Comparison of Cabozantinib and Axitinib as Second-line Therapy After Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Retrospective Real-world Data.

BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have compared the treatment outcomes of second-line therapies in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of cabozantinib and axitinib as second-line treatments in patients with metastatic ccRCC who previously received immune-oncology combination therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic ccRCC treated with cabozantinib and axitinib as second-line therapy after nivolumab-ipilimumab treatment were identified among 243 patients with RCC treated between August 1, 2018 and January 31, 2022 at 34 institutions belonging to the Japanese Urological Oncology Group. Patients were assessed for treatment outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and incidence rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients treated with cabozantinib and 60 treated with axitinib as second-line therapy after nivolumab-ipilimumab treatment for metastatic ccRCC were identified. The median PFS (95% confidence interval) was 11.0 months (9.0-16.0) with cabozantinib and 9.5 months (6.0-13.0) with axitinib. The ORRs were 37.5% (cabozantinib) and 38.3% (axitinib). The rates of any-grade AEs and grade ≥3 AEs were 79.2% (cabozantinib) versus 63.3% (axitinib; P = .091) and 35.4% (cabozantinib) versus 23.3% (axitinib; P = .202), respectively. In the poor-risk group, PFS was longer in the cabozantinib group than in the axitinib group (P = .033). CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of cabozantinib and axitinib were comparable. In the poor-risk group, cabozantinib was more effective than axitinib. These findings provide valuable insights into the selection of second-line treatment options after nivolumab-ipilimumab treatment in patients with metastatic ccRCC.

Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men on Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Japan.

Background and Objectives: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer has greatly improved treatment outcomes. As patient survival rates have increased, reports of decreased bone density and increased bone fractures as side effects of ADT have emerged. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Japanese men was 4.6%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of osteoporosis treatment in prostate cancer patients who underwent ADT in Japan. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 33 male patients who had undergone ADT for prostate cancer, who were noted to have decreased bone density. Mean age was 76.2 ± 7.7 years (64-87). Medications included vitamin D in one case, bisphosphonates (BP) in 27 cases, and denosumab in five cases. The evaluation method examined the rate of change in bone mineral density (BMD) before osteoporosis treatment and 1 year after. For comparison, a group without osteoporosis treatment intervention (n = 33) was selected, and matched for prostate cancer treatment and age. The rate of change in trabecular bone score (TBS) was also calculated. Results: The percentage changes in BMD before and 1 year after treatment were as follows: lumbar spine, 7.1 ± 5.8% in the treatment group versus -3.9 ± 4.1% in the no treatment group; femoral neck, 5.5 ± 6.2% in the treatment group versus -0.9 ± 3.9% in the no treatment group; total femur, 6.6 ± 6.4% in the treatment group versus the no treatment group which was -1.7 ± 3.2%. In all cases, there was a clear significant difference (p < 0.01). The percent change in TBS was further calculated in the same manner. There was no significant difference between the two groups: +1.7 ± 3.8% in the treated group versus +0.3 ± 4.1% in the untreated group. Conclusions: Osteoporosis treatment in Japanese patients with prostate cancer on ADT therapy was found to significantly increase BMD compared to the untreated group. BP and denosumab were found to be very effective in increasing BMD.

Therapeutic outcome of combination therapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to clarify the therapeutic outcome of combination therapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). METHODS: We have been retrospectively investigating the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in 36 patients with metastatic nccRCC undergoing combination therapy using two ICIs, ipilimumab plus nivolumab (ICI-ICI), and ICI plus TKI (ICI-TKI), at Kobe University and affiliated institutions since 2018. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse event (AE) were compared. RESULTS: The first-line regimens was ICI-ICI regimens in 26 cases and ICI-TKI regimens in 10 cases. The ORRs in the ICI-ICI and ICI-TKI groups were 34.6 and 30.0%, respectively (p=0.9433). The 50% PFS for the ICI-TKI group was 9.7 months, significantly longer than that for the ICI-ICI group (4.6 months, p=0.0499), and there was no significant difference in OS between them (p=0.3984). There was no significant difference in the occurrence rate of AE for below grade 2 (p=0.8535) nor above grade 3 (p=0.3786) between the ICI-ICI and ICITKI groups. CONCLUSIONS: From our analysis of real-world data, a better outcome of PFS was expected in the ICI-TKI group compared with that in the ICI-ICI group, while there was no significant difference in OS or ORR.

