Point-of-care ultrasound with handheld devices in hematology: a monocentric single-stage phase II study.

Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) with pocket-size devices is an efficient and safe imaging modality that became a standard of care in various clinical settings. However, its implementation in hematology has never been evaluated so far. We conducted a prospective monocentric study aiming to harvest data on its usage and to assess its diagnostic and interventional performance in improving the accuracy of basic physical examination in hematological patients. After a focused training program, six hematologists were trained and conducted this study. Sixty-two patients were included. Only in 19 cases, further specialized imaging was required, whereas, in 43 patients PoCUS was sufficient to address the clinical inquiries. The use of PoCUS devices was assessed for its performance difficulty and usefulness perception with satisfactory outcomes. This study represents a proof-of-concept application of PoCUS in hematology, suggesting benefits over the physical examination.KEY POINTSPoCUS is particularly attractive in a hematological setting because able to improve the accuracy of physical examination.A hematology-focused training in PoCUS using handheld devices can allow hematologists to perform bed-side diagnostic and interventional US-based exams.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in France: a retrospective analysis of a national insurance claims database.

BACKGROUND: Data estimating the annual incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in France, taking into account both hospital and community settings, are very lacking. This study aimed to estimate the annual incidence of VTE (pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)) in France in 2011 in "real world" population. METHODS: This was a longitudinal insurance claims study of the incidence of VTE in France over 2 years (2010 and 2011). The data analysis was performed using the EGB (Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires) database, a randomly selected sample of the French national insurance database (CNAMTS) which covers 77 % of the population. All adult patients experiencing a VTE event during the study period were analysed. Recurrence rate of VTE and all-cause mortality rate were also estimated over a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: The estimated annual incidence of VTE in France was 184.0 per 100 000 subjects, corresponding to a total of 119 670 events countrywide. The estimated incidence of DVT and PE were respectively 119.8 and 64.2 per 100 000 subjects. Annual recurrence of VTE was reported in 5.5 % (n = 99) patients, with a significantly higher recurrence rate in patients with PE than those with DVT (p = 0.02). Overall, 6.2 % (n = 112) of patients had died over the 12-month follow-up (respectively 10.2 and 7.7 % of patients with DVT and PE). DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this analysis is the first to estimate the annual incidence of VTE in France using exhaustive data from the EGB database. This has allowed the incidence of DVT in the community to be documented, which to date has not been characterised. Previous studies in France have been limited to the hospital setting and have yielded incidence rates comparable to ours. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis is the first to estimate the annual incidence of VTE in France using exhaustive data from the EGB database. This study showed that the incidence and the burden of the disease remains elevated.

Cause of death in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to French hospitals in 2012: a nationwide database study.

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have risk factors and coexisting conditions that increase their mortality risk. We performed a cause-of-death analysis to identify predictors of mortality in hospitalised patients with AF in France. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, population-based cross-sectional study, the Programme de médicalisation des systèmes d'information was used to identify 533 044 adults with a diagnosis of AF or atrial flutter hospitalised for any reason in France from January through December 2012. Stepwise multivariable analyses were performed to identify determinants of mortality. The mean age was 78.0±11.4 years, 47.1% were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.0±1.8. During hospitalisation, 9.4% (n=50 165) of the patients died, 34% due to a cardiovascular event, most often heart failure (16.6%), stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism (9.8%) or vascular or ischaemic disease (4.0%). The strongest predictors of overall death were age ≥75 years (OR 2.57, 95% CI 2.47 to 2.68), renal failure (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.81 to 1.89), cancer (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.78 to 1.85) and lung disease (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.55 to 1.62). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular events were the most common cause of death, occurring in one-third of patients, in this comprehensive study of hospitalised patients with AF. Despite the high risk of stroke in this population, only 10% died from stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism. The strongest predictors of overall death were non-cardiovascular. Physicians should be encouraged to focus on preventable serious and disabling cardiovascular events (such as stroke) as well as on potentially fatal non-cardiovascular comorbidities.

Evaluation of a mobile electronic assistant to aid in fluindione prescription: the INRPlus cluster randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) is crucial for dose adjustment of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to maximize time in therapeutic range (TTR). We compared the use of a mobile electronic assistant INRPlus which proposes patient-specific fluindione doses, to standard fluindione management in a cluster randomized controlled study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty clusters of six general practitioners were randomized to adjust fluindione doses in VKA-treated patients either using INRPlus or according to routine practice. TTR was measured over 6 months, along with time spent above or below the recommended INR range, frequency of measurements and related complications. RESULTS: Of the 595 included patients, 551 were assessable (259 INRPlus, 292 control) and had a mean of 1.6 INR measurements/month. TTR was not significantly different between the two groups, 72.7% [Q1: 58.1%; Q3: 90%] in INRPlus patients and 71.2% [Q1: 54.8%; Q3: 88.2%] in control patients (p=0.445). At least 60% time within reference ranges was reported in 73.4% of INRPlus patients and 67.1% of control patients (relative risk 1.09, 95%CI 0.98-1.22, p=0.115). No significant differences were reported between the two groups for time outside reference ranges, frequency of measurements or complications. Eighty-two percent (82%) of patients complying with INRPlus-proposed doses spent more than 60% of TTR versus 66.9% of non-compliant patients and 67.1% of reference patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, the use of the INRPlus electronic assistant resulted in a non-significant improvement in TTR that may be due to a higher than expected TTR in the control group.