Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
1.
Eur Psychiatry ; 67(1): e24, 2024 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Considering the recently growing number of potentially traumatic events in Europe, the European Psychiatric Association undertook a study to investigate clinicians' treatment choices for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: The case-based analysis included 611 participants, who correctly classified the vignette as a case of PTSD, from Central/ Eastern Europe (CEE) (n = 279), Southern Europe (SE) (n = 92), Northern Europe (NE) (n = 92), and Western Europe (WE) (N = 148). RESULTS: About 82% woulduse antidepressants (sertraline being the most preferred one). Benzodiazepines and antipsychotics were significantly more frequently recommended by participants from CEE (33 and 4%, respectively), compared to participants from NE (11 and 0%) and SE (9% and 3%). About 52% of clinicians recommended trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy and 35% psychoeducation, irrespective of their origin. In the latent class analysis, we identified four distinct "profiles" of clinicians. In Class 1 (N = 367), psychiatrists would less often recommend any antidepressants. In Class 2 (N = 51), clinicians would recommend trazodone and prolonged exposure therapy. In Class 3 (N = 65), they propose mirtazapine and eye movement desensitization reprocessing therapy. In Class 4 (N = 128), clinicians propose different types of medications and cognitive processing therapy. About 50.1% of participants in each region stated they do not adhere to recognized treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians' decisions for PTSD are broadly similar among European psychiatrists, but regional differences suggest the need for more dialogue and education to harmonize practice across Europe and promote the use of guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Psiquiatras , Europa (Continente) , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico
2.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 94(4): 1417-1430, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37424466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High heterogeneity exists in estimates of the share of and absolute costs of informal care (IC) for individuals diagnosed with dementia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences in the share of and absolute costs of IC between subpopulations defined by latent profiles of activities of daily living (ADLs), neuropsychiatric symptoms, and global cognitive functioning. METHODS: We performed a nested cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 2019-2021 at the Zagreb-Zapad Health Center, Zagreb, Croatia, from a sample of patients and their caregivers. The outcome was the share of costs of IC in the total costs of care estimated using the Resource Utilization in Dementia questionnaire. We used latent profile analysis of six principal components of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study ADLs inventory, Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Mini-Mental State Examination, and conducted the analysis using beta and quantile regression. RESULTS: We enrolled 240 patients with a median age of 74 years; 78% were women. The annual cost for treatment and care for one patient was 11,462 (95% confidence interval 9,947; 12,976) EUR. After the adjustment for covariates, five latent profiles were significantly associated with the share of costs and absolute cost of IC. The adjusted annual costs of IC ranged from 2,157 EUR, with a share of 53% in the first latent profile, to 18,119 EUR, with a share of 78% in the fifth latent profile. CONCLUSION: The population of patients with dementia was heterogeneous, and there were relatively large differences in the share and absolute costs of IC between particular subpopulations.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Croacia/epidemiología , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Cuidadores , Atención al Paciente , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Costo de Enfermedad
3.
Eur Psychiatry ; 65(1): e75, 2022 10 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36266742

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While shared clinical decision-making (SDM) is the preferred approach to decision-making in mental health care, its implementation in everyday clinical practice is still insufficient. The European Psychiatric Association undertook a study aiming to gather data on the clinical decision-making style preferences of psychiatrists working in Europe. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey involving a sample of 751 psychiatrists and psychiatry specialist trainees from 38 European countries in 2021, using the Clinical Decision-Making Style - Staff questionnaire and a set of questions regarding clinicians' expertise, training, and practice. RESULTS: SDM was the preferred decision-making style across all European regions ([central and eastern Europe, CEE], northern and western Europe [NWE], and southern Europe [SE]), with an average of 73% of clinical decisions being rated as SDM. However, we found significant differences in non-SDM decision-making styles: participants working in NWE countries more often prefer shared and active decision-making styles rather than passive styles when compared to other European regions, especially to the CEE. Additionally, psychiatry specialist trainees (compared to psychiatrists), those working mainly with outpatients (compared to those working mainly with inpatients) and those working in community mental health services/public services (compared to mixed and private settings) have a significantly lower preference for passive decision-making style. CONCLUSIONS: The preferences for SDM styles among European psychiatrists are generally similar. However, the identified differences in the preferences for non-SDM styles across the regions call for more dialogue and educational efforts to harmonize practice across Europe.


