Accuracy of Financial Disclosures in Radiology Journals.

PURPOSE: The accuracy and completeness of self-disclosures of the value of industry payments by authors publishing in radiology journals are not well known. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of financial disclosures by US authors in five prominent radiology journals. METHODS: Financial disclosures provided by US-based authors in five prominent radiology journals from original research and review articles published in 2021 were reviewed. For each author, payment reports were extracted from the Open Payments Database (OPD) in the previous 36 months related to general, research, and ownership payments. Each author was analyzed individually to determine if the reported disclosures matched results from the OPD. RESULTS: A total of 4,076 authorships, including 3,406 unique authors, were selected from 643 articles across the five journals; 1,388 (1,032 unique authors) received industry payments within the previous 36 months, with a median total amount received per authorship of $6,650 (interquartile range, $355-$87,725). Sixty-one authors (4.4%) disclosed all industry relationships, 205 (14.8%) disclosed some of the OPD-reported relationships, and 1,122 (80.8%) failed to disclose any relationships. Undisclosed payments totaled $186,578,350, representing 67.2% of all payments. Radiology had the highest proportion of authorships disclosing some or all OPD-reported relationships (32.3%), compared with the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (18.2%), the American Journal of Neuroradiology (17.3%), JACR (13.1%), and the American Journal of Roentgenology (10.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Financial relationships with industry are common among US physician authors in prominent radiology journals, and nondisclosure rates are high.

Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Physician Authors of ACR Appropriateness Criteria.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy and completeness of self-disclosures by authors of imaging guidelines are not well known. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of financial disclosures by US authors of ACR appropriateness criteria. METHODS: We reviewed financial disclosures provided by US-based authors of all ACR-AC published in 2019, 2021 and 2023. For each US- based author, payment reports were extracted from the Open Payments Database (OPD) in the previous 36 months related to general category and research payments categories. We analyzed each author individually to determine if the reported disclosures matched results from OPD. RESULTS: A total of 633 authorships, including 333 unique authors were included from 38 ACR AC articles in 2019, with 606 authorships (387 unique authors) from 35 ACR-AC articles published in 2021, and 540 authorships (367 unique authors) from 32 ACR AC articles published in 2023. Among authors who received industry payments, failure to disclose any financial relationship was seen in 125/147 unique authors in 2019, 142/148 authors in 2021 and 95/125 unique authors in 2023. The proportion of nondisclosed total value of payments was 86.1% in 2019, 88.6% in 2021 and 56.7% in 2023. General category payments were nondisclosed in 94.1% in 2019, 89.7% in 2021 and 94.4% in 2023 by payment value. CONCLUSION: Industry payments to authors of radiology guidelines are common and frequently undisclosed.

Intracardiac Thrombus in COVID-19 Inpatients: A Nationwide Study of Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes.

COronaVIrus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. Intracardiac thrombosis is a potentially serious complication but has seldom been evaluated in COVID-19 patients. We assessed the incidence, associated factors, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with intracardiac thrombosis. In 2020, COVID-19 inpatients were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Data on clinical characteristics, intracardiac thrombosis, and adverse outcomes were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with intracardiac thrombosis, in-hospital mortality, and morbidities. In 2020, 1,683,785 COVID-19 inpatients (mean age 63.8 years, 32.2% females) were studied. Intracardiac thrombosis occurred in 0.10% (1830) of cases. In-hospital outcomes included 13.2% all-cause mortality, 3.5% cardiovascular mortality, 2.6% cardiac arrest, 4.4% acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 16.1% heart failure, 1.3% stroke, and 28.3% acute kidney injury (AKI). Key factors for intracardiac thrombosis were congestive heart failure history and coagulopathy. Intracardiac thrombosis independently linked to higher risks of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 3.32 (2.42-4.54)), cardiovascular mortality (OR: 2.95 (1.96-4.44)), cardiac arrest (OR: 2.04 (1.22-3.43)), ACS (OR: 1.62 (1.17-2.22)), stroke (OR: 3.10 (2.11-4.56)), and AKI (OR: 2.13 (1.68-2.69)), but not heart failure. While rare, intracardiac thrombosis in COVID-19 patients independently raised in-hospital mortality and morbidity risks.

