Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol ; (18): 169-72, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés, Ucraniano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25191721

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The objective of the study was to analyze the Multiple Myeloma (MM) incidence in clean-up workers preparing the information background for consequent analytical study with a dose-dependent risk estimates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Cohort Database was linked to the Ukrainian National Cancer Registry to identify the MM cases in a cohort of 152 520 male clean-up workers. RESULTS: The 64 MM cases were identified in the studied Cohort for the 1987-2012 period. Fifty-eight of them were included to the preliminary incidence analysis accounting for the 10-years lag-period. According to the preliminary data analysis the MM incidence rate in studied clean-up workers Cohort did not exceed the corresponding rate in general population of Ukraine along the 21 years after the catastrophe. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized incidence ratio for the 2008-2012 period, that is 22-26 years after the accident, demonstrated the significant excess of MM incidence among male clean-up workers in comparison with general population of Ukraine of corresponding age and gender (SIR 1.61, 95% CI 1.01;2.21).


Asunto(s)
Accidente Nuclear de Chernóbil , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Restauración y Remediación Ambiental , Humanos , Incidencia , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/etiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Dosis de Radiación , Ucrania
2.
Radiat Res ; 167(5): 606-14, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17474785

RESUMEN

A cohort of 8,607 Ukrainian Chernobyl clean-up workers during 1986-1987 was formed to study cataract formation after ionizing radiation exposure. Study eligibility required the availability of sufficient exposure information to permit the reconstruction of doses to the lens of the eye. Eligible groups included civilian workers, such as those who built the "sarcophagus" over the reactor, Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Workers, and military reservists who were conscripted for clean-up work. Many of the official doses for workers were estimates, because only a minority wore radiation badges. For 106 military workers, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of extracted teeth were compared with the recorded doses as the basis to adjust the recorded gamma-ray doses and provide estimates of uncertainties. Beta-particle doses to the lens were estimated with an algorithm devised to take into account the nature and location of Chernobyl work, time since the accident, and protective measures taken. A Monte Carlo routine generated 500 random estimates for each individual from the uncertainty distributions of the gamma-ray dose and of the ratio of beta-particle to gamma-ray doses. The geometric mean of the 500 combined beta-particle and gamma-ray dose estimates for each individual was used in the data analyses. The median estimated lens dose for the cohort was 123 mGy, while 4.4% received >500 mGy.


Asunto(s)
Catarata/epidemiología , Catarata/etiología , Accidente Nuclear de Chernóbil , Exposición Profesional , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Espectroscopía de Resonancia por Spin del Electrón , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Radiometría , Ucrania/epidemiología
3.
Radiat Res ; 167(2): 233-43, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17390731

RESUMEN

The eyes of a prospective cohort of 8,607 Chernobyl clean-up workers (liquidators) were assessed for cataract at 12 and 14 years after exposure. The prevalence of strictly age-related cataracts was low, as expected (only 3.9% had nuclear cataracts at either examination), since 90% of the cohort was younger than 55 years of age at first examination. However, posterior subcapsular or cortical cataracts characteristic of radiation exposure were present in 25% of the subjects. The data for Stage 1 cataracts, and specifically for posterior subcapsular cataracts, revealed a significant dose response. When various cataract end points were analyzed for dose thresholds, the confidence intervals all excluded values greater than 700 mGy. Linear-quadratic dose-response models yielded mostly linear associations, with weak evidence of upward curvature. The findings do not support the ICRP 60 risk guideline assumption of a 5-Gy threshold for "detectable opacities" from protracted exposures but rather point to a dose-effect threshold of under 1 Gy. Thus, given that cataract is the dose-limiting ocular pathology in current eye risk guidelines, revision of the allowable exposure of the human visual system to ionizing radiation should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Catarata/etiología , Accidente Nuclear de Chernóbil , Lesiones Oculares/etiología , Cápsula del Cristalino/efectos de la radiación , Corteza del Cristalino/efectos de la radiación , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reactores Nucleares , Radiación Ionizante , Riesgo
4.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 62(2): 141-6, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15607440

RESUMEN

We present here a particular application area for EPR dosimetry with teeth--use as a source of reference dose values for validation/verification of other retrospective dosimetry techniques and existing dose records. The conditions of application of EPR dosimetry in this role as well as practical design of such studies are shown. Particular attention is given to the requirements to the techniques in terms of precision and throughput, as well as to the issue of availability of samples for analysis and practical solution of this problem. Practical application of this approach is illustrated by several examples of completed validation sub-studies, which were performed in the framework of large-scale post-Chernobyl epidemiological studies.


Asunto(s)
Espectroscopía de Resonancia por Spin del Electrón/métodos , Espectroscopía de Resonancia por Spin del Electrón/normas , Radiometría/métodos , Radiometría/normas , Estándares de Referencia , Diente/química , Diente/efectos de la radiación , Benchmarking/métodos , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Internacionalidad , Dosis de Radiación , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 104(2): 103-11, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12918787

RESUMEN

It is commonly assumed that, for a variety of conditions, the E/Hp(10) conversion coefficient is below unity, i.e., Hp(10) can be used as a conservative surrogate of effective dose. The validity of this assumption was checked by Monte Carlo simulation of E and Hp(10) as determined by a practical dosemeter. The calculations concerned irradiation by parallel photon beams with directions varying within a 4pi solid angle and energy ranging from 50 keV to 1 MeV. Observed dependences of conversion coefficients on irradiation geometry, photon energy and dosemeter position demonstrate that in strongly anisotropic radiation fields straightforward application of Hp(10) for assessment of effective dose may lead to significant underestimation of the latter. For photon energy of 80 keV this underestimation may be up to 16-fold. For simulation of real life situations, irradiation by photons coming within broad cones (with solid angle pi) was considered. It was found that even for this irradiation geometry, E/Hp(10) may be as high as 4.3. At the same time, for radiation coming from the frontal hemisphere, the values of the conversion coefficient for a typically positioned (i.e., the left chest pocket) personal dosemeter do not exceed unity. The conclusion was reached that prior to application of Hp(10) as a surrogate of effective dose, the information regarding angular distribution of radiation fields must be taken into account.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia Lineal de Energía , Modelos Biológicos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Fotones , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radioisótopos/análisis , Radiometría/instrumentación , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Método de Montecarlo , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Monitoreo de Radiación/normas , Protección Radiológica/normas , Radiometría/normas , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Dispersión de Radiación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estadística como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA