Standardization and Visualization of the Surgical Time-Out.

INTRODUCTION: The time-out (TO) can prevent adverse events but is subject to TO engagement. We hypothesize transforming the TO to an auditable, active process will improve compliance and engagement. METHODS: The passive nature of the current TO was identified as a potential safety issue on staff patient safety culture surveys. Subsequently, the Time Out Engagement and Standardization quality improvement initiative was developed and included a whiteboard checklist to be used in the operating room. As a baseline, 11 TOs were audited concerning engagement and content. Key stakeholders were engaged to determine potential interventions. A TO consisting of 15 elements using a TO whiteboard checklist with role-specific objectives was developed. Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles commenced. After implementation, 17 TOs were audited based on engagement and content. RESULTS: Before intervention, engagement varied with nurse participating in 100% compared with anesthesia provider or surgeon participating in 18%. No TO included all 15 elements and only 13% of elements included in all TOs. After implementation of Time Out Engagement and Standardization, anesthesia and surgeon who participated increased to 100% and 76.5%, respectively (P < 0.0001, P = 0.006). The 15 standardized elements of the TO were discussed in 90% of cases. Overall, preintervention 88 elements (57.1%) were completed across all TOs, while postintervention 243 elements (98.8%) were completed (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a need for increased engagement of the TO based on staff concerns, which were verified through auditing. Implementation of a team-driven intervention and 3 rapid Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles led to measurable improvement of the surgical TO.

Procedure-Based Telehealth Utilization in General Surgery.

The authors hypothesize that standardized telehealth (TH) scheduling processes will improve TH utilization without increasing adverse events. Fifty visits preimplementation and 67 visits postimplementation were audited from June 2021 to January 2022. Both leadership and frontline stakeholders were engaged to identify current workflows and potential interventions targeting outpatient elective procedures. Process mapping outlined current TH scheduling workflows. Outcomes related to TH completion, cost, and TH scheduling were collected after implementation. Preimplementation TH scheduling rate was 32%. The intervention required TH postoperative appointments to be scheduled in clinic at the time of surgery scheduling with TH being the default postsurgical appointment for a standardized list of eligible procedures. Following implementation, 95% of patients undergoing eligible procedures had TH follow-up. This provided improved access to surgical follow-up care, by reducing travel needs to the Veterans Affairs facility. Secondarily, this intervention increased clinic appointment availability and resulted in possible increased revenue for billable visits. Standardizing TH scheduling based on the procedure improves the utilization of TH resulting in improved clinic efficiency and increased revenue, without increasing adverse events.

The relationship between intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Previous observations suggest that intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) is a risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. IBT alters immune function and may predispose to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). METHODS: Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database were studied over a 5-year period. Logistic regression identified predictors of SIRS. Propensity matching was used to obtain a balanced set of patients with equivalent preoperative risks for IBT. RESULTS: Of 553,288 inpatients, 19,968 (3.6%) developed postoperative SIRS, and 40,378 (7.2%) received IBT. Mortality in patients with SIRS was 13-fold higher than in those without SIRS (13.5% vs 1.0%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis identified the amount of blood transfused during IBT as a significant predictor for development of SIRS (odds ratio, 2.2; P < .0001). After propensity matching, 33,507 matched patients with IBT had significantly increased risk for SIRS compared with non-SIRS matched patients (12.0% vs 6.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant association between IBT and the development of SIRS. IBT may induce SIRS, and reductions in IBT may decrease the incidence of postoperative SIRS.