Urgent request on avian influenza.

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N8 is currently causing an epizootic in Europe, infecting many poultry holdings as well as captive and wild bird species in more than 10 countries. Given the clear clinical manifestation, passive surveillance is considered the most effective means of detecting infected wild and domestic birds. Testing samples from new species and non-previously reported areas is key to determine the geographic spread of HPAIV H5N8 2016 in wild birds. Testing limited numbers of dead wild birds in previously reported areas is useful when it is relevant to know whether the virus is still present in the area or not, e.g. before restrictive measures in poultry are to be lifted. To prevent introduction of HPAIV from wild birds into poultry, strict biosecurity implemented and maintained by the poultry farmers is the most important measure. Providing holding-specific biosecurity guidance is strongly recommended as it is expected to have a high impact on the achieved biosecurity level of the holding. This is preferably done during peace time to increase preparedness for future outbreaks. The location and size of control and in particular monitoring areas for poultry associated with positive wild bird findings are best based on knowledge of the wider habitat and flight distance of the affected wild bird species. It is recommended to increase awareness among poultry farmers in these established areas in order to enhance passive surveillance and to implement enhanced biosecurity measures including poultry confinement. There is no scientific evidence suggesting a different effectiveness of the protection measures on the introduction into poultry holdings and subsequent spread of HPAIV when applied to H5N8, H5N1 or other notifiable HPAI viruses.

The burden of self-reported acute gastrointestinal illness in Italy: a retrospective survey, 2008-2009.

A retrospective telephone survey (n = 3490) was conducted in Italy between 2008 and 2009 to estimate the occurrence of self-reported acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI) and to describe subjects' recourse to healthcare, using a symptom-based case definition. Three hundred and ten AGI cases were identified. The annual incidence rate was 1.08 episodes/person-year (95% confidence interval 0.90-1.14). The proportion of subjects consulting physicians was 39.5% while only 0.3% submitted a specimen for laboratory investigation. Risk factors for AGI and medical care-seeking were identified using logistic regression analysis. Females, children and young adults had a significantly higher incidence rate of AGI. Factors associated with medical care-seeking were age <10 years, presence of fever, diarrhoea, and duration of illness >3 days. Our results provide a relevant contribution towards estimating the global burden of AGI using standard methods that ensure a good level of comparability with other studies.

Carotid endarterectomy: comparing anesthesia in awakened and intubated patients with general anesthesia.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine utility and efficacy of anesthesia with remifentanil in awakened and intubated patients in comparison with general anesthesia and routine shunting. METHODS: Hundred patients were randomized for general anesthesia (group A) or anesthesia with remifentanil (group B). The two groups were compared in terms of postoperative outcome, neurological complications, arterial pressure during intervention and in during the following 36 hours. Group B patients answered a proposed questionnaire about intraoperative and postoperative degree of comfort, fear, pain and discomfort for the orotracheal tube. RESULTS: The two groups differed significantly only for age (group B>A); 10% of patients was not considered fit for the anesthesia with remifentanil (initial experience only). The two groups did not differ in terms of central neurologic complications (0%), general complications or technical problems in terms of intra-operative arterial pressure problems (the anesthesia with remifentanil caused less hypertensive problems (P>0,19) and (not technique-dependent) peripheral neurologic deficits. All patients accepted the method and did not report fear or discomfort. Only 3 patients (6.6%) described light pain during the intervention. In 2 cases (4.4%) the surgeon complained about the restlessness of the patient; this did not cause a change in procedure. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia with remifentanil produces an association between the advantage of locoregional anesthesia and those of general anesthesia, probably lowering the risk for the patients.

Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a child affected with Williams syndrome.

Williams syndrome (WS) is a rare genetical disorder with an incidence of 20-50 000 live births. It is caused by a delation of 1 elastin allele located within chromosome subunit 7q11.23 (long arm). It is characterized by: supravalvular aortic stenosis, multiple peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis, a typical face (elfine face), mental and statural deficiency, characteristic dental malformation, transient hypercalcemia that occurs during the 1(st) year of life. We present the case of a 7-month-old infant affected with WS. In order to clarify the cardiac findings, the baby under-went a MRI investigation, requiring an anesthesiological assistance. In this case a deep sedation approach was carried out by giving chloral hydrate 10% per os (80 mg/kg). We did not perform a general anesthesia in order to avoid the risk related to it. No other drugs were used. During the procedure SpO(2), HR, RR, and ETCO(2) were in normal range; ST tract analysis did not reveal any pathological change The examination lasted 95 minutes; at the end the baby was kept under surveillance in the recovery room for 30 minutes, he could be precociously fed. All the procedure was uneventful.