Utility of a next generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the industrial chemical benzene.

We recently published a next generation framework for assessing the risk of genomic damage via exposure to chemical substances. The framework entails a systematic approach with the aim to quantify risk levels for substances that induce genomic damage contributing to human adverse health outcomes. Here, we evaluated the utility of the framework for assessing the risk for industrial chemicals, using the case of benzene. Benzene is a well-studied substance that is generally considered a genotoxic carcinogen and is known to cause leukemia. The case study limits its focus on occupational and general population health as it relates to benzene exposure. Using the framework as guidance, available data on benzene considered relevant for assessment of genetic damage were collected. Based on these data, we were able to conduct quantitative analyses for relevant data sets to estimate acceptable exposure levels and to characterize the risk of genetic damage. Key observations include the need for robust exposure assessments, the importance of information on toxicokinetic properties, and the benefits of cheminformatics. The framework points to the need for further improvement on understanding of the mechanism(s) of action involved, which would also provide support for the use of targeted tests rather than a prescribed set of assays. Overall, this case study demonstrates the utility of the next generation framework to quantitatively model human risk on the basis of genetic damage, thereby enabling a new, innovative risk assessment concept. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:94-113, 2020. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Environmental Mutagen Society.

Global regulatory requirements for mutagenicity assessment in the registration of industrial chemicals.

Mutagenicity is an important toxicological endpoint that requires thorough evaluation during the industrial chemical registration process. Regulatory requirements for mutagenicity assessment in registration of industrial chemicals vary in geographic regions (and in some cases by intended application). Here we compile the mutagenicity testing requirements for registration of industrial chemicals from representative geographic regions (in alphabetical order), that is Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, European Union (EU), India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and United States (US). We further discuss the challenges that industry is facing to meet global regulations, for example, different testing requirements among geographic regions, different strategies in follow-up tests to in vitro positive findings, no-observed-adverse-effect-levels in genetic toxicity testing, and human relevance of mutagenicity. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 58:345-353, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Use of genetic toxicity data in GHS mutagenicity classification and labeling of substances.

One of the key outcomes of testing the potential genotoxicity or mutagenicity of a substance is the conclusion on whether the substance should be classified as a germ cell mutagen and the significance of this for other endpoints such as carcinogenicity. The basis for this conclusion are the criteria presented in classification and labelling systems such as the Globally Harmonized System for classification and labeling (GHS). This article reviews the classification criteria for germ cell mutagenicity and carcinogenicity and how they are applied to substances with evidence of mutagenicity. The implications and suitability of such a classification for hazard communication, risk assessment, and risk management are discussed. It is proposed that genotoxicity assessments should not focus on specifically identifying germ cell mutagens, particularly given the challenges associated with communicating this information in a meaningful way. Rather the focus should be on deriving data to characterize the mode of action and for use in the risk assessment of mutagens, which could then feed into a more robust, risk based management of mutagenic substances versus the current more hazard based approaches. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 58:354-360, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparative metabolism and pharmacokinetics of diisobutyl ketone and diisobutyl carbinol in male SD rats.

Diisobutyl ketone (DIBK) and diisobutyl carbinol (DIBC) are important organic solvents widely used as industrial intermediates. It was hypothesized that DIBC and DIBK have common metabolic pathways and metabolites, and as such, toxicological data on DIBK could be used to characterize the hazards of DIBC. To confirm or refute this hypothesis a comparative metabolism and pharmacokinetics assessment of DIBK and DIBC was conducted. Dosing was via single oral gavage dosing in male SD rats, followed by blood collection, metabolite identification, major biomarker quantitation, and pharmacokinetics analysis. Overall, the major metabolites of both DIBC and DIBK in blood were their corresponding monohydroxylated metabolites (DIBC alcohol and DIBK alcohol) with the site of hydroxylation at the σ and σ-1 positions, respectively. Quantitative analysis of DIBC, DIBK, DIBC-alcohol, and DIBK-alcohol in blood samples collected from 5min to 120h after single dosing indicated the following: (1) DIBC and DIBK are both well absorbed following oral gavage with substantial evidence of enterohepatic recirculation of DIBK, DIBC, DIBK-alcohol, and DIBC-alcohol; (2) DIBK and DIBC are interconverted metabolically in rats; (3) DIBC and DIBK have similar bioavailability after oral administration; (4) higher systemic exposure was found for DIBK-alcohol than DIBC-alcohol, implying that DIBC-alcohol may be more easily conjugated and eliminated in bile. In summary, the metabolic similarities and the difference in systemic exposure to metabolites between these substances observed in the current study support the hypothesis that DIBC might have a lower potential toxicity than that of DIBK. The current study results support that toxicological data on DIBK could be used to characterize the hazards of DIBC.