Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 2(3): 311-319, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31200846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with prostate-specific-antigen density (PSAd) enhances the detection of significant prostate cancer (sPCa). However, it is unclear whether simple biparametric (bp) MRI, which reduces scan sequences, time, and cost, may be an equally effective noninvasive tool for detecting and ruling out sPCa and avoiding biopsies in biopsy-naïve men. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy, predictive values, and best biopsy strategy combining bpMRI and PSAd in detecting and ruling out sPCa (Gleason score ≥7). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Assessment of 808 biopsy-naïve men with clinical suspicion of localised PCa (prostate-specific antigen <20ng/ml, rectal examination

Asunto(s)
Calicreínas/sangre , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
2.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 22(4): 609-616, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30988407

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer risk prediction models and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are used for individualised pre-biopsy risk assessment. However, biparametric MRI (bpMRI) has emerged as a simpler, more rapid MRI approach (fewer scan sequences, no intravenous contrast-media) to reduce costs and facilitate a more widespread clinical implementation. It is unknown how bpMRI and risk models perform conjointly. Therefore, the objective was to develop a predictive model for significant prostate cancer (sPCa) in biopsy-naive men based on bpMRI findings and clinical parameters. METHODS: Eight hundred and seventy-six biopsy-naive men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen, <50 ng/mL; tumour stage,

Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica/métodos , Nomogramas , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/normas , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/normas , Calicreínas/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Periodo Preoperatorio , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estándares de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 1(2): e180219, 2018 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646066

RESUMEN

Importance: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enhances detection and risk stratification for significant prostate cancer but is time-consuming (approximately 40 minutes) and expensive. Rapid and simpler (approximately 15-minute) biparametric MRI (bpMRI) using fewer scan sequences could be implemented as a prostate MRI triage test on a larger scale before performing biopsies. Objectives: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value (NPV) of a novel bpMRI method in biopsy-naive men in detecting and ruling out significant prostate cancer in confirmatory biopsies. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-institutional, paired, prospective cohort study of biopsy-naive men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer from November 1, 2015, to June 15, 2017. Interventions: All patients underwent bpMRI (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging) followed by standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies (all men) and targeted biopsies of men with suspicious bpMRI findings. Main Outcomes and Measures: Suspicion grades of bpMRI, biopsy results, and NPV of bpMRI were evaluated for detection of or ruling out significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥4 + 3 or maximum cancerous core length >50% for Gleason score 3 + 4). We compared the diagnostic performance of standard biopsies in all men vs standard plus targeted (combined) biopsies restricted to men with suspicious bpMRI findings. The reference standard was combined biopsy results from all men. Results: A total of 1020 men were enrolled, with a median age of 67 years (interquartile range, 61-71 years) and a median prostate-specific antigen level of 8.0 ng/mL (interquartile range, 5.7-13.0 ng/mL). Combined biopsies detected any and significant prostate cancer in 655 of 1020 men (64%) and 404 of 1020 men (40%), respectively. Restricting combined biopsies to men with suspicious bpMRI findings meant 305 of 1020 men (30%) with low-suspicious bpMRIs could avoid prostate biopsies (biopsy in 715 men with suspicious bpMRIs vs all 1020 men who required standard biopsies [70%]; P < .001). Significant prostate cancer diagnoses were improved by 11% (396 vs 351 men; P < .001), and insignificant prostate cancer diagnoses were reduced by 40% (173 vs 288 men; P < .001) compared with our current diagnostic standard, standard biopsies alone in all men. The NPV of bpMRI findings in ruling out significant prostate cancer was 97% (95% CI, 95%-99%). Conclusions and Relevance: Low-suspicion bpMRI has a high NPV in ruling out significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men. Using a simple and rapid bpMRI method as a triage test seems to improve risk stratification and may be used to exclude aggressive disease and avoid unnecessary biopsies with its inherent risks. Future studies are needed to fully explore its role in clinical prostate cancer management.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
4.
Acta Radiol ; 59(3): 371-380, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28679325