Prognostic outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitor following first-line immune-oncology combination therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the prognostic outcomes in mRCC patients receiving second-line TKI following first-line IO combination therapy. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 243 mRCC patients receiving second-line TKI after first-line IO combination therapy: nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 189, IO-IO group) and either pembrolizumab plus axitinib or avelumab plus axitinib (n = 54, IO-TKI group). Oncological outcomes between the two groups were compared, and prognostication systems were developed for these patients. RESULTS: In the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, the objective response rates to second-line TKI were 34.4% and 25.9% (p = 0.26), the median PFS periods were 9.7 and 7.1 months (p = 0.79), and the median OS periods after the introduction of second-line TKI were 23.1 and 33.5 months (p = 0.93), respectively. Among the several factors examined, non-CCRCC, high CRP, and low albumin levels were identified as independent predictors of both poor PFS and OS by multivariate analyses. It was possible to precisely classify the patients into 3 risk groups regarding both PFS and OS according to the positive numbers of the independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, the c-indices of this study were superior to those of previous systems as follows: 0.75, 0.64, and 0.61 for PFS prediction and 0.76, 0.70, and 0.65 for OS prediction by the present, IMDC, and MSKCC systems, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the prognostic outcomes after introducing second-line TKI between the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, and the histopathology, CRP and albumin levels had independent impacts on the prognosis in mRCC patients receiving second-line TKI, irrespective of first-line IO combination therapies.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the management of lower pole ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a patient with an incomplete duplicated collecting system.

Introduction: The performance of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty has recently been increasing in frequency. However, patients with duplicated renal pelvises and ureters can present challenges. Case presentation: A 71-year-old woman presented with flank pain and was diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction with an incomplete duplicated collecting system. Preoperative imaging did not reveal the details of the stenosis. Therefore, three reconstructive procedures were prepared: The Anderson-Hynes procedure, end-to-side pyeloureterostomy, and upper pole ureter to lower pole pyeloplasty with the Anderson-Hynes procedure for the lower pole. These procedures were determined by the length of the intact ureter and the presence of crossed vessels. During the surgery, the crossing vein was severed, allowing successful reconstruction with Anderson-Hynes anastomosis. Conclusion: Preoperative evaluation and preparation of multiple surgical techniques are crucial in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for incomplete duplicated collecting systems.

The impact of primary region resection on the therapeutic outcome of combination regimens for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The present study aimed to clarify the relationship between the therapeutic outcome of combination regimens, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The present study retrospectively assessed the association between treatment efficacy and prognosis with or without CN, and the timing of CN in 151 patients treated with combination regimens for mRCC who were categorized as intermediate/poor risk. The first-line regimens included the ICI-ICI and ICI-TKI regimens in 98 and 53 cases, respectively. In patients with recurrence after radical surgery (n=66), the 50% PFS times of the ICI-ICI and the ICI-TKI groups were 33.6 months and not reached (NR) (P=0.4032), respectively, and the 50% OS times were 53.7 months and NR (P=0.6886), respectively. Among the 38 patients with metastasis from the initial diagnosis who underwent upfront CN, the 50% PFS times of the ICI-ICI and the ICI-TKI groups were 10.5 and 8.2 months (P=0.5806), respectively, and the 50% OS times were NR and 15.8 months (P=0.0587), respectively. Among the 51 patients who did not receive upfront CN, the 50% PFS time of the ICI-TKI group was significantly higher than that in the ICI-ICI group (4.1 months and NR, respectively; P=0.0210), and the 50% OS times were 29.8 months and NR (P=0.7343), respectively. In conclusion, according to the analysis of real-world data, good therapeutic efficacy can be achieved with any regimen in patients with recurrence after radical surgery. In addition, improved results could be achieved through treatment with ICI-TKI in patients without upfront CN.

