Waning Humoral Response 6 Month after Double Vaccination with the mRNA-BNT162b2 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients.

Introduction: Although most hemodialysis patients (HDP) exhibit an initial seroresponse to vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), studies have shown this response to be lower compared to healthy subjects. This fact raised concerns regarding the durability of the immune response and effective protection against severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in this vulnerable population. The aim of our study was to evaluate the change in antibody levels over time in HDP population. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective multicenter study, evaluating antibody response among HDP at 2 and at 6 months after complete two-dose vaccination course with the mRNA-BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. The study was performed in 14 hemodialysis units of a private dialysis provider in Lithuania. The serum samples of 189 HDP were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG against the Spike glycoprotein. Results: 189 HDP participated in the study. Patients were 64.3±15.7 years of age, 116 (61.4%) were males and 73 (38.6%) were females. Among them, 183 (96.8%) were seropositive for anti-S IgG at 2 months after the second immunization dose. Six months after the second dose only 145 (76.7%) of study participants had positive anti-S IgG titers. The median level of anti-S IgG titers after 2 months was 383.1 BAU/mL (166.2-995.6) and after 6 months this level significantly decreased to 51.4 BAU/mL (22.0-104.0) (p<0.001). Seroresponses at both time points inversely correlated with increasing patient's age. Risk factor for absent response after 2 months included oncologic disease. Systemic autoimmune disease and a history of myocardial infarction increased risk to be seronegative 6 months after the second vaccine dose. Conclusions: The majority of hemodialysis patients seroresponded after BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination, but vaccine-induced humoral immunity wanes over time.

Mortality Prediction in Patients with Severe Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy.

Background and Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a serious health condition around the world, and is related to high morbidity, mortality, longer hospitalization duration and worse long-term outcomes. The aim of our study was to estimate the significant related factors for poor outcomes of patients with severe AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients (n = 573) with severe AKI requiring RRT within a 5-year period and analyzed the outcomes on discharge from the hospital. We also compared the clinical data of the surviving and non-surviving patients and examined possible related factors for poor patient outcomes. Logistic regression was used to analyze the odds ratio for patient mortality and its related factors. Results: In 32.5% (n = 186) of the patients, the renal function improved and RRT was stopped, 51.7% (n = 296) of the patients died, and 15.9% (n = 91) of the patients remained dialysis-dependent on the day of discharge from the hospital. During the period of 5 years, the outcomes of the investigated patients did not change statistically significantly. Administration of vasopressors, aminoglycosides, sepsis, pulmonary edema, oliguria, artificial pulmonary ventilation (APV), patient age ≥ 65 y, renal cause of AKI, AKI after cardiac surgery, a combination of two or more RRT methods, dysfunction of three or more organs, systolic blood pressure (BP) ≤ 120 mmHg, diastolic BP ≤ 65 mmHg, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on the day of the first RRT procedure ≥ 7.5 were related factors for lethal patient outcome. Conclusions: The mortality rate among patients with severe AKI requiring RRT is very high-52%. Patient death was significantly predicted by the causes of AKI (sepsis, cardiac surgery), clinical course (oliguria, pulmonary edema, hypotension, acidosis, lesion of other organs) and the need for a continuous renal replacement therapy.

Assessment of Fluid Status by Bioimpedance Analysis and Central Venous Pressure Measurement and Their Association with the Outcomes of Severe Acute Kidney Injury.

Background and Objectives: Fluid disbalance is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). In this study, we intended to assess fluid status using bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and central venous pressure (CVP) measurement and to evaluate the association between hyperhydration and hypervolemia with the outcomes of severe AKI. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos. Forty-seven patients treated at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with severe AKI and a need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) were examined. The hydration level was evaluated according to the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) of bioimpedance analysis and volemia was measured according to CVP. All of the patients were tested before the first hemodialysis (HD) procedure. Hyperhydration was defined as ECW/TBW > 0.39 and hypervolemia as CVP > 12 cm H2O. Results: According to bioimpedance analysis, 72.3% (n = 34) of patients were hyperhydrated. According to CVP, only 51.1% (n = 24) of the patients were hypervolemic. Interestingly, 69.6% of hypovolemic/normovolemic patients were also hyperhydrated. Of all study patients, 57.4% (n = 27) died, in 29.8% (n = 14) the kidney function improved, and in 12.8% (n = 6) the demand for RRT remained after in-patient treatment. A tendency of higher mortality in hyperhydrated patients was observed, but no association between hypervolemia and outcomes of severe AKI was established. Conclusions: Three-fourths of the patients with severe AKI were hyperhydrated based on bioimpedance analysis. However, according to CVP, only half of these patients were hypervolemic. A tendency of higher mortality in hyperhydrated patients was observed.

Mortality prediction in patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and potentially serious postoperative complication after cardiac surgery, and it remains a cause of major morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to assess the prognostic illness severity score and to estimate the significant risk factors for poor outcome of patients with AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) after cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of adult (>18 years) patients (n=111) who underwent open heart surgery and had developed AKI with need for RRT. Prognostic illness severity scores were calculated and perioperative risk factors of lethal outcome were assessed at the RRT initiation time. We defined three illness severity scores: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) as a general score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) as an organ failure score, and Liano score as a kidney-specific disease severity score. Logistic regression was also used for the multivariate analysis of mortality risk factors. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 76.5%. More than 7% of patients remained dialysis-dependent after their discharge from the hospital. The prognostic abilities of the scores were assessed for their discriminatory power. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of SOFA score was 0.719 (95% CI, 0.598-0.841), of Liano was 0.661 (95% CI, 0.535-0.787) and 0.668 (95% CI, 0.550-0.785) of APACHE II scores. From 16 variables analyzed for model selection, we reached a final logistic regression model, which demonstrated four variables significantly associated with patients' mortality. Glasgow coma score<14 points (OR=3.304; 95% CI, 1.130-9.662; P=0.003), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)<63.5mmHg (OR=3.872; 95% CI, 1.011-13.616; P=0.035), serum creatinine>108.5µmol/L (OR=0.347; 95% CI, 0.123-0.998; P=0.046) and platelet count<115×109/L (OR=3.731; 95% CI, 1.259-11.054; P=0.018) were independent risk factors for poor patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that SOFA score estimation is the most accurate to predict the fatal outcome in patients with AKI requiring RRT after cardiac surgery. Lethal patient outcome is related to Glasgow coma score, mean arterial blood pressure, preoperative serum creatinine and postoperative platelet count.