RESUMEN

Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Purpose To compare mpMRI score subgroups to systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies (TRUSbx) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based findings for detection of csPCa in men undergoing repeat biopsies. Material and Methods MpMRI was performed prior to re-biopsy in 289 prospectively enrolled patients. All underwent repeat TRUSbx followed by targeted biopsies (MRITB) of any mpMRI-identified lesion. MpMRI suspicion grade, PSA level, and density (PSAd) were compared with biopsy results and further matched to the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen if available. Results PCa was detected in 128/289 (44%) patients with median age, PSA, and prior negative TRUSbx of 64 (interquartile range [IQR] = 59-67), 12.0 ng/mL (IQR = 8.3-19.1), and 2 (IQR = 1-3), respectively. TRUSbx detected PCa in 108/289 (37%) patients, of which 49 (45%) had insignificant cancer. MRITB was performed in 271/289 (94%) patients and detected PCa in 96 (35%) with 78 (81%) having csPCa. MpMRI scores showed a high association between suspicion level and biopsy results on both lesion and patient level ( P < 0.001). MpMRI was better than PSA and PSAd ( P < 0.001) to identify patients with missed csPCa. In total, 64/128 (50%) patients underwent RP; 60/64 had csPCa. MpMRI was significantly better in predicting csPCa on RP compared with TRUSbx ( P = 0.019) as MRITB and TRUSbx correctly identified 47/60 (78%) and 35/60 (58%) patients, respectively. Conclusion MpMRI improves detection of missed csPCa and suspicion scores correlate well with biopsy and RP results on both patient and lesion level.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
5.
Urology ; 110: 154-160, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28866023

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify the location of missed significant prostate cancer (sPCa) lesions by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSbx) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy (mpMRIbx) in men undergoing repeat biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 289 men with prior negative TRUSbx underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. The location of any suspicious lesion was registered and scored using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 1 classification according to the likelihood of being sPCa. All patients underwent repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (reTRUSbx) and targeted mpMRIbx (image fusion) of any suspicious lesion. Biopsy results were compared and the locations of missed sPCa lesions were registered. Cancer significance was defined as (1) any core with a Gleason score of >6, (2) cancer core involvement of ≥50% and for reTRUSbx on patient level, and (3) the presence of ≥3 positive cores. RESULTS: Of the 289 patients, prostate cancer was detected in 128 (44%) with 88 (30%) having sPCa. Overall, 165 separate prostate cancer lesions were detected with 100 being sPCa. Of these, mpMRIbx and reTRUSbx detected 90% (90/100) and 68% (68/100), respectively. The majority of sPCa lesions (78%) missed by primary TRUSbx were located either anteriorly or in the apical region. Missed sPCa lesions at repeat biopsy were primarily located anteriorly (84%) for reTRUSbx (n = 27/32) and posterolateral midprostatic (60%) for mpMRIbx (n = 6/10). CONCLUSION: Both TRUSbx and mpMRIbx missed sPCa lesions in specific segments of the prostate. Missed sPCa lesions at repeat biopsy were primarily located anteriorly for TRUSbx and posterolateral midprostatic for mpMRIbx. Localization of these segments may improve biopsy techniques in men undergoing repeat biopsies.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal , Recto , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Urol Int ; 99(4): 384-391, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28651247

