Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg ; 273(5): 890-899, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32224745

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis aims to provide an update on the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and recommendations on using lightweight mesh (LWM) or heavyweight mesh (HWM) in laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. BACKGROUND: LWM might reduce chronic pain through improved mesh flexibility and less fibrosis formation. However, in laparo-endoscopic repair chronic pain is already rare and LWM raise concerns of higher recurrence rates. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in May 2019 in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library for RCTs that compared lightweight (≤50 g/m2) and heavyweight (>70 g/m2) mesh in patients undergoing laparo-endoscopic surgery for uncomplicated inguinal hernias. Outcomes were recurrences, chronic pain, and foreign-body sensation. The level of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by random effect meta-analyses. Trial-sequential-analyses were subsequently performed. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs, encompassing 2909 patients (LWM 1490 vs HWM 1419), were included. The follow-up range was 3 to 60 months. Using LWM increased the recurrence risk (LWM 32/1571, HWM 13/1508; RR 2.21; CI 1.14-4.31), especially in nonfixated mesh direct repairs (LWM 13/180, HWM 1/171; RR 7.27; CI 1.33-39.73) and/or large hernia defects. No difference was determined regarding any pain (LWM 123/1362, HWM 127/1277; RR 0.79; CI 0.52-1.20), severe pain (LWM 3/1226, HWM 9/1079; RR 0.38; CI 0.11-1.35), and foreign-body sensation (LWM 100/1074, HWM 103/913; RR 0.94; CI 0.73-1.20). CONCLUSION: HWM should be used in laparo-endoscopic repairs of direct or large inguinal hernias to reduce recurrence rates. LWM provide no benefit in indirect hernias.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Recurrencia
2.
Surg Endosc ; 35(6): 2583-2591, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32488655

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is considerable demographic overlap of inguinal hernia patients and prostate cancer patients. Previous laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repairs can complicate subsequent radical prostatectomies due to adhesions and distortion of anatomic planes. This study aims to assess the experience of urological surgeons on the safety and feasibility of performing radical prostatectomies after laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study, an online 24 question survey was developed regarding the experience in performing a radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with a prior preperitoneal inguinal hernia mesh repair. Between June 2016 and December 2017, the questionnaire was sent to all 68 urological surgeons performing radical prostatectomy in the Netherlands. RESULTS: The response rate of urological surgeons was 69% (n = 47). The majority (77%) of urological surgeons perform robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies. A previous preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair was reported by 40% of urological surgeons in 10-30% of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Radical prostatectomy with prior preperitoneal inguinal hernia mesh repair is considered more difficult by 49%, predominantly because of (occasionally to always) experienced longer operating times (88.4%), increased blood loss (46.5%), difficult dissection of Retzius space (88.4%), nerve-sparing difficulties (32.6%), less adequate PLND (69.8%), and bladder- (16.3%) or peritoneal perforations (27.9%). Additionally, 11.6% had performed mesh explantation, 16.3% had aborted radical prostatectomies, and 35.7% experienced increased inguinal hernia recurrences after radical prostatectomies with prior preperitoneal inguinal hernia mesh repair. More experienced urological surgeons reported an increased difficulty for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair has a significant impact on performing a radical prostatectomy and PLND. Surgeons should postpone the inguinal hernia repair of patients in the workup for a radical prostatectomy, with the preferable option of performing the radical prostatectomy and inguinal hernia repair in the same procedure. Alternatively, a Lichtenstein repair can be performed.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Cirujanos , Estudios Transversales , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Prostatectomía , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Surgery ; 167(3): 581-589, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31672519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of lightweight mesh for inguinal hernia repair has been suggested to be preferable compared with heavyweight mesh. Nevertheless, surgeons do not use lightweight mesh routinely, possibly owing to the higher price and lack of confidence in evaluation of previous evidence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to update the available randomized controlled trials and provide a recommendation on the use of lightweight mesh or heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in May 2019 in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials comparing lightweight (≤50 g/m2) and heavyweight (>70 g/m2) mesh in patients undergoing open (Lichtenstein) surgery for uncomplicated inguinal hernias. Outcomes were recurrences (overall, after direct or indirect repair), chronic pain (analyzing any and severe pain), and the feeling of a foreign body. The level of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by random effect meta-analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-one randomized controlled trials involving 4,576 patients (lightweight mesh 2,257 vs heavyweight mesh 2,319) were included. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 60 months. No difference between lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh was determined for recurrence rates (lightweight mesh 42 of 2,068 and heavyweight mesh 34 of 2,132; risk ratios 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.96) or severe pain (lightweight mesh 14 of 1,517 and heavyweight mesh 26 of 1,591; risk ratios 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.41). A significant reduction was seen for any pain after lightweight mesh (234 of 1,603) compared with heavyweight mesh (322 of 1,683; risk ratios 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.96) and for the feeling of a foreign body (lightweight mesh 130 of 1,053 and heavyweight mesh 209 of 1,035; risk ratios 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.80). CONCLUSION: Lightweight mesh should be used in open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/prevención & control , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Ann Surg ; 268(2): 241-246, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29303810

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine inguinal hernia recurrence rates 5 years after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair when either lightweight or heavyweight mesh was used. BACKGROUND: Recurrence is an important complication of inguinal hernia surgery. Higher recurrence rates of Ultrapro lightweight meshes after TEP repair have been demonstrated, yet data regarding long-term follow-up are limited. METHODS: From 2010 to 2012, 950 male adult patients with primary unilateral hernias were randomized to TEP hernia repair with heavyweight (Prolene) or lightweight (Ultrapro) mesh. Five years postoperatively, the validated PINQ-PHONE telephone questionnaire was carried out. Participants with a positive questionnaire reply were scheduled for a clinical visit. A recurrence was defined as a clinically detectable bulge in the operated groin on physical examination. RESULTS: Data on development of recurrence could be obtained from 790 patients (83.2% 5-year follow-up rate). Four patients presented with a recurrence at the outpatient clinic between 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Thirty-five patients (4.6%) with a positive PINQ-PHONE reply (60.0% lightweight vs 40.0% heavyweight) were physically examined at the outpatient clinic. In 2 patients (lightweight) a recurrence was detected. The total 5-year recurrence rate after TEP hernia repair was 2.4% (3.8% lightweight, 1.1% heavyweight, P = 0.01). A significantly higher recurrence rate for lightweight mesh in primary direct hernias was found (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The overall recurrence rate 5 years after TEP repair was low. Ultrapro lightweight meshes showed higher recurrence rates than heavyweight meshes and are not recommended for endoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Laparoscopía , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Estudios de Seguimiento , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polipropilenos , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...