Real-world analysis of metastatic prostate cancer demonstrates increased frequency of PSA-imaging discordance with visceral metastases and upfront ARAT/docetaxel therapy.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the background and treatment course of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC), with a particular focus on radiographic progression in the absence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. METHODS: The study population consisted of 229 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (HSPC), who received prostate biopsy and androgen deprivation therapy at Kobe University Hospital between January 2008 and June 2022. Clinical characteristics were retrospectively evaluated using medical records. PSA progression-free status was defined as ≤1.05 times greater than that from 3 months before. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify parameters associated with time to progression on imaging without PSA elevation. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients with metastatic HSPC without neuroendocrine PC were identified. The median follow-up period was 38.0 months, with a median overall survival of 94.9 months. Six patients exhibited disease progression on imaging without PSA elevation during HSPC treatment, three during first-line castration-resistant PC (CRPC) treatment, and two during late-line CRPC treatment. The rate of disease progression without PSA elevation at 3 years after treatment initiation was 7.4%. Multivariate analysis revealed that organ metastases and upfront treatment with docetaxel or androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy were independent prognostic factors for imaging progression without PSA elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Disease progression on imaging without PSA elevation occurred not only during HSPC treatment and first-line CRPC treatment, but also during late-line CRPC treatment. Patients with visceral metastases or those treated with upfront androgen receptor axis-targeted or docetaxel may be more prone to such progression.

The poor antitumor effect of pembrolizumab in advanced upper urothelial carcinoma with renal parenchymal invasion.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated poor prognosticators in advanced or unresectable urothelial carcinoma, focusing on renal parenchymal invasion (RPI). METHODS: This study included 48 bladder cancer (BC) and 67 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with pembrolizumab from December 2017 to September 2022 at Kobe University Hospital. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for clinical characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model to identify parameters associated with either PFS or OS. RESULTS: Of 67 UTUC patients, 23 had RPI and 41 patients did not, while 3 cases could not be evaluated. Patients with RPI were predominantly elderly and had liver metastases. ORR for patients with RPI was 8.7%, while it was 19.5% for those without RPI. PFS was significantly shorter for patients with RPI compared with those without RPI. Patients with RPI had significantly shorter OS than those without RPI. On multivariate analysis, performance status (PS) ≥ 2, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3, C-reactive protein ≥0.3 mg/dL and RPI were independent prognostic factors for PFS. PS ≥ 2, NLR ≥ 3, visceral metastasis and RPI were independent prognostic factors for OS. UTUC patient OS was significantly shorter than BC patient OS, while no significant difference in PFS or OS was observed between BC patients and UTUC patients without RPI. CONCLUSIONS: RPI was a poor prognostic factor in advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab, possibly resulting in a poorer prognosis for UTUC compared with BC.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab and axitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Real-world experience in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes following combined treatment with pembrolizumab and axitinib as first-line therapy for patients with advanced RCC. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 47 consecutive Japanese patients who were diagnosed with advanced RCC and subsequently received pembrolizumab and axitinib between February 2020 and January 2022. Efficacy and safety of this combined therapy in these patients were comprehensively investigated. RESULTS: The 47 included patients were classified into the following 3 groups by the IMDC system: favorable, 7 (14.9%); intermediate, 24 (51.1%) and poor, 16 (34.0%). Responses to this combined therapy in the 47 patients were as follows: CR, 8 (17.0%); PR, 20 (42.6%); SD, 16 (34.0%) and PD, 3 (6.4%); thus, the ORR was 59.6%. During the observation period, disease progression and death occurred in 19 (40.4%) and 9 (19.1%) patients, respectively, and the median PFS and OS were 18 months and not reached, respectively. Univariate analyses identified the following significant predictors for poor prognostic outcomes: lack of nephrectomy, liver metastasis, bone metastasis, elevated CRP and IMDC poor risk for PFS; and lack of nephrectomy, non-CCC and elevated CRP for OS. AEs and those corresponding to grade ≥ 3 occurred in all (100%) and 30 (63.8%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on real-world outcomes following pembrolizumab and axitinib for treatment-naïve advanced Japanese RCC patients, which showed the efficacy and safety of this combined therapy being similar or even superior to those in clinical trial.

