Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Rehabil Med ; 46(10): 1042-5, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25103251

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of manual needle placement for injection of botulinum toxin type A into the forearm muscles of adults with spastic flexed wrist and clenched fist as a consequence of stroke. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. PATIENTS: A total of 41 adults with chronic stroke who were scheduled to receive botulinum toxin type A injection into the following forearm muscles: flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus. METHODS: According to Huber & Heck's atlas suggestions on treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin, surface identification of muscles to inject was performed by means of palpation and anatomical landmarks. Accuracy of needle placement and muscle thickness at the site of needle insertion were assessed using ultrasonography. RESULTS: Overall accuracy of manual needle placement evaluated using ultrasonography was 51.2%. Accuracy was significantly higher for the finger flexors than for the wrist flexors (63.4% vs 39.0%). The finger flexors were significantly thicker than the wrist flexors (mean 1.58 vs 0.49 cm). CONCLUSION: Instrumental guidance should be used in order to achieve an acceptable accuracy of needle placement when performing botulinum toxin type A injections into the forearm muscles of chronic stroke patients with spastic flexed wrist and clenched fist.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Antebrazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espasticidad Muscular/diagnóstico por imagen , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Espasticidad Muscular/fisiopatología , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Agujas , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Muñeca/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
Clin Rehabil ; 28(3): 232-42, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23945164

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of manual needle placement, electrical stimulation and ultrasonography-guided techniques for botulinum toxin injection into the forearm muscles of adults with arm spasticity. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS: Sixty chronic stroke patients with wrist and fingers spasticity. INTERVENTION: After randomization into three groups, each patient received botulinum toxin type A in at least two of these muscles: flexor carpi radialis and ulnaris, flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus (no fascicles selection). The manual needle placement group underwent injections using palpation; the electrical stimulation group received injections with electrical stimulation guidance; the ultrasonography group was injected under sonographic guidance. A sole injector was used. MAIN MEASURES: All patients were evaluated at baseline and four weeks after injection. OUTCOMES: Modified Ashworth Scale; Tardieu Scale; wrist and fingers passive range of motion. RESULTS: One month after injection, Modified Ashworth Scale scores improved more in the electrical stimulation group than the manual needle placement group (wrist: P = 0.014; fingers: P = 0.011), as well as the Tardieu angle (wrist: P = 0.008; fingers: P = 0.015) and passive range of motion (wrist: P = 0.004). Furthermore, Modified Ashworth Scale scores improved more in the ultrasonography group than in the manual needle placement group (wrist: P = 0.001; fingers: P = 0.003), as well as the Tardieu angle (wrist: P = 0.010; fingers: P = 0.001) and passive range of motion (wrist: P < 0.001; proximal interphalangeal joints: P = 0.009). No difference was found between the ultrasonography and electrical stimulation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Instrumental guidance may improve the outcome of botulinum toxin injections into the spastic forearm muscles of stroke patients.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Intramusculares/métodos , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Femenino , Dedos/fisiopatología , Antebrazo , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares/instrumentación , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Espasticidad Muscular/fisiopatología , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Rango del Movimiento Articular/efectos de los fármacos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Muñeca/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA