The efficacy of dyadic interventions for community-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Most people with dementia live at home and depend on informal caregivers for care. Both caregivers and persons with dementia can experience negative psychological and behavioural effects as the disease progresses. Non-pharmacological interventions can alleviate these effects and dyadic interventions, involving both caregiver and person with dementia, may be particularly effective. In this systematic review, the effect of dyadic interventions involving community-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers was researched. This article is an update of a review of dyadic interventions up to 2012 (Van't Leven et al., 2013). Twenty-two randomized controlled trials published between January 2012 and March 2023 met eligibility criteria, representing 3857 dyads. Results of a meta-analysis showed no overall intervention effect. Thirteen studies reported positive intervention effects, 9 studies reported no intervention effects. Intervention content and participant characteristics and knowledge of the disease varied widely between the studies reviewed. Effective interventions were those that matched activities for the person with dementia to their interests and abilities and educating the caregiver about dementia and communication. Interventions of moderate length (3-4 months) tended to be more effective than longer or shorter interventions. Future studies should further explore the factors contributing to the effects of dyadic interventions.

The effectiveness and health-economic evaluation of "Partner in Balance," a blended self-management program for early-stage dementia caregivers: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of people with dementia are crucial in dementia care. However, they are insufficiently supported and report caregiver burdens, which urges the need for cost-effective interventions aimed at supporting caregivers. This paper presents the design of a study evaluating the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility of a blended self-management program for early-stage dementia caregivers. METHODS/DESIGN: A pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial with a shared control group will be conducted. Participants will be informal caregivers of people with early-stage dementia and will be recruited by local care professionals. Randomization will be carried out at the level of the care professional level in a ratio of 35% to 65% (control arm vs. intervention arm). Participants in the control arm will receive care as usual and the intervention arm will receive the blended care self-management program "Partner in Balance" within a usual care setting in the Netherlands. Data will be collected at baseline and at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups. The primary outcome for effectiveness (part 1) is care management self-efficacy. For the health-economic evaluation (part 2) total care costs and the quality of life for individuals with dementia (cost-effectiveness) and quality-adjusted life years (cost-utility) will be the base case analysis. Secondary outcomes (parts 1 and 2) will include depression, anxiety, perceived informal caregiving stress, service-use self-efficacy, quality of life, caregivers' gain, and perseverance time. A process evaluation (part 3) will investigate the internal and external validity of the intervention. DISCUSSION: In this trial, we plan to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility of "Partner in Balance" among informal caregivers of people with dementia. We expect to find a significant increase in care management self-efficacy, and the program to be cost-effective, and provide valuable insights to stakeholders of "Partner in Balance." TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05450146. Registered on 4 November 2022.