Changes of etiology, incidence and outcomes of severe acute kidney injury during a 12-year period (2001-2012) in large university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in the quality of critical care, the incidence and mortality of acute kidney injury (AKI) continues to rise. The aim of our study was to analyze the changes during a 12-year period in etiology, incidence and outcomes of severe AKI, which required dialysis, in a large single centre. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of all the patients (n=3215) with severe AKI hospitalized and dialysed in the hospital of Lithuanian university of health sciences Kauno Klinikos (HLUHS KK) during the period of 2001-2012. RESULTS: During a 12-year period, the incidence of severe AKI increased from 154 to 597 cases/p.m.p. The mean age of the patients increased from 58.2±19.2 years in 2001 to 65.7±17 years in 2012 (P<0.001). The number of men (n=2012; 62.6%) was significantly higher than that of women (n=1201; 37.4%; P<0.001). The causes of severe AKI were renal (n=1128; 35.1%), prerenal (n=642; 20%), obstructive (n=310; 9.6%) and in 12.7% of the patients-multifactorial. Overall, the most frequent cause of AKI was acute tubular necrosis (n=1069; 33.2%). The renal replacement therapy (RRT) was discontinued due to improved kidney function in 45.3% of cases. 8.1% of the patients remained dialysis dependent. The mortality rate was 44%. CONCLUSIONS: During a 12-year period, the number of the patients with severe AKI increased three times with the predominance of men and elderly people. There was an observed increase in multifactorial causes of severe AKI; however, ATN remained dominant over the decade. The mortality rate remained high, almost half of the patients died, less than 10% remained dialysis dependent, the rest had the improvement of renal function.

[Administration and dosing of gentamicin (data from Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital)]. / Gentamicino vartojimo ir dozavimo tyrimas (Kauno medicinos universiteto kliniku duomenys).

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to analyze the treatment with gentamicin and possible nephrotoxicity of this antibiotic in patients treated in surgical and internal medicine departments of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 case histories obtained from archive of our hospital were analyzed: 59 case records from surgical and 46 from internal medicine departments. Data were collected regarding indications for the administration of gentamicin, its dosage, duration of treatment, and patients' renal function at the beginning and during the treatment. RESULTS: There were more than 30% of patients older than 65 years. Gentamicin was administered in 14 (23.73%) surgical inpatients to prevent postoperative infection; 45 (76.27%) surgical and 46 (100%) internal medicine inpatients received gentamicin because of symptoms of infection. Half of the patients were treated empirically. In 87.62% of cases, gentamicin was administered at a dose of 240 mg; all 105 patients received it once per day. Before treatment, renal function was not evaluated in 11.86% of surgical and in 19.56% of internal medicine inpatients, and during treatment, it was examined only in one-third of patients. The duration of the treatment was 5.932+/-2.392 days (range 2-13 days) in surgical and 8.283+/-3.344 days (range 3-19 days) in internal medicine inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of patients received empirical treatment with gentamicin. Not enough attention has been paid to the evaluation of renal function before and during treatment. The duration of treatment was too long.

[Survival of hemodialysis patients in Lithuania (data from all hemodialysis centers in the 1998-2005 cohort)]. / Hemodialize gydomu ligoniu isgyvenimas Lietuvoje (1998-2005 m. duomenimis).

BACKGROUND: There is no any official renal registry in Lithuania, so in order to know the exact demographic statistics of patients on hemodialysis, we started to collect data since 1996. The aim of the study was to estimate the survival rate of hemodialysis patients and its dynamics, to compare survival in different groups of sex, age, primary renal disease, and to compare to survival of dialysis patients in Europe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the data of all patients who started hemodialysis in Lithuania between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2005. The information was obtained from medical documentation. The total survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Maier method. RESULTS: During the study period, 2418 patients started hemodialysis (51.7% of males, 48.3% of females). Their mean age at the beginning of treatment was 56.19+/-16.12 years. Death occurred in 792 patients. The main cause of death was cardiovascular events, accounting for 32.3%. The total survival rate of hemodialysis patients in Lithuania at 1 year was 79.97%; at 2 years, 69.18%; at 5 years, 49.97%; at 7 years, 38.3%. Males lived longer than females (log rank P<0.05), but the mean age of females was greater, and survival rate adjusted for age did not differ between the groups. The highest survival rate was in the youngest group (0-19 years old), the lowest - in patients older than 75 years. Diabetic patients lived shorter than nondiabetic patients (log rank P<0.00001). Although patients who start hemodialysis have become older and their survival has been improving, in the 1998-2002 cohort survival was lower as compared to overall survival of patients on dialysis in European countries participating in ERA-EDTA registry. CONCLUSION: Survival of hemodialysis patients in Lithuania in the 1998-2005 cohort depended on age and primary renal disease and despite aging of population on hemodialysis has been improving.