Vitamin E Improves Clinical Outcome of Patients Affected by Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ib.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested, on a few GSD1b patients, that vitamin E improves neutrophil count and reduces frequency and severity of infections.The main objective of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of vitamin E on the neutropenia, neutrophil dysfunction and IBD in the entire Italian caseload of GSD1b patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen GSD1b patients, median age at the time of the study protocol 14.5 (range, 0.6-42 years), were enrolled from four Italian referral centres for metabolic diseases. For the evaluation of the efficacy of vitamin E, neutrophil count and function, frequency of infections needing hospitalization and inflammatory bowel activity were evaluated periodically all over one year before and during vitamin E therapy. RESULTS: Frequency (1.5 ± 0.1 vs. 6.0 ± 0.6, p = 0.003) and severity of infections (2.2 ± 0.2 vs. 3.7 ± 0.4, p = 0.003) were lower and mean value of neutrophil count (1,583 ± 668 vs. 941 ± 809, p = 0.03) higher during vitamin E supplementation. Neutrophil function results improved during vitamin supplementation. PCDAI showed a significant reduction in the inflammatory activity during vitamin E supplementation (9 ± 1.4 vs. 13 ± 1.2, p = 0.006). In seven patients G-CSF requirement decreased and the dose was reduced after the end of the study.In conclusion, our study demonstrated the efficacy of vitamin E supplementation. Vitamin E has evident advantages as compared to G-CSF, as it can be assumed orally, and it has not been associated with severe side effects.

Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSDIa) but not Glycogen storage disease type Ib (GSDIb) is associated to an increased risk of metabolic syndrome: possible role of microsomal glucose 6-phosphate accumulation.

BACKGROUND: In GSDIa, glucose 6-phosphate (G6P) accumulates in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER); in GSDIb, G6P levels are reduced in ER. G6P availability directly modulates the activity of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11ßHSD1), an ER-bound enzyme playing a key role in the development of the metabolic syndrome (MS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of MS and Insulin Resistance (IR) in GSDIa and GSDIb patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study. All the enrolled patients were followed at the Department of Pediatrics "Federico II" University of Naples for 10 years. Clinical and biochemical parameters of MS and the presence of IR were recorded. The results were correlated with the biochemical parameters of GSDI-related metabolic control. 10 GSDIa patient (median age 12.10 ± 1.50), 7 GSDIb patients (median age 14.90 ± 2.20 were enrolled in the study. They were compared to 20 and 14 age and sex matched controls, respectively. 10 GSDIa patients (median age 24.60 ± 1.50) and 6 GSDIb patients (median age 25.10 ± 2.00) completed the 10-year-follow-up. At the end of the study the patients' data were compared to 10 and 6 age and sex matched controls, respectively. RESULTS: At study entry, 20 % GSDIa patients had MS and 80 % showed 2 criteria for MS. GSDIa patients showed higher HOMA-IR than controls and GSDIb patients (p < 0.001, p < 0.05), respectively. Baseline ISI was lower in GSDIa than controls (p < 0.001). QUICKI was significantly lower in GSDIa than in controls (p < 0.001). At the end of the study 70 % of GSDIa patients had MS and 30 % showed 2 criteria for MS. HOMA-IR was higher in GSDIa than controls (p < 0.01). Baseline ISI was higher in GSDIb than controls (p < 0.005) and GSD1a (p < 0.05). QUICKI was lower in GSD1a patients than in controls (p < 0.03). VAI was higher in GSDIa patients than controls (p < 0.001) and GSDIb patients (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed high prevalence of IR and MS in GSDIa patients. We speculate a possible role of 11ßHSD1 modulation by G6P availability. We suggest a routine metabolic assessment in GSDIa patients.

Progression of renal damage in glycogen storage disease type I is associated to hyperlipidemia: a multicenter prospective Italian study.

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors decrease glomerular hyperfiltration but not microalbuminuria and proteinuria in glycogen storage disease type I. In the current study, we demonstrated that severe hyperlipidemia is associated with ACE-inhibitor ineffectiveness. We underline the importance of adequate metabolic control in glycogen storage disease type I. A combination therapy with ACE-inhibitors and lipid lowering drugs might be considered.

Involvement of endocrine system in a patient affected by glycogen storage disease 1b: speculation on the role of autoimmunity.

Glycogen storage disease type 1b (GSD1b) is an inherited metabolic defect of glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis due to mutations of the SLC37A4 gene and to defective transport of glucose-6-phosphate. The clinical presentation of GSD1b is characterized by hepatomegaly, failure to thrive, fasting hypoglycemia, and dyslipidemia. Patients affected by GSD1b also show neutropenia and/or neutrophil dysfunction that cause increased susceptibility to recurrent bacterial infections. GSD1b patients are also at risk for inflammatory bowel disease. Occasional reports suggesting an increased risk of autoimmune disorders in GSD1b patients, have been published. These complications affect the clinical outcome of the patients. Here we describe the occurrence of autoimmune endocrine disorders including thyroiditis and growth hormone deficiency, in a patient affected by GSD1b. This case further supports the association between GSD1b and autoimmune diseases.

The growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor axis in glycogen storage disease type 1: evidence of different growth patterns and insulin-like growth factor levels in patients with glycogen storage disease type 1a and 1b.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system in patients with glycogen storage disease type 1 (GSD1). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, case-control study. Ten patients with GSD1a and 7 patients with GSD1b who were given dietary treatment and 34 sex-, age-, body mass index-, and pubertal stage-matched control subjects entered the study. Auxological parameters were correlated with circulating GH, either at basal or after growth hormone releasing hormone plus arginine test, insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II), and anti-pituitary antibodies (APA). RESULTS: Short stature was detected in 10.0% of patients with GSD1a, 42.9% of patients with GSD1b (P = .02), and none of the control subjects. Serum IGF-I levels were lower in patients with GSD1b (P = .0001). An impaired GH secretion was found in 40% of patients with GSD1a (P = .008), 57.1% of patients with GSD1b (P = .006), and none of the control subjects. Short stature was demonstrated in 3 of 4 patients with GSD1b and GH deficiency. The prevalence of APA was significantly higher in patients with GSD1b than in patients with GSD1a (P = .02) and control subjects (P = .03). The GH response to the provocative test inversely correlated with the presence of APA (P = .003). Compared with levels in control subjects, serum IGF-II and insulin levels were higher in both groups of patients, in whom IGF-II levels directly correlated with height SD scores (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Patients with GSD1a have an impaired GH secretion associated with reference range serum IGF-I levels and normal stature, whereas in patients with GSD1b, the impaired GH secretion, probably because of the presence of APA, was associated with reduced IGF-I levels and increased prevalence of short stature. The increased IGF-II levels, probably caused by increased insulin levels, in patients with GSD1 are presumably responsible for the improved growth pattern observed in patients receiving strict dietary treatment.