Asunto(s)
Participación del Paciente , Psiquiatría , Humanos , Toma de Decisiones , Estudios Transversales , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 962048, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35967553

RESUMEN

Background: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the main cause of end-stage renal disease in patients with diabetes mellitus type I (DM-T1). Microalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are standard predictors of DKD. However, these predictors have serious weaknesses. Our study aimed to analyze cystatin C, renal resistance index, and urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) as predictors of DKD. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2019 on a consecutive sample of children and adolescents (10-18 years) diagnosed with DM-T1. The outcome was a risk for DKD estimated using standard predictors: age, urinary albumin, eGFR, serum creatinine, DM-T1 duration, HbA1c, blood pressure, and body mass index (BMI). We conducted the analysis using structural equation modeling. Results: We enrolled 75 children, 36 girls and 39 boys with the median interquartile range (IQR) age of 14 (11-16) years and a median (IQR) duration of DM-T1 of 6 (4-9) years. The three focal predictors (cystatin C, resistance index, and urinary KIM-1) were significantly associated with the estimated risk for DKD. Raw path coefficients for cystatin C were 3.16 [95% CI 0.78; 5.53; p = 0.009, false discovery rate (FDR) < 5%], for renal resistance index were -8.14 (95% CI -15.36; -0.92; p = 0.027; FDR < 5%), and for urinary KIM-1 were 0.47 (95% CI 0.02; 0.93; p = 0.040; FDR < 5%). Conclusion: Cystatin C, renal resistance index, and KIM-1 may be associated with the risk for DKD in children and adolescents diagnosed with DM-T1. We encourage further prospective cohort studies to test our results.

5.
Curr Oncol ; 29(8): 5223-5237, 2022 07 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35892984

RESUMEN

Findings on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) after the concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) therapy were inconsistent, and the OUTBACK trial was expected to shed some light regarding the topic. Its results on ACT in LACC were negative, with the conclusion of not to use it. The objective of this review was to present the inconsistencies of previous studies, along with the OUTBACK trial in more detail, and to rethink whether its results provide an unambiguous and definite answer to the optimal position of ACT in the treatment of LACC. To critically appraise the OUTBACK trial and understand the consequences of its results, we used only randomized controlled studies (RCTs) on ACT in LACC that have been included in high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We calculated the pooled prediction intervals using a random effects meta-analysis of all published randomized studies including the OUTBACK trial. After combining the OUTBACK trial with the results of four previous randomized trials, the pooled hazard ratio for overall survival benefit of CCRT + ACT was 0.95 (95% CI 0.75; 1.20). The pooled hazard ratio of the four previous trials was 1.00 (95% CI 0.69; 1.44). The OUTBACK trial improved the precision of the pooled estimate, but the clinical heterogeneity and the consequent prediction intervals are still very wide, and with 95% reliability, we can expect that if the new study, using a similar approach to the ACT, on a randomly selected patient population from the presented five trials is conducted, its hazard ratio for overall survival after ACT would be between 0.47 and 1.93. In conclusion, there is an absolute need for further research in order to optimally define the position of ACT in the treatment of LACC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
J Pers Med ; 12(7)2022 Jul 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35887672

RESUMEN

Today, in the era of precision medicine, the determination of genomic instability or other potentially targetable mutations, along with BRCA 1 and BRCA 2, is a crucial component of the diagnosis and treatment management of advanced ovarian cancer. Advanced technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enabled comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) analysis to become more feasible for routine use in daily clinical work. Here, we present the results for the first two years of an analysis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer on a national level. The aim was to establish the position of CGP in the daily clinical practice of treating ovarian cancer. We performed a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional analysis on the total population of Croatian patients who were newly diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer or whose initial disease had progressed from 1 January 2020 to 1 December 2021, and whose tumors underwent CGP analysis. All 86 patients (100%) analyzed with CGP had at least one genomic alteration (GA). The median LOH was 14.6 (IQR 6.8-21.7), with 35 patients (41%) having an LOH ≥ 16. We found BRCA-positive status in 22 patients (26%). Conventional testing, which detects only BRCA mutations, would have opted for therapy with PARP inhibitors in 22 (26%) of our patients. However, CGP revealed the need for PARP inhibitors in 35 patients (41%). The results identified a significantly higher number of women who would achieve a possible benefit from targeted therapy. Hence, we believe that CGP should be a backbone diagnostic tool in the management of ovarian cancer.