Analysis of Medical Malpractice Claims Involving Interventional Radiologists: A Comprehensive Analysis From Two National Legal Databases.

PURPOSE: The nature of lawsuits involving interventional radiologists (IRs) is not well understood. The purposes of this article are to provide an overview of the causes of action underlying medical malpractice lawsuits related to IRs and to characterize the associated factors and outcomes. METHODS: Two large legal databases were used to search for US legal cases in which there were jury awards and settlements involving IRs in the United States. Cases were screened to include only those cases in which the cause of action involved negligence on the part of IRs. RESULTS: A total of 389 published case summaries were identified, of which 93 were eligible to be included in the analysis. In 46% of the cases (43 of 93), medical malpractice was alleged against an individual IR, whereas in 43% (40 of 93), it was alleged against both an individual IR and a health care institution. Thirty-five percent of IR malpractice cases (33 of 93) involved the performance of a vascular procedure, most commonly embolization procedures (30% [n = 10]), stenting or angioplasty (21% [n = 7]), and diagnostic arteriography and angiography (18% [n = 6]). Twenty-six percent of cases (24 of 93) involved IR performance of a biopsy. Eighteen percent of cases (17 of 93) involved a failure to gain informed consent in addition to an allegation of medical negligence during treatment. Eleven percent of cases (10 of 93) were resolved by settlement, with an average settlement amount of $877,500 (range, $200,000-$2,700,000). Among the 72 cases that went to trial, 74% (53 of 72) resulted in judgments for the defendants, and 26% (19 of 72) resulted in judgements for the plaintiffs, with an average award of $2,012,243 (range, $101,667-$6,400,000). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular procedures and biopsies were the most frequent reasons for malpractice lawsuits involving IRs. Failure to gain informed consent in addition to an allegation of medical negligence during treatment was not infrequent. Although the majority of published medical malpractice claims involving IRs resulted in judgments in favor of the defendants, the average amount awarded to plaintiffs was higher compared with previous data reported for all physicians.

Potential Applications and Impact of ChatGPT in Radiology.

Radiology has always gone hand-in-hand with technology and artificial intelligence (AI) is not new to the field. While various AI devices and algorithms have already been integrated in the daily clinical practice of radiology, with applications ranging from scheduling patient appointments to detecting and diagnosing certain clinical conditions on imaging, the use of natural language processing and large language model based software have been in discussion for a long time. Algorithms like ChatGPT can help in improving patient outcomes, increasing the efficiency of radiology interpretation, and aiding in the overall workflow of radiologists and here we discuss some of its potential applications.

3D isotropic MRI of ankle: review of literature with comparison to 2D MRI.

The ankle joint has complex anatomy with different tissue structures and is commonly involved in traumatic injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary imaging modality used to assess the soft tissue structures around the ankle joint including the ligaments, tendons, and articular cartilage. Two-dimensional (2D) fast spin echo/turbo spin echo (FSE/TSE) sequences are routinely used for ankle joint imaging. While the 2D sequences provide a good signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) with high spatial resolution, there are some limitations to their use owing to the thick slices, interslice gaps leading to partial volume effects, limited fluid contrast, and the need to acquire separate images in different orthogonal planes. The 3D MR imaging can overcome these limitations and recent advances have led to technical improvements that enable its widespread clinical use in acceptable time periods. The volume imaging renders the advantage of reconstructing into thin continuous slices with isotropic voxels enabling multiplanar reconstructions that helps in visualizing complex anatomy of the structure of interest throughout their course with improved sharpness, definition of anatomic variants, and fluid conspicuity of lesions and injuries. Recent advances have also reduced the acquisition time of the 3D datasets making it more efficient than 2D sequences. This article reviews the recent technical developments in the domain 3D MRI, compares imaging with 3D versus 2D sequences, and demonstrates the use-case scenarios with interesting cases, and benefits of 3D MRI in evaluating various ankle joint components and their lesions.

