.10-17.52). CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients should be offered counselling on risk reduction strategies, as much of their mortality excess is potentially avoidable.

Outcome of acute severe ulcerative colitis in patients previously exposed to immunosuppressive therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis previously exposed to immunosuppressive (IMS) therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 86 consecutive patients from 2008. Early outcome was evaluated as response to steroids, rescue therapy, and colectomy rate, whereas colectomy free-survival was determined along the follow-up. RESULTS: The overall response rates to steroids and rescue therapy was 33.7% and 90.5%, respectively, while early colectomy rate was 22.1%. Patients previously treated with IMS (n=47) showed a trend towards lower response to steroids (25.5% vs 43.6%; p=0.10), and a high-risk of early colectomy (29.8% vs 12.8%; p=0.07), but a similar response to rescue therapy (87.5% vs 94.4%, p=0.62) when compared with IMS-naïve patients (n=39). The overall cumulative probability to avoid the surgery was 67.5% and 56.6% at 12 and 60 months, respectively, regardless of previous exposure to IMS (p=0.30). At multivariate analysis the risk of early colectomy was increased by previous IMS (OR 5.16, p=0.017), anaemia (OR 4.26, p=0.02), and diagnosis above 40 years (OR 5.31, p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Patients previously treated with IMS showed a non-significant trend towards a worse response with steroid therapy, a satisfactory response rate to rescue therapy, and a similar probability of avoiding colectomy during the follow-up vs IMS-naive patients.

Disease Course and Colectomy Rate of Ulcerative Colitis: A Follow-up Cohort Study of a Referral Center in Tuscany.

BACKGROUND: The disease course and colectomy rate of ulcerative colitis (UC) vary largely in population-based and referral center cohorts. We retrospectively evaluated our cohort to determine the disease course and risk factors for colectomy. METHODS: A cohort of 1723 ulcerative colitis patients (986 males; mean age, 34.8 ± 15.4 yrs) were identified and followed since 1960s for a mean of 11 ± 9 years (range, 1-49 yrs). RESULTS: The disease extension was classified as E1, E2, and E3 on diagnosis at 19.7%, 54.2%, and 26.1% of patients, respectively. At the final follow-up, the disease extension increased in 20% of the cases. Extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) were reported by 11% of the patients, whereas systemic corticosteroids (CS), IM or anti-TNFα agents were used by 68.6%, 20.4%, and 6.4% of patients, respectively. The crude colectomy rate was 7% (120 pts), with a 1.2% rate (n = 21) at 1 year from diagnosis (95% CI, 0.7-1.7) and a Kaplan-Meyer estimation of up to 18.2% after 30 years of follow-up. The 1-year colectomy rate showed no significant difference through the decades, whereas the 5-year and 10-year absolute value of colectomy was halved in the last 2 decades compared with the period from 1960 to 1990 (P = 0.01), with a general trend of a reduced colectomy rate at survival curves (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The colectomy rate was low in our cohort and further reduced in the last 2 decades. However, despite the availability of anti-TNFα agents, no further significant reduction of colectomies was observed in the last decade.

Survival after laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer: a comparative, single-institution study.

BACKGROUND: Some recent studies have suggested that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer may provide a potential survival advantage when compared with open surgery. This study aimed to compare cancer-related survivals of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open resection of colon cancer in the same, high volume tertiary center. METHODS: Patients who had undergone elective open or laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer between January 2002 and December 2010 were analyzed. A clinical database was prospectively compiled. Survival analysis was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 460 resections were performed. There were no significant differences between the laparoscopic (n = 227) and the open group (n = 233) apart from tumor stage: stage I tumors were more frequent in the laparoscopic group whereas stage II tumors were more frequent in the open group. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly higher in the laparoscopic than in the open group (20.0 ± 0.7 vs 14.2 ± 0.5, P < 0.01). The 5-year cancer-related survival for patients undergoing laparoscopic resection was significantly higher than that following open resections (83.1% vs 68.5%, P = 0.01). By performing a stage-to-stage comparison, we found that the improvement in survival in the laparoscopic group occurred mainly in patients with stage II tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a survival advantage for patients who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for stage II colon cancer. This may be correlated with a higher number of harvested lymph nodes and thus a better stage stratification of these patients.