7.
Acta Clin Croat ; 61(4): 636-646, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37868189

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was testing the hypothesis that body height has a moderating effect on the association of weight and chronic low back pain (LBP) induced disability, and that this moderating effect is different in women and men. We performed a nested cross-sectional analysis using data collected at baseline in a prospective cohort study conducted in 2008-2009 at a special hospital for medical rehabilitation in Croatia. The outcome was the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score. The independent variable was body weight. The focal moderators were body height and sex. The moderation analysis was adjusted for seven sociodemographic and clinical covariates. We analyzed data on 72 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 50 (43-55) years, 36 (50%) of whom were women, treated for nonspecific, chronic LBP. The interaction of sex, body weight and height was a significant predictor of the RMDQ score after adjustments for all covariates (increase of R2=0.13; p=0.001; false discovery rate <5%). In both sexes, the correlation between body weight and the RMDQ score was significantly moderated by body height but in opposite ways. In conclusion, the effects of body weight on physical disability are moderated by body height, but this moderation effect differs between women and men.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/rehabilitación , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Estatura , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Peso Corporal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Clin Exp Dent Res ; 8(1): 366-373, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34729949

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) is not satisfactory. Systemic inflammation may play an important role in MDD pathogenesis and treatment outcomes. Periodontal disease is the systemic inflammatory condition. Its prevalence may be as high as 45%. We aimed to assess the association of periodontal status with the outcome of 3-month first-line treatment of MDD with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed the prospective cohort study during 2018/2019 at Psychiatric Hospital "Sveti Ivan," Croatia, on a consecutive sample of 43 patients. The outcome was the MDD symptoms severity measured using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17. The periodontal status was indicated by the clinical attachment loss (CAL). RESULTS: Baseline periodontal status had a nonlinear significant and clinically relevant association with the MDD treatment outcome (R2 change of the quadratic term = 0.12; p = 0.027). In patients with good baseline periodontal status the severity of MDD symptoms was significantly improved. When the value of CAL was ≥4.44 mm, indicating the worse periodontal status, further increase in baseline CAL was associated with the worsening of MDD treatment outcomes independently of the baseline depression severity and 14 sociodemographic and clinical predictors of treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal healthcare is accessible, and should be utilize in an integrative, multidisciplinary approach not only for the sake of psychiatric patients' quality of life and prevention of periodontal disease, but for the sake of the outcomes of psychiatric treatment as well.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Enfermedades Periodontales , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Periodontales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Periodontales/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Calidad de Vida
9.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 31(2): 190-197, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33899747

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there is heterogeneity in the risk factors for skin cancer among the high-risk population in Slovenia, a Central European country with the second-largest age-standardized melanoma-related mortality rate in Europe. METHODS: We analyzed data collected during the 'Euromelanoma Day' 2010-2019. The outcome was the prevalence of newly suspected skin cancer. The independent variables were 17 known risk factors and protective behaviors. We performed a latent class analysis with skin cancer as a covariate. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 1711 participants with a median (interquartile range) age of 52 (39-63) years, 52% of whom were women. During the 10 years, 81 cases of melanoma and 213 cases of other skin cancers were suspected. The model with three latent classes had the best fit. Two latent classes had a high risk for melanoma and other skin cancer: 3 and 19% respectively in class 2; 14 and 29% in class 3. The largest significant differences between the two high-risk classes were the older age and lower frequency of sunscreen use in high-risk class 2 and the number of atypical nevi, a large number of common moles, many moles as the primary motive to participate in Euromelanoma examination and having a skin phototype I or II in the highest-risk latent class 3. CONCLUSIONS: There is heterogeneity in the risk factors for skin cancer among the Euromelanoma high-risk population. This heterogeneity should be tested in other countries, and if the findings are consistent, they should be used to refine secondary prevention programs.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Protectores Solares/uso terapéutico
10.
Pathol Oncol Res ; 27: 1609963, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34646088