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to compare the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies (TRUS-bx) and multiparametric-MRI targeted biopsies (mp-MRI-bx) in a repeat biopsy setting and evaluate the clinical significance following an "MRI-targeted-only" approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with prior negative biopsies underwent prostatic multiparametric-MRI that was scored using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification. All underwent both repeated TRUS-bx and mp-MRI-bx using image fusion of any PI-RADS ≥3 lesion. Biopsy results from TRUS-bx, mp-MRI-bx, and the combination were compared. RESULTS: PCa was detected in 89 out of 206 (43%) patients. Of these, 64 (31%) and 74 (36%) patients were detected using mp-MRI-bx and TRUS-bx, respectively. Overall, mp-MRI-bx detected fewer patients with low-grade (Gleason score [GS] 3 + 3) cancers (14/64 vs. 41/74) and more patients with intermediate/high-grade cancers (GS ≥3 + 4) (50/64 vs. 33/74) using fewer biopsy cores compared with TRUS-bx (p < 0.001). Using an "MRI-targeted-only" approach in men with PI-RADS ≥3 lesions reduced the number of men requiring repeated biopsies by 50%, decreased low-grade cancer diagnoses by 66%, and increased intermediate/high-grade cancer diagnoses by 52%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-targeted biopsies have a high detection rate for significant PCa in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies and preferentially detect intermediate/high-grade compared with low-grade tumors.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dinamarca , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos
7.
Dan Med J ; 64(5)2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28552089

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate whether a short prostate biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI) protocol provides a valuable diagnostic addition for biopsy guidance in biopsy-naive men with a suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A total of 62 biopsy-naive patients referred to a systematic transrectal ultrasound biopsy (TRUS-bx) due to suspicion of PCa were prospectively enrolled. Bp-MRI was performed before biopsy. All lesions were scored according to the modified Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2. All patients underwent TRUS-bx followed by bp-MRI-guided biopsies (bp-MRI-bx) under MRI/TRUS image fusion from any bp-MRI suspicious lesions not obviously targeted by TRUS-bx. RESULTS: PCa was found in 42 (68%) and 32 (52%) patients by TRUS-bx and bp-MRI-bx, respectively. Bp-MRI-bx de-tected PCa in one patient who had been missed by TRUS-bx, and found the highest Gleason score (GS) in 13 (30%) patients leading to an overall GS upgrade in six (14%) patients. Bp-MRI missed nine patients with GS = 6 and two with a GS = 7 (3 + 4), all of whom were diagnosed by TRUS-bx. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of bp-MRI-bx to routine TRUS-bx seems feasible in biopsy-naive patients and may improve the detection of aggressive PCa in first-round biopsies. This pilot study thus provides an incentive for a larger investigation. FUNDING: Costs were covered by the Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, Denmark. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (HEH-2015-054, I-Suite no: 03775) and with the Committee for Health Research Ethics (no. H-15009341).


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dinamarca , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Proyectos Piloto , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Ultrasonografía
8.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 42(2): 446-53, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25408104

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient measurements (ADCtumor and ADCratio ) and the Gleason score from radical prostatectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with clinically localized prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed prior to prostatectomy and mean ADC values from both cancerous (ADCtumor ) and benign (ADCbenign ) tissue were measured to calculate the ADCratio (ADCtumor divided by ADCbenign ). The ADC measurements were correlated with the Gleason score from the prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: The association between ADC measurements and Gleason score showed a significant negative correlation (P < 0.001) with Spearman's rho for ADCtumor (-0.421) and ADCratio (-0.649). There was a statistically significant difference between ADC measurements and the Gleason score for all tumors (P = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 (ADCtumor ) to 0.80 (ADCratio ) in discriminating Gleason score 6 from Gleason score ≥7 tumors. The AUC changed to 0.72 (ADCtumor ) and 0.90 (ADCratio ) when discriminating Gleason score ≤7(3+4) from Gleason score ≥7(4+3). CONCLUSION: ADC measurements showed a significant correlation with tumor Gleason score at final pathology. The ADCratio demonstrated the best correlation compared to the ADCtumor value and radically improved accuracy in discriminating Gleason score ≤7(3+4) from Gleason score ≥7(4+3) tumors.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estadística como Asunto
9.
Scand J Urol ; 49(1): 25-34, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24922550

