Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 143(4): 1817-1824, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35099608

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Accuracy of calibration of radiographs significantly influences the quality of digital templating for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The standard of care is calibration with external calibration markers (ECM). This method is associated with significant errors. Dual-scale single marker (DSSM) calibration methods may improve accuracy. The present prospective observational study is the first to analyze the application of a DSSM method in standing pelvis radiographs. METHODS: 100 patients with unilateral THA underwent antero-posterior pelvis radiographs with ECM and DSSM. The hip components were used as reference calibration factor (internal calibration factor; ICM). Absolute differences of calibration factors for ECM and DSSM from ICM were calculated. Absolute relative deviations (ARD) were calculated. Subgroup analysis for sex and WHO BMI category was performed. Furthermore, patients reported subjective comfort for each marker using a 10-point scale and choosing the preferred marker. RESULTS: Maximum magnification factor differences from the ICM were 23.3% and 9.5% and mean absolute differences were 12.5% and 2.1% for the ECM and DSSM, respectively. ARD from ICM was significantly lower for DSSM compared to ECM (p < 0.001). Absolute differences increased with BMI category using ECM; calibration by DSSM was consistent in all subgroups. Patients preferred DSSM over ECM (n = 53) or were indifferent (n = 20). Comfort was rated significantly higher for DSSM versus ECM (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DSSM method showed superior results in comparison to the ECM method for calibration of digital radiographs. DSSM could be used to improve digital templating in standing radiographs.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Calibración , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía
2.
Asian Spine J ; 14(1): 66-71, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352719

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Four orthopedic spine surgeons measured the radiological parameters of pedicle screws in the cervical spine using a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. PURPOSE: This study analyzed the insertion angle of CT-navigated insertion of pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine and classified them according to their position. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Overall, a pedicle transverse angle of 33.6°-50.2° with a mean angle of 45° relative to the midline has been reported in the literature. METHODS: The insertion angles of 87 pedicle screws inserted using CT-based navigation in the subaxial cervical spine were measured in the postoperative CT. The screw positioning was determined according to the modified Gertzbein and Robbins classification. RESULTS: Total 89.3% (n=78) of the pedicle screws inserted using CT-based navigation showed good placement. The mean insertion angle of the pedicle screws that showed good positioning was 29.9°±9.9°. The pedicle screws showing bad positioning had a mean insertion angle of 26.8°±10.5° (p=0.157). The interobserver reliability showed a reliable measurement intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.994 (95% confidence interval, 0.992-0.996). CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that the insertion angle of the pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine was smaller than the actual pedicle transverse angle, as per the literature. One reason for this discrepancy could be that the navigation systems allow the insertion of cervical pedicle screws with a lower convergence.

3.
Gastric Cancer ; 18(1): 193-9, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24522716

RESUMEN

In 2012 the European Union Network of Excellence on gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer (EUNE) held its third conference in Cologne, Germany. The main themes discussed included translational research, standard and audit, early diagnosis, development of surgical treatment, adequate surgery for EGJ cancer, adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment, prevention of peritoneal carcinomatosis and finally education and training. The meeting was attended by 150 experts from 18 different countries.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Terapia Combinada , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Unión Europea , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA