Influence of a Tourniquet on Opioid Consumption After Local Infiltration Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with ropivacaine is increasingly used to provide postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA may be performed with or without the use of a tourniquet. The absence of local blood flow when infiltrating local anaesthesia below an inflated tourniquet may affect the rate of systemic absorption, and this may have an effect on the duration and intensity of analgesia as compared with LIA without the use of a tourniquet. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of tourniquet use during surgery on the time to first request (TTFR) of opioids and opioid consumption. METHODS: Two historical time-based cohorts (one with and one without tourniquet during surgery) of 300 patients underwent primary TKA under spinal anaesthesia and received LIA to provide postoperative analgesia. The cohorts were compared for TTFR of opioids and opioid consumption. RESULTS: TTFR did not significantly differ between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups with a median (25th-75th percentile) of 240 (102-651) and 282 (100-720) min, respectively. The median (25th-75th percentile) oxycodone use was higher in the tourniquet group with 50 (20-90) versus 40 (10-77.5) mg (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the time to first opioid consumption, suggesting that the presence of an inflated tourniquet during local anaesthetic injection does not alter systemic absorption sufficiently to affect the duration of analgesia. However, the use of a tourniquet was associated with a higher opioid consumption, which is most likely caused by pain resulting from the tourniquet itself.

Pharmacokinetics of 400 mg Locally Infiltrated Ropivacaine After Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Perioperative Tourniquet Use.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with ropivacaine for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly used. Despite the high doses of ropivacaine, LIA is considered safe, and this perception is sustained by pharmacokinetic data demonstrating that maximum concentrations of ropivacaine stay well below the toxic threshold in plasma. These pharmacokinetic studies all involve TKA procedures with the use of a tourniquet. Recently, performing TKA without the use of a tourniquet is gaining popularity, but no pharmacokinetic data exist when LIA is administered for TKA without the use of a tourniquet. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetic profile of a single-shot ropivacaine (200 mL 0.2%) and 0.75 mg epinephrine (1000 µg/mL) when used for LIA in patients for TKA without a tourniquet. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 20 patients treated with LIA for TKA without a tourniquet were studied. Plasma samples were taken at 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 240, 360, 480, 600, 720, and 1440 minutes after local anesthetic infiltration, in which total and unbound ropivacaine concentrations were determined. RESULTS: Results are given as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Median peak ropivacaine concentration was 1.16 µg/mL (IQR, 0.46); median peak unbound ropivacaine concentration was 0.05 µg/mL (IQR, 0.02). The corresponding times to reach the maximum concentration for total and unbound ropivacaine were 360 (IQR, 240) and 360 (IQR, 360) minutes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although great interindividual variability in ropivacaine concentration was found, both total and unbound maximum serum concentrations remained below the assumed systemic toxic thresholds in all samples. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at Netherlands Trial Registry (http://www.trialregister.nl), trial ID NTR6306.

Improving Performance by Monitoring the Success Rate of Peripheral Nerve Blocks.

In our hospital, we introduced a system to measure the collective and individual efficacy of brachial plexus and popliteal nerve blocks with the objective to create transparency as an instrument for monitoring and improvement. Initially, individual results were anonymous, but after 1 year anonymity was lifted within the team of anesthesiologists and results are now discussed quarterly. Collective performance of interscalene, supraclavicular, and popliteal blocks improved significantly over time. Sharing and discussing collective and individual performance has resulted in critical self-appraisal and increased willingness to learn from each other and strengthened the team's ambition for further improvement.