Experimental study on operative methods of pancreaticojejunostomy with reference to anastomotic patency and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function.

AIM: To assess the patency of pancreaticoenterostomy and pancreatic exocrine function after three surgical methods. METHODS: A pig model of pancreatic ductal dilation was made by ligating the main pancreatic duct. After 4 wk ligation, a total of 36 piglets were divided randomly into four groups. The piglets in the control group underwent laparotomy only; the others were treated by three anastomoses: (1) end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy invagination (EEPJ); (2) end-to-side duct-to-mucosa sutured anastomosis (ESPJ); or (3) binding pancreaticojejunostomy (BPJ). Anastomotic patency was assessed after 8 wk by body weight gain, intrapancreatic ductal pressure, pancreatic exocrine function secretin test, pancreatography, and macroscopic and histologic features of the anastomotic site. RESULTS: The EEPJ group had significantly slower weight gain than the ESPJ and BPJ groups on postoperative weeks 6 and 8 (P < 0.05). The animals in both the ESPJ and BPJ groups had a similar body weight gain. Intrapancreatic ductal pressure was similar in ESPJ and BPJ. However, pressure in EEPJ was significantly higher than that in ESPJ and BPJ (P < 0.05). All three functional parameters, the secretory volume, the flow rate of pancreatic juice, and bicarbonate concentration, were significantly higher in ESPJ and BPJ as compared to EEPJ (P < 0.05). However, the three parameters were similar in ESPJ and BPJ. Pancreatography performed after EEPJ revealed dilation and meandering of the main pancreatic duct, and the anastomotic site exhibited a variable degree of occlusion, and even blockage. Pancreatography of ESPJ and BPJ, however, showed normal ductal patency. Histopathology showed that the intestinal mucosa had fused with that of the pancreatic duct, with a gradual and continuous change from one to the other. For EEPJ, the portion of the pancreatic stump protruding into the jejunal lumen was largely replaced by cicatricial fibrous tissue. CONCLUSION: A mucosa-to-mucosa pancreatico-jejunostomy is the best choice for anastomotic patency when compared with EEPJ. BPJ can effectively maintain anastomotic patency and preserve pancreatic exocrine function as well as ESPJ.

[Radiofrequency ablation therapy combined with suture and ligation surgery for patients with giant cavernous hemangiomas of the liver].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy combined with suture and ligation surgery for patients with giant hepatic cavernous hemangioma (HCH). METHODS: Between June 2004 and June 2005, a total of 30 patients were treated by RFA therapy after suture and ligation surgery (SL group, n = 15, with 18 liver lesions) or RFA therapy without suture and ligation surgery (non-SL group, n = 15, with 17 liver lesions) under general anesthesia. All patients had obvious symptoms such as abdominal discomfort, pain and swelling. Preoperative diagnosis of HCH was established by means of ultrasonography, helical computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The mean maximum diameter of the lesions was 8.8 cm +/- 1.4 cm. All of the 35 lesions were located on the liver surface, in the caudate lobe of the liver, or adjacent to the gallbladder. Seven patients had chronic calculous cholecystitis, 6 common duct stones, 5 thrombocytopenias, and one posthepatitic cirrhosis. Thirteen of the 30 patients had previous laparotomy. Therapeutic efficacy and clinical data of RFA therapy were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: RFA therapy under ultrasound guidance was performed successfully in all the patients. Cholecystectomy was performed simultaneously for gallstones in 7 patients and for abutting of gallbladder from hemangioma in 2 patients. Choledochotomy with T-tube drainage was performed in 6 patients. The mean blood loss, the mean RFA time per lesion and reduction rate of maximum diameter of the lesions 6 months after RFA in the SL group and non-SL group were 88.0 ml +/- 22.4 ml vs. 255.0 ml +/- 71.7 ml (P < 0.001), 23.0 min +/- 7.5 min vs. 53.3 min +/- 16.0 min (P < 0.001), and 61.8% vs. 44.8% (P < 0.001) respectively. No severe complication related to RFA was observed in all patients. At a median follow-up of 12 months (6 approximately 17 months), a complete lesion necrosis was achieved on the contrast-enhanced helical CT scans in both groups. During the follow-up, all of the 15 patients were free of upper abdominal pain in the SL group, and 12 patients were symptom-free and 3 obtained significant amelioration of symptoms in the non-SL group. CONCLUSION: RFA therapy combined with suture and ligation surgery is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment modality for patients with giant HCHs. It can reduce blood loss, shorten RFA therapy time, and increase therapeutic efficacy of RFA. Intraoperative ultrasonography is a useful adjunct for increasing the therapeutic efficacy of RFA and reducing the complications related to RFA.

[Clinical evaluation of radiofrequency ablation therapy in patients with hepatic cavernous hemangiomas].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy in patients with hepatic cavernous hemangioma (HCH) and investigate its optimal operative approach. METHODS: Between March 2001 and June 2004, a total of 68 patients, 18 males and 50 females, age 43.1 (30-64), with 104 HCHs 2.5-11 cm in diameter with the mean size of 5.6 cm, were treated by ultrasound-guided RFA, via percutaneous (n = 19), laparoscopic (n = 29), or open surgical (n = 20) approach. In 7 patients with hepatic lesions larger than 7 cm in diameter, Pringle maneuver was used to occlude the hepatic blood flow during the laparoscopic and open RFA therapy. All patients were followed up with helical computed tomographic (CT) scans and ultrasonography for 19 months (6-36 months). RESULTS: Additional intrahepatic lesions not detected preoperatively were found in 2 patients (with 2 new lesions) via laparoscopy and 3 patients (with 4 new lesions) via celiotomy. All patients were treated with RFA successfully. The mean blood loss in the Pringle group (90.0 ml +/- 22.4 ml) was significantly fewer than that in the non-Pringle group (249 ml +/- 56 ml) (P < 0.01). The mean RFA time per lesion in the Pringle group (29.0 min +/- 7.5 min) was shorter markedly compared to the non-Pringle group (55.4 min +/- 12.4 min) (P < 0.01). In the laparoscopic RFA group, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed simultaneously in 15 patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis and in another 2 patients because of tumors abutting the gallbladders, and laparoscopic fenestration with intraperitoneal drainage was performed in 3 patients with simple hepatic cysts. In the open RFA group, cholecystectomy was performed in 5 patients with gallbladder diseases, partial cystectomy was performed in one patient with a hepatic cyst, and choledochotomy was performed in 3 patients with common bile duct stones. Postoperative fever and abnormal serum transaminase (ALT and AST) levels were observed in 29 patients (42.6%). A transient hematuria occurred in one patient after open RFA. No specific complications developed during or after RFA. The follow-up showed a complete lesion necrosis rate of 99% (103/104). One patient showed an incomplete lesion necrosis in the margin of RFA site 6 months after percutaneous RFA therapy and obtained retreatment with percutaneous RFA. CONCLUSION: RFA therapy is a safe, feasible and effective treatment options for patients with HCHs. This procedure can be performed via percutaneous, laparoscopic, or open approach. To prevent the RFA-related complications and to increase the therapeutic efficacy of RFA, the choice of optimal operative approach should be based on the lesion size, number, and location and on the patient's clinical status. Hepatic inflow occlusion by Pringle maneuver during laparoscopic or open RFA therapy can reduce the blood loss and increase the therapeutic efficacy significantly.