Diversity in Radiology Residents Relative to Other Specialties- Trends Over the Past Decade.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess diversity among radiology residents relative to other specialties and compare it with historical trends. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Graduate Medical Education results from 2010-2011 to 2020-2021 were accessed for demographic information for major medical specialties (number of residents > 500 as of the 2020-2021 report). Subspecialties and fellowship programs were not included in this analysis. The racial and ethnicity breakdowns were extracted, including Black, White/Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic, and others. The changes in racial and ethnicity composition of residents in radiology was compared to other specialties using the Chi Squared test using a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: In 2020-2021, radiology ranked ninth in total resident enrollment among the 21 largest ACGME training programs, unchanged when compared to 2010-2011. Amongst all specialties, Radiology ranked 10th for Black and 9th for Hispanic representation in 2020-2021.The percentage of Black residents increased from 3.07% in 2010-2011 to 3.83% in 2020-2021. The percentage of Hispanic Radiology residents increased from 4.83% to 7.35%, constituting the third largest increase amongst all specialties. CONCLUSION: The representation of Blacks and Hispanics in Radiology has improved relative to other medical specialties in the last decade.

Contrast Agent Administration as a Source of Liability: A Legal Database Analysis.

Background Radiology ranks high in terms of specialties implicated in medical malpractice claims. While most radiologists understand the risks of liability for missed findings or lapses of communication, liability for the use of contrast agents in imaging procedures may be underappreciated. Purpose To review the clinical context and outcomes of lawsuits alleging medical malpractice for contrast-related imaging procedures. Materials and Methods Two large U.S. legal databases were queried using the terms "Contrast" and "Radiology OR Radiologist" from database inception to October 31, 2022, to identify cases with published decisions or settlements related to medical malpractice in patients who underwent contrast-related imaging procedures. The search results were screened to include only those cases involving the practice area of health care law where there was at least one claim of medical negligence against a health care institution or provider. Data on the medical complications alleged by patients after contrast agent administration and on the trial were extracted and reported using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 151 published case summaries were included in the analysis. Anaphylactic reaction following contrast agent administration was the most common medical complication observed (30% [45 of 151 cases]), of which failure to diagnose developing anaphylaxis or failure to treat the anaphylactic reaction made up the majority of allegations (93% [42 of 45]). Inappropriate management of contrast media extravasation (27% [41 of 151]) and alleged contrast agent-induced acute kidney injury (13% [19 of 151]) were the next most frequent causes of lawsuits. Of the 11 cases of alleged kidney injury that went to trial, all resulted in a judgment in favor of the defense. Conclusion This study highlights the key reasons for medical malpractice lawsuits associated with use of contrast media and outcomes from these lawsuits. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Trop in this issue.

Von Hippel-Lindau Disease (VHL): Characteristic Lesions with Classic Imaging Findings.

Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is a multisystem cancer syndrome caused by the inactivation of the VHL tumor suppressor gene and involves various organ systems including the central nervous system (CNS), endocrine system, and the kidneys. Tumors seen in patients with VHL disease can be benign or malignant and are usually multifocal, bilateral, and hypervascular in nature. As most lesions associated with VHL are asymptomatic initially, early diagnosis and the institution of an evidence-based surveillance protocol are of paramount importance. Screening, surveillance, and genetic counseling are key aspects in the management of patients diagnosed with VHL disease and often require a multidisciplinary approach and referral to specialized centers. This article will discuss the characteristic lesions seen with VHL disease, their diagnosis, screening protocols and management strategies, as well as an illustrative case to demonstrate the natural progression of the disease with classic imaging findings.

Value Proposition of FDA-Approved Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Neuroimaging.