Emerging drug for diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders with a 9 - 23% prevalence estimated in the general population. Patients can be subdivided into those who tend to have predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) or predominant constipation (IBS-C). Total annual productivity loss related to IBS in US is estimated at $205 million, with a significant impairment of health-related quality of life. A gold standard for the treatment of IBS is not established. Symptoms might improve with the use of few drugs and behavioral therapy, however, data concerning efficacy, safety and tolerability are limited. Therefore, development and validation of new therapies targeting at the molecular level are widely awaited. AREAS COVERED: We will specifically describe in this review Phase II and Phase III trials, with specific focus on treatment of IBS-D patients. Unfortunately, it is difficult to draw definite conclusions from Phase II and Phase III trials, because of the known high placebo effect. EXPERT OPINION: Drugs active on opioid receptor subtypes and neurokinin (NK) receptors seem to be the most promising, but substantial progress of information in this field is still needed. The achievement of more insights on the pathogenesis of IBS could surely better drive and target the therapy, but still strong efforts are awaited.

Occult radiological sacroiliac abnormalities in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who do not present signs or symptoms of axial spondylitis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate radiological sacroiliac abnormalities in IBD patients without musculoskeletal symptoms and to determine the clinical and familiar differences between IBD patients with and without radiologic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) abnormalities. Subsequently, the patients with x-ray alterations were followed for 3 years in order to assess the onset of chronic inflammatory back pain (IBP). METHODS: 81 patients (55 Crohn-CD- and 26 ulcerative rettocolitis-UC) with remittent and low active IBD, from a tertiary referral centre of Gastroenterology Unit, were studied using SIJ x-rays. Differences in IBD clinical variables (activity and duration of CD and UC, extra-intestinal involvement, treatment with surgery and not, ESR and CRP levels), familiarity (for psoriasis, IBD, spondyloarthritis, coeliac syndrome), between patients with SIJ x-ray findings and without were investigated. Patients with radiological sacroiliac joint abnormalities were followed up clinically for 3 years and the onset of symptoms of chronic (higher than 3 consecutive months) IBP was investigated. RESULTS: 22/81 patients (27.1%) showed radiological SIJ abnormalities at baseline: isolated sclerosis in 17/22 (77.3%) and localised erosions in 12/22 (54.5%). Radiological SIJ involvement did not correlate with IBD clinical and familial variables. All patients were HLA B27 negative. At 3 years, 4/22 patients (18.1%) presented chronic IBP symptoms with bone oedema at MRI. CONCLUSIONS: In IBD, occult radiological SIJ alterations might precede the onset of axial symptoms but, in the absence of clinical signs, it is not possible to identify some IBD features or familiar predisposition that might be more frequent when SIJ abnormalities are involved. Clinical follow-up might be useful in these patients for a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis onset.

Is green tea a potential trigger for autoimmune hepatitis?

A case of autoimmune liver hepatitis is reported: the onset was triggered by consumption of green tea infusion in a patient taking oral contraceptives and irbesartan. We hypothesize that our patient, carrying genetic variant of hepatic metabolism making her particularly susceptible to oxidative stress, developed an abnormal response to a mild toxic insult, afforded by a combination of agents (oral contraceptives+irbesartan+green tea) that normally would not be able to cause damage. Her particular hepatic metabolism further increased the drugs' concentration, favoring the haptenization of liver proteins, eventually leading to the development of an autoimmune hepatitis.

Therapeutic landscape for ulcerative colitis: where is the Adacolumn(®) system and where should it be?

Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis is a relatively new therapy that has been proposed, sometimes with controversial results, for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, particularly ulcerative colitis. The aim of the present study was to perform a thorough review of the literature on the application of this type of treatment in ulcerative colitis and discuss the results, in order to provide an opinion on its use which is shared by the involved experts. The review of the literature was performed by searching PubMed with appropriate key words. The results obtained suggest that the major role for this treatment at this moment is for those patients with steroid dependency or with major contraindications to use of steroids. However, promising, albeit very preliminary, results have also been observed in steroid-naïve subjects, and this is of particular interest in consideration of the safety profile of this therapeutic method. As such, the Adacolumn may prove useful in specific subgroups of patients. Future phenotypic, genotypic, and molecular characterization of patients with inflammatory bowel disease might prove useful in defining better those subjects who might benefit most from this treatment modality.

PPARγ in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is member of a family of nuclear receptors that interacts with nuclear proteins acting as coactivators and corepressors. The colon is a major tissue which expresses PPARγ in epithelial cells and, to a lesser degree, in macrophages and lymphocytes and plays a role in the regulation of intestinal inflammation. Indeed, both natural and synthetic PPARγ ligands have beneficial effects in different models of experimental colitis, with possible implication in the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This paper will specifically focus on potential role of PPARγ in the predisposition and physiopathology of IBD and will analyze its possible role in medical therapy.