RESUMEN

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is gradually becoming an inevitable part of the everyday oncology clinical practice. The interpretation and optimal implementation of the results is one of the hot topics of modern-day oncology. According to the recent findings, uterine cancer harbors a high level of gene alterations but is still insufficiently explored. The primary goal of this project was to assess the proportion of patients with targetable mutations. Also, the aim was to define and emphasize potential opportunities as well as the problems we have faced in the first year of testing on the national level. We performed a multicentric, retrospective, nested cross-sectional analysis on the total population of Croatian patients with advanced/metastatic uterine cancer where the tumor CGP was performed during 2020. CGP of the tumor tissue of 32 patients revealed clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGA) in 27 patients (84%) with a median of 3 (IQR 1-4) CRGA per patient. The most common CRGAs were those of phosphatide-inositol-3 kinases (PIK3) in 22 patients (69%), with 13/22 (59%) of those patients harboring PIK3CA mutation. The next most common CGRAs were ARID1A and PTEN mutations in 13 (41%) and 11 (34%) patients, respectively. Microsatellite status was determined as stable in 21 patients (66%) and highly unstable in 10 patients (31%). A high tumor mutational burden (≥10Muts/Mb) was reported in 12 patients (38%). CGP analysis reported some kind of targeted therapy for 28 patients (88%). CGP determined clinically relevant genomic alterations in the significant majority of patients with metastatic uterine cancer, defining it as a rich ground for further positioning and development of precision oncology.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Uterinas/genética , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Genómica/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación/genética , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Psychiatr Danub ; 33(Suppl 4): 710-718, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34718308

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The functional remission or recovery of schizophrenia patients is a challenging task which relies on pharmacotherapy but also on the timing of psychotherapy and other therapeutic interventions. The study aimed to assess the difference in strength and structure of symptoms networks between early and late phase schizophrenia. Our secondary objective was to check whether the overall, positive, negative, and general symptoms severity change over the course of treatment and disorder. METHODS: This nested cross-sectional analysis combined the samples from two studies performed during 2014-2016 at University Psychiatric Hospital Vrapce, Zagreb, Croatia on the consecutive sample of men 30-60 years old diagnosed with schizophrenia, 85 of them in the early (≤5 years from diagnosis), and 143 in the late phase of the illness. The study was funded by the project: "Biomarkers in schizophrenia - integration of complementary methods in longitudinal follow up of FEP patients". RESULTS: Median (IQR) age of the participant in the early phase was 36 (32-45) years and in the late phase 44 (38-49) years. Patients in the early phase had significantly higher odds for being in the symptomatic remission compared to the patients in the late-phase schizophrenia (OR=2.11; 95% CI 1.09-4.09) and had 10% less pronounced negative symptoms. The global strength, density, and structure of the symptoms network were not significantly different between the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Negative symptoms severity change with the course of illness and differ from the early to the late phase of schizophrenia. However, the overall network of psychotic symptoms is relatively stable, and overall strengths or density and the partial relationship between particular symptoms do not change significantly. The observed worsening of negative symptoms is probably at least partially caused by the lack of clear guidelines and effective treatment options aimed specifically toward negative symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales Psiquiátricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicoterapia , Esquizofrenia/terapia
12.
J Oncol ; 2021: 2815623, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34394349

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although today it is almost preventable, cervical cancer still represents a significant cancer burden, especially in some developing parts of the world. Since the introduction of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic disease, improvements of the outcomes were noted. However, results from randomized controlled trials are often hard to recreate in the real-world setting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as a first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the total population of Croatian patients diagnosed with metastatic cervical cancer from 2016 to 2019 who were treated with bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and paclitaxel (TCB) in the first line. The comparison group was the consecutive sample of patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, incidence of adverse events, and the proportion of treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: We enrolled 67 patients treated with TCB and a control group of 62 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The TCB cohort had significantly longer unadjusted OS with a median of 27.0 (95% CI 18.5; not calculable) months, compared to 15.5 (10.7; 30.1) months in the chemotherapy-alone cohort. Adjusted OS was not significantly different. PFS was significantly longer for the TCB cohort, with a median of 10.6 (95% CI 8.5; 15.4) months, than for the chemotherapy-alone cohort, with a median of 5.4 (95% CI 3.9; 9.1) months, even after adjustment for baseline covariates (HRadjusted = 0.60; 95% CI 0.39; 0.94; p=0.027; false discovery rate <5%). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, TCB as a first-line treatment of metastatic cervical cancer was associated with longer PFS, better objective disease control rate, and acceptable toxicity profile in comparison to chemotherapy alone. These results may indicate its utility and potential applicability in other parts of the developing world.

