Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 40(6): 102276, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31447185

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recent evidence supports the use of ampicillin-sulbactam as a favored choice for antibiotic prophylaxis following head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery. However, there is a paucity of evidence guiding the optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to compare the infection rates of short courses of ampicillin-sulbactam versus extended courses of various antibiotics in head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted from 2012 to 2017 at a tertiary academic center on 266 consecutive patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. The primary outcome measure was the rate of any infection within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: There were 149 patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis for an extended duration of at least seven days. 117 patients received a short course of antibiotics defined as 24 h for non-radiated patients and 72 h for radiated patients. Postoperative infections occurred in 45.9% of patients, of which 92.6% occurred at surgical sites. There was no significant difference in terms of postoperative infection rate between patients receiving an extended duration of antibiotics versus a short duration (p = 0.80). This held true for subgroups of surgical site infections (p = 0.38) and distant infections (p = 0.59 for pneumonia and p = 0.76 for UTI). Risk factors for infections were identified as hypothyroidism (p = 0.047) and clean contaminated wound classification (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Shorter duration of ampicillin-sulbactam prophylaxis in free flap reconstruction of head and neck defects does not negatively affect postoperative infection rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Ampicilina/administración & dosificación , Protocolos Clínicos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/administración & dosificación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
2.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 160(5): 829-838, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30857478

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Length of stay (LOS) includes time medically necessary in the hospital and time waiting for discharge (DC) afterward. This DC delay is determined in head and neck free flap patients. Reasons for and factors leading to DC delay, as well as associated adverse outcomes, are elucidated. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for all head and neck free flap surgeries from 2012 to 2017. Data including demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative factors were collected. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with DC delay. RESULTS: In total, 264 patients were included. Mean total LOS was 13.1 days. DC delay occurred in 65% of patients with a mean of 4.8 days. Factors associated with DC delay on univariate analysis included Medicaid/self-pay insurance, DC to a facility, and not having children ( P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed prolonged medically necessary LOS and surgery on a Monday/Friday ( P < .05) were associated with DC delay. Top reasons for DC delay included case management shortages, rejection by facility, and awaiting supplies. Eleven percent experienced complications during the DC delay. DISCUSSION: DC delay can add days and complications to the LOS. Prevention begins preoperatively with DC planning involving the patient's closest family. Understanding limitations of the patient's insurance may help plan DC destination. Optimizing hospital resources when available should be a focus. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Head and neck free flap patients require a team of teams unified in optimizing quality of care. DC delay is a novel quality metric reflecting the team's overall performance. Through strategic DC planning and capitalizing on available resources, DC delay can be minimized.


Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Laryngoscope ; 128(2): 336-342, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28498522

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Head and neck free flap patients require complex postoperative care. The quality of care for these patients often depends on their management from the time they leave the operating room. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a postoperative inpatient coordinator (IC) for head and free flap patients on quality outcomes: length of stay (LOS), 30-day unplanned return to the emergency department (30dRED), 30-day unplanned readmissions (30dUR), and complication rates. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: One hundred eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent head and neck free flap surgery between January 2012 and January 2016 were reviewed using a prospective database. Patients had an IC for their entire hospitalization (group 1) or for less than their entire hospitalization (group 2). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for quality outcomes. RESULTS: Mean LOS was 13.8 days and 17.3 days in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .002). The 30dRED rate was 12% and 22%, respectively (P = .04). Group 2 had an increased LOS by 4.1 days (P = .001) and a 2.4 fold increased 30dRED (P = .03). 30dUR and complications were not influenced by the IC (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: An IC may help decrease LOS and 30dRED in head and neck free flap patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:336-342, 2018.


Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres/cirugía , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
J Cell Biochem ; 117(4): 959-69, 2016 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26375403

RESUMEN

C-Mpl is the receptor for thrombopoietin (TPO), the main megakaryocyte (MK) growth factor, and c-Mpl is believed to be expressed on cells of the hematopoietic lineage. As MKs have been shown to enhance bone formation, it may be expected that mice in which c-Mpl was globally knocked out (c-Mpl(-/-) mice) would have decreased bone mass because they have fewer MKs. Instead, c-Mpl(-/-) mice have a higher bone mass than WT controls. Using c-Mpl(-/-) mice we investigated the basis for this discrepancy and discovered that c-Mpl is expressed on both osteoblasts (OBs) and osteoclasts (OCs), an unexpected finding that prompted us to examine further how c-Mpl regulates bone. Static and dynamic bone histomorphometry parameters suggest that c-Mpl deficiency results in a net gain in bone volume with increases in OBs and OCs. In vitro, a higher percentage of c-Mpl(-/-) OBs were in active phases of the cell cycle, leading to an increased number of OBs. No difference in OB differentiation was observed in vitro as examined by real-time PCR and functional assays. In co-culture systems, which allow for the interaction between OBs and OC progenitors, c-Mpl(-/-) OBs enhanced osteoclastogenesis. Two of the major signaling pathways by which OBs regulate osteoclastogenesis, MCSF/OPG/RANKL and EphrinB2-EphB2/B4, were unaffected in c-Mpl(-/-) OBs. These data provide new findings for the role of MKs and c-Mpl expression in bone and may provide insight into the homeostatic regulation of bone mass as well as bone loss diseases such as osteoporosis.


Asunto(s)
Regulación del Desarrollo de la Expresión Génica , Osteoblastos/metabolismo , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Osteogénesis/genética , Receptores de Trombopoyetina/genética , Trombopoyetina/genética , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Densidad Ósea , Recuento de Células , Diferenciación Celular , División Celular , Efrina-B2/genética , Efrina-B2/metabolismo , Homeostasis/genética , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Macrófagos/genética , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Macrófagos/metabolismo , Megacariocitos/citología , Megacariocitos/metabolismo , Ratones , Ratones Noqueados , Osteoblastos/citología , Osteoclastos/citología , Osteoprotegerina/genética , Osteoprotegerina/metabolismo , Ligando RANK/genética , Ligando RANK/metabolismo , Receptor EphB2/genética , Receptor EphB2/metabolismo , Receptor EphB4/genética , Receptor EphB4/metabolismo , Receptores de Trombopoyetina/deficiencia , Transducción de Señal , Cráneo/citología , Cráneo/metabolismo , Trombopoyetina/metabolismo
5.
Semin Thromb Hemost ; 37(6): 682-9, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22102271

RESUMEN

The GATA family of transcription factors, including the founding member, GATA-1, have an important role in gene regulation. GATA-1 is integral to successful hematopoiesis. A wide variety of mutations in GATA-1 affect its function, as well as its interaction with its cofactors (especially Friend of GATA) and the genes upon which GATA-1 acts. Here we review the known mutations, focusing on the specific alterations within the amino acid sequence, the resulting effect on hematopoietic development, and the clinical manifestations that result. Attention is also paid to the relationship between Trisomy 21, also known as Down syndrome, and the phenomenon of a truncated GATA-1, named GATA-1s. The evidence for specific interaction between GATA-1 and chromosome 21, which may explain the correlation between these two mutations, is briefly reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Factor de Transcripción GATA1/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Mutación , Trombocitopenia/genética , Sustitución de Aminoácidos , Animales , Síndrome de Down/genética , Humanos , Trombopoyesis/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...