Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Med Res ; 28(1): 16, 2023 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36624515

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic heart transplantation (HTX) is the gold standard to treat end-stage heart failure. Numerous risk stratification tools have been developed in the past years. However, their clinical utility is limited by their poor discriminative ability. High sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) is the most specific biomarker to detect myocardial cell injury. However, its prognostic relevance after HTX is not fully elucidated. Thus, this study evaluated the predictive value of postoperative hsTnT for 1-year survival and days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) after HTX. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent HTX at the University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany between 2011 and 2021. The main exposure was hsTnT concentration at 48 h after HTX. The primary endpoints were mortality and DAOH within 1 year after surgery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, logistic regression model and linear regression with adjustment for risk index for mortality prediction after cardiac transplantation (IMPACT) were performed. RESULTS: Out of 231 patients screened, 212 were included into analysis (mean age 55 ± 11 years, 73% male). One-year mortality was 19.7% (40 patients) and median DAOH was 298 days (229-322). ROC analysis revealed strongest discrimination for mortality by hsTnT at 48 h after HTX [AUC = 0.79 95% CI 0.71-0.87]. According to Youden Index, the cutoff for hsTnT at 48 h and mortality was 1640 ng/l. After adjustment for IMPACT score multivariate logistic and linear regression showed independent associations between hsTnT and mortality/DAOH with odds ratio of 8.10 [95%CI 2.99-21.89] and unstandardized regression coefficient of -1.54 [95%CI -2.02 to -1.06], respectively. CONCLUSION: Postoperative hsTnT might be suitable as an early prognostic marker after HTX and is independently associated with 1-year mortality and poor DAOH.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Troponina T , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitales , Miocardio/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Troponina T/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía
2.
Clin Transplant ; 37(4): e14887, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36527302

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has tremendously impacted health care all around the globe. We analyzed the impact of the pandemic on donors, recipients, and outcome of heart transplantation (HTx). METHODS: Between 2010 and early 2022, a total of n = 235 patients underwent HTx in our department. Patients were assigned to the study groups regarding the date of the performed HTx. Group 1 (09/2010 to 02/2020): n = 160, Group 2 (03/2020 to 02/2022): n = 75. RESULTS: Since the pandemic, the etiology of heart failure in the recipients has shifted from dilated (Group 1: 53.8%, Group 2: 32.0%) to ischemic cardiomyopathy (Group 1: 39.4%, Group 2: 50.7%, p < .01). The percentage of high urgency status of the recipients dropped from 50.0% to 36.0% (p = .05), and the use of left ventricular assist (LVAD) support from 56.9% to just 37.3% (p < .01). Meanwhile, the waiting time for the recipients also decreased by about 40% (p = .05). Since the pandemic, donors were 2- times more likely to have been previously resuscitated (Group 1: 21.3%, Group 2: 45.3% (p < .01), and drug abuse increased by more than 3-times (p < .01), indicating acceptance of more marginal donors. Surprisingly, the incidence of postoperative severe primary graft dysfunction requiring extracorporeal life support decreased from 33.1% to 19.4% (p = .04) since the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic affected both donors and recipients of HTX but not the postoperative outcome. Donors nowadays are more likely to suffer from ischemic heart disease and are less likely to be on the high-urgency waitlist and on LVAD support. Simultaneously, an increasing number of marginal donors are accepted, leading to shorter waiting times.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Isquemia Miocárdica , Humanos , Pandemias , Resultado del Tratamiento , COVID-19/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Donantes de Tejidos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Life (Basel) ; 12(12)2022 Nov 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36556331

RESUMEN

The two main surgical options to treat end-stage heart failure are heart transplantation (HTx) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In hemodynamically stable patients, the decision for HTx listing with or without LVADs is challenging. We analyzed the impact of both options on days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) and survival. This retrospective study screened all patients with HTx or LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2020. The main inclusion criterion was hemodynamic stability defined as independence of intravenous inotropic/vasoactive support at decision. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. The primary endpoint was DAOH within one year after the decision. Secondary endpoints included survival, duration until HTx, and hospitalizations. In total, 187 patients received HTx and 227 patients underwent LVAD implantation. There were 21 bridge-to-transplant (BTT)-LVAD patients (implantation less than a month after HTx listing or listing after implantation) and 44 HTx-waiting patients included. PSM identified 17 matched pairs. Median DAOH at one year was not significantly different between the groups (BTT-LVAD: median 281, IQR 89; HTx waiting: median 329, IQR 74; p = 0.448). Secondary endpoints did not differ significantly. Our data suggest that BTT-LVAD implantation may not be favorable in terms of DAOH within one year for hemodynamically stable patients compared to waiting for HTx. Further investigations on quality of life and long-term outcomes are warranted.

4.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 14(3): 349-52, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25476237

RESUMEN

Invasive fungal infection after solid-organ transplantation is known as a severe complication and carries with it a high risk of infection-related mortality. Among patients after heart transplant Aspergillus species most often cause atypical pneumonia. The incidence of invasive aspergillosis after heart transplant has been reported from 3% to 14%. It is the opportunistic pathogen with the highest mortality, ranging from 50% to 80%. Prompt antifungal therapy is crucial, but rapid diagnostic procedures with sufficient sensitivity and specificity are lacking at the moment. We present a rare case of a patient with massive metastasizing invasive aspergillosis within 1 month after heart transplant, undetected before death.


Asunto(s)
Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Infecciones Oportunistas/diagnóstico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Angiografía Cerebral/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Errores Diagnósticos , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/microbiología , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Oportunistas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Oportunistas/microbiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sepsis/microbiología , Sepsis/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...