Visits to primary care physicians among persons who inject drugs at high risk of hepatitis C virus infection: room for improvement.

The role of primary care physicians (PCP) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevention is increasingly emphasized. Yet, little is known about the patterns of contacts with PCP among persons who inject drugs (PWID). We sought to assess the 6-month prevalence of PCP visiting among PWID at risk of HCV infection and to explore the associated factors. Baseline data were collected from HCV-seronegative PWID recruited in HEPCO, an observational Hepatitis Cohort study (2004-2011) in Montreal, Canada. An interviewer-administered questionnaire elicited information on socio-demographic factors, drug use patterns and healthcare services utilization. Blood samples were tested for HCV antibodies. Using the Gelberg-Andersen Behavioral Model, hierarchical logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predisposing, need and enabling factors associated with PCP visiting. Of the 349 participants (mean age = 34; 80.8% male), 32.1% reported visiting a PCP. In the multivariate model, among predisposing factors, male gender [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.45 (0.25-0.83)], chronic homelessness [AOR = 0.08 (0.01-0.67)], cocaine injection [AOR = 0.46 (0.28-0.76)] and reporting greater illegal or semi-legal income [AOR = 0.48 (0.27-0.85)] were negatively associated with PCP visits. Markers of need were not associated with the outcome. Among enabling factors, contact with street nurses [AOR = 3.86 (1.49-9.90)] and food banks [AOR = 2.01 (1.20-3.37)] was positively associated with PCP visiting. Only one third of participating PWID reported a recent visit to a PCP. While a host of predisposing factors seems to hamper timely contacts with PCP among high-risk PWID, community-based support services may play an important role in initiating dialogue with primary healthcare services in this population.

[The use of head CT scan in adult trauma victims: an algorithm]. / Le scanner cérébral chez les adultes victimes de traumatismes crâniens mineurs: un arbre décisionnel.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to identify, through recursive partitioning, clinically relevant criteria which predict the need for acute neurosurgical intervention in a group of patients with mild head injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of all adult patients, from April 2000 to March 2001, who sustained a blunt trauma and underwent head CT scan, was reviewed. The following inclusion criteria for mild head injury were used: initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ranging from 13 to 15; no loss of consciousness lasting more than one hour; no obvious skull fracture; a cranial CT scan performed. We collected demographic and trauma related data, interventions and outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken. In parallel, recursive partitioning was carried out using all variables to elaborate a decision algorithm. RESULTS: There were 405 patients in the sample. CT identified lesions in 12% of patients. Twelve patients (3%) required acute neurosurgical intervention. The recursive partitioning analysis identified three significant sequential nodes: deterioration of the GCS; an initial GCS of 13 vs 14 or 15; and the presence of associated injuries or comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: A simple three step rule predicts the need for acute neurosurgical intervention based on clinical findings: a deteriorating GCS; an initial GCS of 13; and the presence of associated injuries or comorbid conditions.