Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treating multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Background: Laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common posterior decompression procedures used to treat multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). There is debate on their relative efficacy and safety for treatment of DCM. The goal of this study is to examine outcomes and costs of LF and LP procedures for DCM. Methods: This is a retrospective review of adult patients (<18) at a single center who underwent elective LP and LF of at least 3 levels from C3-C7. Outcome measures included operative characteristics, inpatient mobility status, length of stay, complications, revision surgery, VAS neck pain scores, and changes in radiographic alignment. Oral opioid analgesic needs and hospital cost comparison were also assessed. Results: LP cohort (n=76) and LF cohort (n=59) reported no difference in neck pain at baseline, 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (p>.05). Patients were successfully weaned off opioids at similar rates (LF: 88%, LP: 86%). Fixed and variable costs respectively with LF cases hospital were higher, 15.7% and 25.7% compared to LP cases (p=.03 and p<.001). LF has a longer length of stay (4.2 vs. 3.1 days, p=.001). Wound-related complications were 5 times more likely after LF (13.6% vs. 5.9%, RR: 5.15) and C5 palsy rates were similar across the groups (LF: 11.9% LP: 5.6% RR: 1.8). Ground-level falls requiring an emergency department visit were more likely after LF (11.9% vs. 2.6%, p=.04). Conclusions: When treating multilevel DCM, LP has similar rates of new or increasing axial neck pain compared to LF. LF was associated with greater hospital costs, length of stay, and complications compared to LP. LP may in fact be a less morbid and more cost-effective alternative to LF for patients without cervical deformity.

Factors Associated With Total Discharge Opioid Prescription Morphine Milligram Equivalent Amounts Following Primary Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overuse is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, and orthopaedic surgeons are the third highest prescribers of opioids. Postoperative prescribing patterns vary widely, and there is a paucity of data evaluating patient and surgical factors associated with discharge opioid prescribing patterns after elective anterior cervical surgery (ACS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the volume of postoperative opioids prescribed and factors associated with discharge opioid prescription volumes after elective ACS. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients aged 18 years and older who underwent elective primary anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA), or hybrid procedure (ACDF and CDA at separate levels) at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. Demographic, surgical, and opioid prescription data were obtained from patients' electronic medical records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess for independent associations with discharge opioid volumes. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients met inclusion criteria, including 226 (72.2%) ACDF, 69 (22.0%) CDA, and 18 (5.8%) hybrid procedure patients. Indications included radiculopathy in 63.6%, myelopathy in 19.2%, and myeloradiculopathy in 16.3%. The average age was 57.2 years, and 50.2% of patients were male. Of these, 88 (28.1%) underwent one-level, 137 (43.8%) underwent two-level, 83 (26.5%) underwent three-level, and 5 (1.6%) underwent four-level surgery. Younger age (P = 0.010), preoperative radiculopathy (P = 0.029), procedure type (ACDF, P < 0.001), preoperative opioid use (P = 0.012), and discharge prescription written by a midlevel provider (P = 0.010) were independently associated with greater discharge opioid prescription volumes. CONCLUSION: We identified wide variability in prescription opioid discharge volumes after ACS and patient, procedure, and perioperative factors associated with greater discharge opioid volumes. These factors should be considered when designing protocols and interventions to reduce and optimize postoperative opioid use after ACS.

The Syrian regime's apparatus for systemic torture: A qualitative narrative study of testimonies from survivors.

BACKGROUND: Despite broad interest of the Syrian refugee plight in the academic and media circles, there are still limited studies analyzing the lived experiences of torture survivors under the Syrian regime. This qualitative study interviewed torture survivors to examine the form and function of the Syrian regime's security apparatus, and the personal aftermath of survivors. METHODS: Thirteen in-depth interviews were conducted in Arabic with Syrian refugees who endured torture. Study participants were at least 19 years of age, resided as refugees in Jordan, and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study. Participation was anonymous and no incentives were provided. Only oral consent was required. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and translated to English, and then analyzed for repetitive themes utilizing the narrative approach. RESULTS: Major themes were observed across three experience-phases: pre-captivity, during captivity, and post-captivity. The pre-captivity phase included two sub-themes: the Syrian regime's initial detection and arrest system, and the intelligence system. The captivity phase was also divided into two sub-themes: environmental conditions in detention facilities, and torture methods including physical and psychological torture. Some of the environmental conditions in detention facilities included lack of sanitation, crowding, starvation, and withholding of medical care. Torture methods encompassed beatings, electric shocks, nail-pulling, hanging, drowning, suffocation, rape, and the witnessing of killing, sexual assault, or torture of others. The post-captivity phase included their release from captivity, escaping Syria, and post-displacement conditions and activism. CONCLUSIONS: The Syrian regime employs a vast security apparatus to track, detain, interrogate, torture, and subjugate its civilian population. A systematic mechanism commences even before captivity and continues for years after release, with negative implications on the well-being of survivors, their families, and the Syrian people as a collective community. The Syrian war saw a shift toward mass detention, torture as a form of social punishment, subjugation, and indeterminate imprisonment. Intervention agencies, host countries, and policymakers must be informed of survivors' experiences to better address their needs. Moreover, the international community must advocate for a firm stance against torture, demand justice, and prosecute all parties engaged in perpetuating such extreme forms of suffering and trauma.