QA for helical tomotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 148.

Helical tomotherapy is a relatively new modality with integrated treatment planning and delivery hardware for radiation therapy treatments. In view of the uniqueness of the hardware design of the helical tomotherapy unit and its implications in routine quality assurance, the Therapy Physics Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine commissioned Task Group 148 to review this modality and make recommendations for quality assurance related methodologies. The specific objectives of this Task Group are: (a) To discuss quality assurance techniques, frequencies, and tolerances and (b) discuss dosimetric verification techniques applicable to this unit. This report summarizes the findings of the Task Group and aims to provide the practicing clinical medical physicist with the insight into the technology that is necessary to establish an independent and comprehensive quality assurance program for a helical tomotherapy unit. The emphasis of the report is to describe the rationale for the proposed QA program and to provide example tests that can be performed, drawing from the collective experience of the task group members and the published literature. It is expected that as technology continues to evolve, so will the test procedures that may be used in the future to perform comprehensive quality assurance for helical tomotherapy units.

Helical tomotherapy quality assurance.

Helical tomotherapy uses a dynamic delivery in which the gantry, treatment couch, and multileaf collimator leaves are all in motion during treatment. This results in highly conformal radiotherapy, but the complexity of the delivery is partially hidden from the end-user because of the extensive integration and automation of the tomotherapy control systems. This presents a challenge to the medical physicist who is expected to be both a system user and an expert, capable of verifying relevant aspects of treatment delivery. A related issue is that a clinical tomotherapy planning system arrives at a customer's site already commissioned by the manufacturer, not by the clinical physicist. The clinical physicist and the manufacturer's representative verify the commissioning at the customer site before acceptance. Theoretically, treatment could begin immediately after acceptance. However, the clinical physicist is responsible for the safe and proper use of the machine. In addition, the therapists and radiation oncologists need to understand the important machine characteristics before treatment can proceed. Typically, treatment begins about 2 weeks after acceptance. This report presents an overview of the tomotherapy system. Helical tomotherapy has unique dosimetry characteristics, and some of those features are emphasized. The integrated treatment planning, delivery, and patient-plan quality assurance process is described. A quality assurance protocol is proposed, with an emphasis on what a clinical medical physicist could and should check. Additionally, aspects of a tomotherapy quality assurance program that could be checked automatically and remotely because of its inherent imaging system and integrated database are discussed.

A helical tomotherapy dynamic quality assurance.

A multifaceted tomotherapy quality assurance procedure has been developed. This procedure tests most of the features inherent in the tomotherapy Hi-Art device. This includes the megavoltage imaging quality, spatial and temporal accuracy of the dynamic delivery properties, as well as more traditional beam output characteristics. This is accomplished with a specialized multichannel electrometer that measures collected charge every 100 ms and a Virtual Water cylindrical phantom that holds many ion chambers and differing density insert plugs. Both devices are offered with the Hi-Art product. These tests are presented as well as their sensitivity to beam and delivery variations.

Radiation shielding design of a new tomotherapy facility.

It is expected that intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) will replace a large portion of radiation therapy treatments currently performed with conventional MLC-based 3D conformal techniques. IGRT may become the standard of treatment in the future for prostate and head and neck cancer. Many established facilities may convert existing vaults to perform this treatment method using new or upgraded equipment. In the future, more facilities undoubtedly will be considering de novo designs for their treatment vaults. A reevaluation of the design principles used in conventional vault design is of benefit to those considering this approach with a new tomotherapy facility. This is made more imperative as the design of the TomoTherapy system is unique in several aspects and does not fit well into the formalism of NCRP 49 for a conventional linear accelerator.

Helical tomotherapy radiation leakage and shielding considerations.

Leakage radiation and room shielding considerations increase significantly for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments due to the increased beam-on time to deliver modulated fields. Tomotherapy, with its slice by slice approach to IMRT, further exacerbates this increase. Accordingly, additional shielding is used in tomotherapy machines to reduce unwanted radiation. The competing effects of the high modulation and the enhanced shielding were studied. The overall room leakage radiation levels are presented for the continuous gantry rotations, which are always used during treatments. The measured leakage at 4 m from the isocenter is less than 3 x 10(-4) relative to calibration output. Primary radiation exposure levels were investigated as well. The effect of forward-directed leakage through the beam-collimation system was studied, as this is the leakage dose the patient would receive in the course of a treatment. A 12-min treatment was calculated to produce only 1% patient leakage dose to the periphery region. Longer treatment times might yield less patient dose if the field width selected is correspondingly narrower. A method for estimating the worst-case leakage dose a patient would receive is presented.

Dose calibration of nonconventional treatment systems applied to helical tomotherapy.

