Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Fibromyalgia Patients Responding to a First Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Induction Course After Six Months of Maintenance Treatment: A Randomized Pilot-Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a chronic painful condition without real, effective treatment. The administration of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to have a therapeutic effect on pain, but there are still questions about the maintenance of its effect over time. Continuation of the treatment upon clinical response through maintenance sessions is promising and merits further exploration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized, parallel-group, controlled study involving 78 patients to evaluate the effect of rTMS vs sham stimulation after a three-week induction treatment and six months of maintenance treatment (three-week periodicity) on 22 patients who presented a clinical response to the induction treatment. The clinical response was defined as a ≥30% decrease of the baseline visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and a score for the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) >5. The clinic global impression, fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, symptom severity score, and Beck's depression inventory were also studied. RESULTS: A significant clinical response to treatment with rTMS was observed after the induction phase and maintained over six months, particularly as measured by the PGIC parameter of pain, as well as of the intensity of fatigue and depression, with an absence of adverse effects induced by this method. CONCLUSION: A three-week rTMS treatment, characterized by a reduction in pain, as evaluated by VAS, should be continued with the administration of rTMS maintenance sessions for an additional six months to maintain the best possible long-term effects.

Predictors of clinical response after rTMS treatment of patients suffering from drug-resistant depression.

Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a therapeutic brain-stimulation technique that is particularly used for drug-resistant depressive disorders. European recommendations mention the effectiveness of 30 to 64%. The failure rate of treatment is high and clinical improvement is visible only after a certain period of time. It would thus be useful to have indicators that could anticipate the success of treatment and more effectively guide therapeutic choices. We aimed to find predictive indicators of clinical improvement at 1 month after the start of rTMS treatment among the data collected during the care of patients with drug-resistant depression included in the Neuromodulation Unit of the Esquirol Hospital in Limoges since 2007. In total, 290 patients with a pharmaco-resistant depressive episode, according to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) (score ≥8), before treatment who underwent a complete course of rTMS treatment and did not object to the use of their collected data were included. The clinical response in routine practice, corresponding to a decrease in the HDRS score of at least 50% from inclusion, was determined and complemented by interquartile analysis. A combination of factors predictive of clinical response during care, such as a short duration of the current depressive episode associated with a higher HDRS agitation item value (or a lower perceived sleepiness value) and a higher number of previous rTMS treatments, were identified as being useful in predicting the efficacy of rTMS treatment in routine clinical practice, thus facilitating the therapeutic choice for patients with drug-resistant depression.