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies (mp-MRI-bx) in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy (TRUS-bx) sessions without previous experience of this. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-three patients with prior negative TRUS-bx scheduled for repeated biopsies due to persistent suspicion of PCa were prospectively enrolled. mp-MRI was performed before biopsy and all lesions were scored according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert classification. All underwent repeated TRUS-bx (10 cores) and mp-MRI-bx under visual TRUS guidance of any mp-MRI-suspicious lesion not targeted by systematic TRUS-bx. RESULTS: PCa was found in 39 out of 83 patients (47%) and mp-MRI identified at least one lesion with some degree of suspicion in all 39 patients. Both PI-RADS and Likert scoring showed a high correlation between suspicion of malignancy and biopsy results (p < 0.0001). Five patients (13%) had cancer detected only on mp-MRI-bx outside the TRUS-bx areas (p = 0.025) and another seven patients (21%) had an overall Gleason score upgrade of at least one grade based on the mp-MRI-bx. Secondary PCa lesions not visible on mp-MRI were detected by TRUS-bx in six out of 39 PCa patients. The secondary foci were all Gleason 6 (3 + 3) in 5-10% of the biopsy core. According to the Epstein criteria, 37 out of 39 cancer patients were classified as clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Using mp-MRI, even without previous experience, can improve the detection rate of significant PCa at repeated biopsy and allows more accurate Gleason grading.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Próstata/patología , Neoplasia Intraepitelial Prostática/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Calicreínas/sangre , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
10.
Eur Radiol ; 25(6): 1776-85, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25504428

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of preoperative multiparametric MRI with extracapsular extension (ECE) risk-scoring in the assessment of prostate cancer tumour stage (T-stage) and prediction of ECE at final pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with clinically localised prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled. Multiparametric MRI was performed prior to prostatectomy, and evaluated according to the ESUR MR prostate guidelines by two different readers. An MRI clinical T-stage (cTMRI), an ECE risk score, and suspicion of ECE based on tumour characteristics and personal opinion were assigned. Histopathological prostatectomy results were standard reference. RESULTS: Histopathology and cTMRI showed a spearman rho correlation of 0.658 (p < 0.001) and a weighted kappa = 0.585 [CI 0.44;0.73](reader A). ECE was present in 31/87 (36 %) patients. ECE risk-scoring showed an AUC of 0.65-0.86 on ROC-curve for both readers, with sensitivity and specificity of 81 % and 78 % at best cutoff level (reader A), respectively. When tumour characteristics were influenced by personal opinion, the sensitivity and specificity for prediction of ECE changed to 61 %-74 % and 77 %-88 % for the readers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric MRI with ECE risk-scoring is an accurate diagnostic technique in determining prostate cancer clinical tumour stage and ECE at final pathology. KEY POINTS: • Multiparametric MRI is an accurate diagnostic technique for preoperative prostate cancer staging • ECE risk scoring predicts extracapsular tumour extension at final pathology • ECE risk scoring shows an AUC of 0.86 on the ROC-curve • ECE risk scoring shows a moderate inter-reader agreement (K = 0.45) • Multiparametric MRI provides essential knowledge for optimal clinical management.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Vesículas Seminales/patología
11.
Acta Radiol ; 55(6): 761-8, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24056890

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography urography (CTU) is used widely in the work-up of patients with symptoms of urinary tract lesions. Preoperative knowledge of whether a tumor is invasive or non-invasive is important for the choice of surgery. So far there are no studies about the distinction of invasive and non-invasive tumors in ureter and renal pelvis based on the enhancement measured with Hounsfield Units. PURPOSE: To examine the value of CTU using split-bolus technique to distinguish non-invasive from invasive urothelial carcinomas in the upper urinary tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent nephroureterectomy between 2006 and 2011 and who had split-bolus CTU prior to surgery were included. The images were available electronically. The attenuation values before and after administration of iodine-based contrast media were measured. The radiology, patient, and pathology records were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 158 patients who underwent unilateral nephroureterectomy 69 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Histopathological examination revealed 31 patients with non-invasive and 38 with invasive urothelial carcinoma. Neither absolute attenuation nor change in attenuation values obtained at CTU could distinguish between invasive and non-invasive lesions. No patients had a CTU within the last year before the examination that resulted in surgery. CONCLUSION: A split-bolus CTU cannot distinguish between invasive and non-invasive urothelial tumors in the upper urinary tract, but the examination is useful to diagnose a tumor in the renal pelvis and the ureter.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Yopamidol/análogos & derivados , Pelvis Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis Renal/patología , Pelvis Renal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Uréter/diagnóstico por imagen , Uréter/patología , Uréter/cirugía , Neoplasias Ureterales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ureterales/patología , Neoplasias Ureterales/cirugía , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirugía
12.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 175(10): 659-60, 2013 Mar 04.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23462039