[Preliminary experimental study on treatment of portal hypertension with auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) on portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis with amelioration of portal vein congestion, changes in portal vein pressure and status of the graft. METHODS: The recipients were porcine model of biliary cirrhosis reproduced by ligation of the common bile duct. During transplantation, arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure were recorded. Buffer base, standard bicarbonate and pH of arterial blood samples were determined and analyzed in order to assess the impact of operation on the animals. The hemodynamics were also monitored. Color Doppler ultrasonographic examination was performed on recipients before operation, intra-operation and 7 days after operation, respectively. Portal vein pressure, blood bilirubin and variables of liver function were measured by using an autoanalyzer. Wedge biopsy specimens of each pig were obtained, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and examined. Analysis of variance was performed. Otherwise non-parametric tests were used. RESULTS: Eight weeks after ligation of the common bile duct, biliary cirrhosis was reproduced in all the pigs, and histopathological examination of the liver specimen showed a large number of pseudo-lobules. In 6 pigs with hepatic cirrhosis liver transplantation was done. Five of the 6 (83.3%) animals survived for 7 days. One recipient died because of unsuccessful operation, the others showed stable hemodynamics during the operation. Seven days after transplantation, the blood flow of the two liver portal veins was observed by the use of color Doppler ultrasonography. It was found that the blood flow in the donor portal vein was much richer than that of native portal vein. The venous outflow of the graft was ample and smooth, and no thrombosis of the hepatic vein or portal vein was found. The variables, including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin and total bilirubin, were significantly improved 7 days after operation compared with pre-operative data. Portal pressure was found to be (20.76+/-2.42)cm H(2)O(1 cm H(2)O=0.098 kPa), (17.62+/-2.33)cm H(2)O and (14.72+/-2.25)cm H(2)O before the operation, during the operation, and 7 days after operation, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01). On the 7 days after transplantation, histopathological examination revealed evidence of damage with mild steatosis and sporadic necrotic hepatocytes and focal hepatic lobular degeneration in the graft, especially in the area around the central vein. CONCLUSION: APOLT is a hopeful option for the treatment of portal hypertension. This procedure can provide not only some improvement of the liver function but also decrease the pressure of portal vein.

[Wound healing after pancreaticojejunostomy in piglets: a comparison between two anastomotic methods].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate wound healing after types of pancreaticojejunostomy. METHODS: After resection of the pancreatic head, 38 domestic piglets were divided into two groups according to the types of anastomoses: group I: binding pancreaticojejunostomy, a new technique designed and advocated by professor Peng Shuyou; group II: end-to-end pancreaticojejunal invagination. Anastomotic strength in vivo and histopathological findings were assessed on operative day and postoperative day 5 and 10. RESULTS: Bursting pressure was 139.7 +/- 8.0, 178.7 +/- 9.7 and 268.8 +/- 12.8 mm Hg in group I on day 0, 5 and 10, whereas 67.3 +/- 7.9, 96.2 +/- 10.4 and 130.6 +/- 9.3 mm Hg in group II. The gain on day 0 to 5 and 5 to 10 was 27.9% and 50.5% in group I and 42.9% and 35.7% in group II, respectively. A significant difference was observed between group I and group II, and between 5 and 10 day after anastomoses (P < 0.01). Breaking strength was 4.5 +/- 0.4, 6.6 +/- 0.4 and 10.0 +/- 0.6 N in group I on day 0, 5 and 10 and 4.6 +/- 0.6, 5.8 +/- 0.5 and 7.1 +/- 0.6 N in group II. Although a similar value was shown in both types of anastomoses on day 0, a rapider gain was demonstrated on day 0 to 5 and 5 to 10 in group I (44.8% and 52.9%) than in group II (25.4% and 22.0%). A significant difference was found on day 5 and 10 between the two types of anastomoses (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). Anastomotic site was well repaired by connective tissue and the cut surface of pancreatic stump was covered by mucosal epithelium in group I on day 10, but the cut surface was incompletely repaired by granulation tissue and no, regeneration of the epithelium was found in group II. CONCLUSION: Anastomotic strength of binding pancreaticojejunostomy was stronger than end-to-end pancreaticojejunal invagination and the healing was better and rapid.