PURPOSE: The number of FDA-cleared artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for neuroimaging has grown in the past decade. The adoption of these algorithms into clinical practice depends largely on whether this technology provides value in the clinical setting. The objective of this study was to analyze trends in FDA-cleared AI algorithms for neuroimaging and understand their value proposition as advertised by the AI developers and vendors. METHODS: A list of AI algorithms cleared by the FDA for neuroimaging between May 2008 and August 2022 was extracted from the ACR Data Science Institute AI Central database. Product information for each device was collected from the database. For each device, information on the advertised value as presented on the developer's website was collected. RESULTS: A total of 59 AI neuroimaging algorithms were cleared by the FDA between May 2008 and August 2022. Most of these algorithms (24 of 59) were compatible with noncontrast CT, 21 with MRI, 9 with CT perfusion, 8 with CT angiography, 3 with MR perfusion, and 2 with PET. Six algorithms were compatible with multiple imaging techniques. Of the 59 algorithms, websites were located that discussed the product value for 55 algorithms. The most widely advertised value proposition was improved quality of care (38 of 55 [69.1%]). A total of 24 algorithms (43.6%) proposed saving user time, 9 (15.7%) advertised decreased costs, and 6 (10.9%) described increased revenue. Product websites for 26 algorithms (43.6%) showed user testimonials advertising the value of the technology. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate a wide range of value propositions advertised by developers and vendors of AI algorithms for neuroimaging. Most vendors advertised that their products would improve patient care. Further research is necessary to determine whether the value claimed by developers is actually demonstrated in clinical practice.

American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: a bibliometric analysis of panel members.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the features of panel members involved in the writing of the ACR-AC and identify alignment with research output and topic-specific research publications. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on the research output of panel members of 34 ACR-AC documents published in 2021. For each author, we searched Medline to record total number of papers (P), total number of ACR-AC papers (C) and total number of previously published papers that are relevant to the ACR-AC topic (R). RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-three different panel members constituted 602 panel positions for creating 34 ACR-AC in 2021 with a median panel size of 17 members. Sixty-eight (17.5%) of experts had been part of ≥10 previously published ACR-AC papers and 154 (40%) were members in ≥ 5 published ACR-AC papers. The median number of previously published papers relevant to the ACR-AC topic was 1 (IQR: 0-5). 44% of the panel members had no previously published paper relevant to the ACR-AC topic. The proportion of ACR-AC papers (C/P) was higher for authors with ≥ 5 ACR-AC papers (0.21) than authors with < 5 ACR-AC papers (0.11, p < 0.0001); however, proportion of relevant papers per topic (R/P) was higher for authors with < 5 ACR-AC papers (0.10) than authors with ≥ 5 ACR-AC papers (0.07). CONCLUSION: The composition of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria panels reflects many members with little or no previously published literature on the topic of consideration. Similar pool of experts exists on multiple expert panels formulating imaging appropriateness guidelines. KEY POINTS: There were 68 (17.5%) panel experts on ≥ 10 ACR-AC panels. Nearly 45% of the panel experts had zero median number of relevant papers. Fifteen panels (44%) had > 50% of members having zero relevant papers.

Diversity in Radiology: Current Status and Trends Over the Past Decade.

Background There have been growing efforts nationally and institutionally toward diversity in radiology. Purpose To analyze sex and racial and ethnic diversity over time (2010-2019) for the various levels of the U.S. academic radiology physician workforce in context of the available pipeline of medical students and trainees. Materials and Methods Data on sex and race and ethnicity were collected among medical school applicants, graduates, radiology residency applicants, residents, and different levels of academic radiology faculty. All trainee data were obtained from two time points, 2010-2011 and 2019-2020. Radiology faculty data were collected from 2010 to 2019. The sex and racial and ethnic composition at each academic level was compared between 2010 and 2019 using the χ2 test and a significance level of P < .05. Results In 2019, the percentage of female faculty among radiology instructors was 38% (251 of 655); assistant professors, 31% (1503 of 4801); associate professors, 28% (600 of 2161); professors, 22% (424 of 1901); and department chairs, 17% (37 of 220). The proportion of female faculty increased from 2010 to 2019, with the greatest relative increase in percentages among the more senior faculty positions. However, the proportion of female department chairs has only increased from 13% (27 of 203) in 2010 to 17% (37 of 220) in 2019. Across training levels, the most abrupt change in composition of female trainees occurred from medical school matriculates (52%, 11 160 of 21 614) to radiology residency applicants (29%, 656 of 2274), which largely stayed unchanged from 2010 to 2019. The proportion of Black or African American department chairs was 5% (10 of 220) in 2019, which was higher compared with that of assistant professor, associate professor, and professor levels for Black or African American faculty (3% [130 of 4949], 2% [41 of 2208], and 2% [35 of 1924], respectively), with proportions of Hispanic faculty at 5% (240 of 4949), 4% (96 of 2208), and 3% (60 of 1924), respectively. These proportions have not changed since 2010. Conclusion Identifying and addressing reasons for the low proportion of female radiology residency applicants despite a highly diverse pool of medical students would be key to increasing female representation in the field. The low representation of African American and Hispanic individuals in academic radiology is seen at all levels and has not changed much over time. Efforts to increase diversity may need to be focused toward the medical school and residency application levels. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Pandharipande and Shah in this issue.