RESUMEN

Approximately 95% of testicular cancers are germ-cell tumours and these are divided into non-seminoma and pure seminoma. They rarely metastasize to the gastrointestinal tract (< 5%) and pure seminoma are the least likely to do so with an incidence of < 1%. We describe an unusual case of a 67-year-old man, who presented with gastrointestinal complaints, the first symptoms of testicular seminoma being a small bowel metastasis. The patient had a palpable testicular mass which was not detected until after the tumour in the small bowel had been resected and histology revealed metastasis from a seminoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Intestinales/secundario , Seminoma/patología , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Anciano , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinales/patología , Neoplasias Intestinales/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática/radioterapia , Masculino , Seminoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirugía
13.
Eur J Radiol ; 80(2): 292-6, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20708869

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate diagnostic accuracy of detection of prostate cancer by magnetic resonance: to evaluate the performance of T2WI, DCEMRI and CSI and to correlate the results with biopsy and radical prostatectomy histopathological data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 43 patients, scheduled for radical prostatectomy, underwent prostate MR examination. Prostate cancer was identified by transrectal ultrasonographically (TRUS) guided sextant biopsy. MR examination was performed at 1.5 T with an endorectal MR coil. Cancer localisation was performed on sextant-basis--for comparison between TRUS biopsy, MR techniques and histopathological findings on prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was identified in all 43 patients by combination of the three MR techniques. The detection of prostate cancer on sextant-basis showed sensitivity and specificity: 50% and 91% for TRUS, 72% and 55% for T2WI, 49% and 69% for DCEMRI, and 46% and 78% for CSI. CONCLUSION: T2WI, DCEMRI and CSI in combination can identify prostate cancer. Further development of MR technologies for these MR methods is necessary to improve the detection of the prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biopsia , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Ultrasonografía
14.
Eur J Radiol ; 79(2): 206-10, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20347539

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate unenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of appendicitis or another surgery-requiring condition in an adult population scheduled for emergency appendectomy based on a clinical diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study included 48 consecutive patients (29 female, 19 male, 18-70 years old, mean age=37.1 years). MRI examination was designed to be comfortable and fast; no contrast was administered. The sequences were performed during quiet respiration. The MRI findings were reviewed by two radiologists and one surgeon independent of each other and compared with surgical and pathological records. RESULTS: According to the surgical and histopathological findings 30 of 48 patients (63%) had acute appendicitis. Of the remaining 18 patients, 4 patients had no reasons for the clinical symptoms and 14 patients had other pathology. For the three reviewers the performance of MRI in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis showed the following sensitivity, specificity and accuracy ranges: 83-93%, 50-83% and 77-83%. Moderate (κ=0.51) and fair (κ=0.31) interobserver agreements in the MR diagnosis of acute appendicitis were found between the reviewers. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values for overall performance of MRI in detecting pelvic abnormalities were 100%, 75% (3 of 4 healthy patients were identified by MRI) and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced fast MRI is feasible as an additional fast screening before the appendectomy. It may prevent unnecessary surgeries. The fast MRI examination can be adequately performed on an MRI unit of broad range of field strengths.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
15.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 36(2): 159-61, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15368685

RESUMEN

A 30-year-old woman developed classic symptoms of painful bladder disease and eosinophilic cystitis as an adverse effect of penicillin for abdominal actinomycosis. The symptoms were reversible after stopping penicillin.


Asunto(s)
Cistitis/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/complicaciones , Eosinofilia/etiología , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Actinomicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Cistitis/diagnóstico , Cistitis/patología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Eosinofilia/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Vejiga Urinaria/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...