13.
Psychiatry Res ; 304: 114131, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332430

RESUMEN

Neurocognitive symptoms exert the most influence on treatment outcomes over the course of schizophrenia, starting from the first-episode of psychosis (FEP) onwards. Our aim was to analyze the neurocognitive status of FEP compared to healthy controls (HC), and its change after 18 months of treatment. We performed a study in a sample of 159 patients with FEP and 100 HC. We followed the patients up for 18 months after initial assessment with a battery of neurocognitive tests. We observed statistically significant improvement in the majority of neurocognitive tests after 18 months, but several tests of specific neurocognitive domains (verbal memory, language functions, executive functions) did not show significant differences between the two assessments. The results for the majority of tests obtained from patients with FEP after 18 months of treatment showed significant deterioration compared with HC. Although our study showed significant improvement of baseline neurocognitive deficits in FEP with treatment, this varied across domains and overall performance remained below that of HC. Thus, while it seems that treatment of FEP may help to delay or restore neurocognitive deterioration, it is unclear whether specific areas of neurocognitive deterioration (e.g. verbal domain) would benefit from more time or specific treatment approaches.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Función Ejecutiva , Humanos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico
14.
Oncologist ; 26(7): e1156-e1160, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33856084

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the effects of COVID-19 antiepidemic measures and subsequent changes in the function of the health care system on the number of newly diagnosed breast cancers in the Republic of Croatia. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, population- and registry-based study during 2020. The comparator was the number of patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer during 2017, 2018, and 2019. The outcome was the change in number of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases. RESULTS: The average monthly percent change after the initial lockdown measures were introduced was -11.0% (95% confidence interval - 22.0% to 1.5%), resulting in a 24% reduction of the newly diagnosed breast cancer cases in Croatia during April, May, and June compared with the same period of 2019. However, during 2020, only 1% fewer new cases were detected than in 2019, or 6% fewer than what would be expected based on the linear trend during 2017-2019. CONCLUSION: It seems that national health care system measures for controlling the spread of COVID-19 had a detrimental effect on the number of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases in Croatia during the first lockdown. As it is not plausible to expect an epidemiological change to occur at the same time, this may result in later diagnosis, later initiation of treatment, and less favorable outcomes in the future. However, the effect weakened after the first lockdown and COVID-19 control measures were relaxed, and it has not reoccurred during the second COVID-19 wave. Although the COVID-19 lockdown affected the number of newly diagnosed breast cancers, the oncology health care system has shown resilience and compensated for these effects by the end of 2020. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is possible to compensate for the adverse effects of COVID-19 pandemic control measures on breast cancer diagnosis relatively promptly, and it is of crucial importance to do it as soon as possible. Moreover, as shown by this study's results on the number of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases during the second wave of the pandemic, these adverse effects are preventable to a non-negligible extent.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , COVID-19 , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Croacia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Pandemias , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Croat Med J ; 62(1): 80-89, 2021 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33660964

RESUMEN

AIM: To analyze the difference in the salivary cortisol response to psychosocial stress between the patients with the first episode of psychosis (FEP) and the control group. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline measurements of a prospective cohort study conducted from 2015 to 2018 at two Croatian psychiatric hospitals. The study consecutively enrolled 53 patients diagnosed with FEP and 63 healthy controls. The primary outcome was the difference in the changes of salivary cortisol concentration during the stress test. The secondary outcome was the difference in the baseline levels of salivary cortisol between patients with FEP and controls. The tertiary outcome were the correlations of salivary cortisol levels with the results of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the International Personality Item Pool. RESULTS: Patients with FEP had significantly higher baseline salivary cortisol than controls, but their salivary cortisol increased significantly less during the stress test. CONCLUSION: Patients with FEP respond differently to stressful stimuli than controls, as shown by the increased baseline salivary cortisol and blunted cortisol response, possibly indicating a greater vulnerability to psychosocial stress.


Asunto(s)
Hidrocortisona , Trastornos Psicóticos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Saliva , Estrés Psicológico
16.
Neoplasma ; 68(1): 208-215, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32940046

RESUMEN

The objective of our study was to assess the real-world safety and efficacy of nivolumab in the second- or later-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of real-world data from patients who were treated with nivolumab under a patient expanded access program from 2015 to 2017 in Croatia, Hungary, and Malta. The primary safety endpoint was the discontinuation of therapy because of adverse events. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival (OS). We collected data from 87 patients with a median (interquartile range (IQR)) age of 63 (57-68) years, and 21% were females. The median (IQR) follow-up was 11 (5-31) months. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in 4 (5%) patients. Four (5%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4. The OS was 18.0 (95% CI: 11.0 to 28.6) months, and the PFS was 8.5 (95% CI: 4.9 to 12.1) months. Our study indicated a good safety and efficacy profile of nivolumab in the second- or later-line treatment of mRCC patients in a real-world clinical practice environment, which is comparable with the findings of the registrational trial.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Nivolumab , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Croacia , Femenino , Humanos , Hungría , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Malta , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 271(1): 49-59, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449010