Uvular Necrosis: A Rare Complication After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in an Intubated Patient.

Uvular necrosis is a potential etiology of postesophagogastroduodenoscopy persistent sore throat and odynophagia, and physicians should be alert to the possibility of this potential complication. Diagnosis is clinical and can be made on the basis of symptoms and characteristic findings on oropharyngeal examination. It has a benign course with an overall good clinical outcome. Conservative symptomatic management is the treatment of choice, and full recovery can be expected in 2 weeks. Keeping oropharyngeal instruments and ventilation tubes to the side of the midline, avoidance of blind suctioning, and decreasing the power of suction devices are some of the measures, which might reduce the risk of intraprocedure uvular injury. In addition, it is important to note that the risk of injury is higher in some individuals, for instance, patients with a long uvula, and it might be beneficial to take extra precautions in these patients.

Adult Wilms tumor: An unusual case report with dedicated literature review.

Wilms tumor is the most common primary renal malignancy in pediatric age group, however, is rare in adults accounting for 0.5% of all adult renal malignancies. The histopathology is similar in both age groups, however the prognosis in adults is poor with tumor being at advanced stage at presentation with increased incidence of metastasis. Due to rare occurrence in adults and lack of differentiating clinical and imaging features its diagnosis is delayed or often misdiagnosed as adult renal cell cancer. Pre surgical or early post-surgical chemotherapy has shown significantly better surgical outcome and survival rate, however, delayed or misdiagnosis precludes or delays the chemotherapy. Lack of standardized treatment guidelines for adults also adds to the poor prognosis. Presurgical biopsy of renal masses in young adults can be suggested for early diagnosis as well as inclusion of presurgical chemotherapy for overall better outcome.

A pictorial review of ultrasonography of the FIGO classification for uterine leiomyomas.

Uterine leiomyomas are the most common gynecological and pelvic neoplasm, reported in up to 80 percent of women by age 50. While the majority are asymptomatic, uterine leiomyomas, depending on size, number, and location can result in bulk symptoms, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Ultrasonography (USG) remains first-line for the diagnosis of leiomyomas and is the most appropriate imaging modality for the initial assessment of abnormal uterine bleeding. In an effort to standardize nomenclature and identify causes of AUB, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) developed a classification system based on the acronym PALM-COEIN (polyp; adenomyosis; leiomyoma; malignancy and hyperplasia; coagulopathy; ovulatory dysfunction; endometrial; iatrogenic; and not yet classified). For the L category of leiomyoma, when present, a secondary and tertiary subclassification system is described distinguishing submucosal masses from others and categorizing the relationship of the mass to the endometrium and serosa. With advancements in newer minimally to non-invasive techniques developed for the management of leiomyomas, uniform characterization, mapping, and classification of leiomyomas is necessary to decide the optimal therapeutic approach. While this classification system has recently been reviewed on MR, to our knowledge, it has not been reviewed on ultrasound in the radiology literature. We hereby present a pictorial review of USG images of all the FIGO categories of leiomyomas to provide a standard guide for radiology reporting.

Umbralisib-Induced Immune-Mediated Colitis: A Concerning Adverse Effect of the Novel PI3Kδ/CK1ε Inhibitor.

Novel chemotherapeutic agents are developed to treat recurrent/relapsed lymphoid malignancies. Umbralisib, a novel phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor with a selective isoform binding, has shown an improved efficacy and safety profile in clinical trials. Immune-mediated colitis, a frequently observed dose-limiting adverse event of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, has been mostly observed at supratherapeutic doses in the trials, with grade 1 or 2 diarrhea being the most common adverse event at the therapeutic dose (800 mg PO QD). We present a grade-3 colitis that can be attributed to umbralisib-mediated immune toxicity in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia at the therapeutic dose.