Current dosimetric protocols based on the absorbed dose (AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 protocols) require calibration measurements under reference conditions. For some radiotherapy systems, this requirement cannot be met, and calibration has to be performed under nonreference experimental conditions. In order to solve this problem, both protocols can be extended by inclusion of the measured-to-reference conversion factor, k(mr). In order to determine this factor, basic dosimetric quantities, like stopping power ratios, mass attenuation coefficients and chamber correction factors have to be calculated. If measurements are not feasible, accurate Monte Carlo modeling is required. The extension of the protocols is illustrated using the case of the helical tomotherapy radiation unit, where the typical calibration measurement conditions are the 10 x 5 cm2 field size and the 85 cm surface source distance, limited by the system design. It was calculated that the k(mr) factor for this conditions is close to unity (0.997+/-0.001). In addition, the deviation of the measurement conditions from the reference conditions results in the change of the quality conversion factor (approximately 0.995-0.998, depending on the ionization chamber used). This change is the same regardless of the used calibration protocol. For smaller field sizes the corrections become more significant, resulting in the total correction factor compared to the reference conditions of up to 1.5% for the smallest considered field size of 2 x 2 cm2.

The utility of megavoltage computed tomography images from a helical tomotherapy system for setup verification purposes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of relatively low-dose megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) images from a clinical helical tomotherapy system for setup verification purposes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cross-sectional kilovolt computed tomography (kVCT) images were obtained for treatment planning purposes on a diagnostic third-generation CT scanner, followed by MVCT images from a helical tomotherapy system in 8 pet dogs with spontaneously occurring tumors. The kVCT and MVCT images were aligned for setup verification purposes, allowing repositioning before treatment delivery. RESULTS: Tumors are readily visualized on the MVCT images. At a dose of 2-3 cGy, the MVCT images are of sufficient quality for verification of treatment setup, but soft-tissue contrast is inferior to that with conventional kVCT. The MV and kVCT images were successfully aligned. When necessary, patients undergoing helical tomotherapy were repositioned before treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Megavoltage CT image quality is sufficient for tumor identification and three-dimensional setup verification in dogs with spontaneous tumors. The MVCT images can be aligned with the planning kVCT to ensure proper patient registration before treatment. Image alignment was successful in these canine patients, despite no skin markings defining patient positioning between the two scans. MVCT images facilitate setup verification, and their tomographic nature offers improvements over conventional portal imaging.

Radiation characteristics of helical tomotherapy.

Helical tomotherapy is a dedicated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) system with on-board imaging capability (MVCT) and therefore differs from conventional treatment units. Different design goals resulted in some distinctive radiation field characteristics. The most significant differences in the design are the lack of flattening filter, increased shielding of the collimators, treatment and imaging operation modes and narrow fan beam delivery. Radiation characteristics of the helical tomotherapy system, sensitivity studies of various incident electron beam parameters and radiation safety analyses are presented here. It was determined that the photon beam energy spectrum of helical tomotherapy is similar to that of more conventional radiation treatment units. The two operational modes of the system result in different nominal energies of the incident electron beam with approximately 6 MeV and 3.5 MeV in the treatment and imaging modes, respectively. The off-axis mean energy dependence is much lower than in conventional radiotherapy units with less than 5% variation across the field, which is the consequence of the absent flattening filter. For the same reason the transverse profile exhibits the characteristic conical shape resulting in a 2-fold increase of the beam intensity in the center. The radiation leakage outside the field was found to be negligible at less than 0.05% because of the increased shielding of the collimators. At this level the in-field scattering is a dominant source of the radiation outside the field and thus a narrow field treatment does not result in the increased leakage. The sensitivity studies showed increased sensitivity on the incident electron position because of the narrow fan beam delivery and high sensitivity on the incident electron energy, as common to other treatment systems. All in all, it was determined that helical tomotherapy is a system with some unique radiation characteristics, which have been to a large extent optimized for intensity modulated delivery.

Benchmarking beam alignment for a clinical helical tomotherapy device.

A clinical helical tomotherapy treatment machine has been installed at the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center. Beam alignment has been finalized and accepted by UW staff. Helical tomotherapy will soon be clinically available to other sites. Clinical physicists who expect to work with this machine will need to be familiar with its unique dosimetric characteristics, and those related to the geometrical beam configuration and its verification are described here. A series of alignment tests and the results are presented. Helical tomotherapy utilizes an array of post-patient xenon-filled megavoltage radiation detectors. These detectors have proved capable of performing some alignment verification tests. That is particularly advantageous because those tests can then be automated and easily performed on an ongoing basis.

Clinical helical tomotherapy commissioning dosimetry.

Helical tomotherapy presented many unique dosimetric challenges and solutions during the initial commissioning process, and some of them are presented. The dose calculation algorithm is convolution/superposition based. This requires that the energy fluence spectrum and magnitude be quantified. The methodology for doing so is described. Aspects of the energy fluence characterization that are unique to tomotherapy are highlighted. Many beam characteristics can be measured automatically by an included megavoltage computed tomography imaging system. This greatly improves data collection efficiency.