RESUMEN

Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols are being increasingly studied because of their potential to provide quicker and enhanced treatment efficacy. However, there is a lack of accelerated deep TMS with H1-coil (adTMS) treatment research. This randomized pilot study investigated the efficacy and safety of adTMS protocols. Twenty-eight TRD patients received 20-min sessions twice daily for 10 or 15 days. Primary outcomes were changes in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores and discontinuation because of adverse events (AE). Secondary outcomes were response, remission, daily changes in Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scores, and AE incidence. HDRS scores decreased by 13 (95% CI 11-17; 59%, 95% CI 45-73%) and 13 (95% CI 11-14; 62%, 95% CI 54-69%) points in the 10- and 15-day protocols, respectively. The adjusted difference between the two protocols was not significant or clinically relevant. Remission was achieved by 38% and 42% after 10-day and 15-day protocols, respectively. The intervention was discontinued because of AEs in 3/33 (9%) patients. The BDI-II decreases were significant and clinically relevant during the first 8 days. Twice-daily adTMS for 10 days seems to be safe and effective, with rapid clinical benefits during the first week of treatment. These promising results warrant further investigation in larger randomized clinical trials comparing adTMS with the standard dTMS protocol.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Oncol ; 2020: 9246758, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33376489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of real-world data on the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) especially in South East Europe, a region with particularly high incidence and an unfavorable mortality-to-incidence ratio for lung cancer. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC in South East Europe. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study on patients with stage IIIB or IV disease with at least one previous systemic treatment who received nivolumab through an expanded-access program between 2015 and 2017 in Croatia, Malta, and Hungary. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose therapy was discontinued because of toxicity. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We analyzed data on 239 patients with a median (IQR) age of 62 (57-68), and 33% of them were women. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in 11.6% (95% CI 7.8% to 16.5%) of patients. The PFS was 6.4 (95% CI 5.2 to 8.6) months, and the median OS was 14.1 (10.6 to 18.0) months. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of nivolumab in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC in the real-world South East Europe clinical settings were consistent with the results of randomized clinical trials and comparable to the results from other countries.

19.
J Oncol ; 2020: 6423936, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32655639

RESUMEN

Our objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of olaparib in maintenance therapy of BRCA 1-2 mutated, platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma after the partial or complete response to the second or further lines platinum-based chemotherapy in a real-world setting. We performed a multicenter, real-world observational population-based cohort study on the whole population of Croatian patients initiated to olaparib maintenance therapy between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival and the discontinuation of treatment because of adverse events. We enrolled the total population of 69 patients with the median (interquartile range; IQR) age of 53 (48-59), 56 (81%) of them with BRCA1 mutation. The median (IQR) follow-up was 16 (9-25) months. Treatment had to be discontinued because of toxicity in 2 (3%) and temporarily interrupted in 14 (20%), while dose was reduced because of toxicity in 18 (26%) of patients. Toxicity of any grade was observed in 61 (88%) patients and toxicity of grade 3 or 4 in 12 (17%). Median progression-free survival was 21 (95% CI 16-not calculable) months from the introduction of olaparib, and the median overall survival was not reached. Our study confirmed efficacy and safety of olaparib as the maintenance therapy of BRCA 1-2 mutated, platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma. We observed the real-world efficacy and safety comparable to those observed in the randomized controlled trials. We found the interesting observation of better efficacy of 300 mg tablets, compared to 400 mg capsules, an issue that should be addressed on much larger real-world populations.

20.
Acta Clin Croat ; 59(1): 97-108, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32724280

RESUMEN

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) occurs in around one-sixth of all breast cancer (BC) patients, with the most aggressive behavior and worst prognosis of all BC subtypes. It is a heterogeneous disease, with specific molecular characteristics and natural dynamics of early recurrence and fast progression. Due to the lack of biomarkers or any valid treatment targets, it can only be treated with classic cytotoxic chemotherapy. We analyzed a cohort of 152 patients, median age 58 years, diagnosed with and treated for early stage TNBC at the University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia, during the 2009-2012 period. Patients were treated with primary surgical approach, adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant irradiation. We observed a relatively large proportion of locally advanced TNBC at diagnosis, with large tumor size and nodal involvement, with high grade and high proliferation index Ki67. Patient age, tumor size and lymph node involvement, as expected, were significant and clinically most important prognostic factors for 5-year disease-free survival (67%; 95% CI 60%-75%) and overall absolute survival rate (74%; 95% CI 66%-81%).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Croacia/epidemiología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...