An oral cancer vaccine using Bifidobacterium vector augments combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies in mouse renal cell carcinoma model.

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based combination therapies, including anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab with anti-CTLA-4 antibody, and ipilimumab have become the primary treatment option for metastatic or unresectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, despite the combination of two ICIs, 60-70% of patients are still resistant to first-line cancer immunotherapy. In the present study, undertook combination immunotherapy for RCC using an oral cancer vaccine (Bifidobacterium longum displaying WT1 tumor associated antigen (B. longum 420)) with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies in a mouse syngeneic model of RCC to explore possible synergistic effects. We found that B. longum 420 significantly improved the survival of mice bearing RCC tumors treated by anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies compared to the mice treated by the antibodies alone. This result suggests that B. longum 420 oral cancer vaccine as an adjunct to ICIs could provide a novel treatment option for RCC patients. Our microbiome analysis revealed that the proportion of Lactobacilli was significantly increased by B. longum 420. Although the detailed mechanism of action is unknown, it is possible that microbiome alteration by B. longum 420 enhances the efficacy of the ICIs.

Impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to combination therapy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been suggested in the real-world setting. We retrospectively examined the efficacy of CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab systemic therapy for synchronous mRCC. METHODS: Synchronous mRCC patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab at Kobe University Hospital or five affiliated hospitals between October 2018 and December 2021 were included in this study. We compared the outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) between patients with CN prior to systemic therapy and without CN. In addition, patients were 1:1 matched by propensity scores accounting for factors associated with treatment assignment. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Prior CN) and 33 received nivolumab plus ipilimumab alone (Without CN). PFS of the Prior CN group was 10.8 months (95%CI 5.5-NR) and 3.4 months (95%CI 2.0-5.9) for the Without CN group (p = 0.0158). OS of Prior CN was 38.4 months (95%CI NR-NR) and 12.6 months (95%CI 4.2-30.8) for Without CN (p = 0.0024). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified prior CN as a significant prognostic indicator for PFS and OS. Moreover, propensity score matching analysis showed significant improvements in PFS and OS in Prior CN. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab systemic therapy for synchronous mRCC had a better prognosis than patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab alone. These results suggest the efficacy of prior CN for synchronous mRCC with ICI combination therapy.

Avelumab plus Axitinib for the Treatment of Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Dialysis: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review.

Combination therapies of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and a molecular targeted agent are widely accepted as an appropriate initial systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but there is little published evidence regarding the efficacy of this approach in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Here, we report three patients who were undergoing hemodialysis for ESRD whose metastatic RCC was successfully treated using avelumab plus axitinib. The patients were a 67-year-old man with swollen lymph nodes, a 65-year-old man with pleural dissemination, and a 71-year-old man with lung nodules and an infra-diaphragmatic nodule. They were administered a combination of avelumab plus axitinib as their initial systemic therapy following definitive surgical therapy. The best response of three patients was graded as partial response. No severe adverse events were identified. This is the first report of the use of combination therapy consisting of avelumab plus axitinib in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. We found that this combination was useful in such patients.

Treatment outcome after sequential chemotherapy with cisplatin-etoposide, amrubicin and nogitecan in patients with treatment-related pure small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with histologically diagnosed treatment-related pure small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data for 13 patients with treatment-related neuroendocrine prostate cancer who were diagnosed between May 2015 and February 2022. Standardized systemic therapies of etoposide plus cisplatin (or carboplatin), amrubicin and nogitecan were selected as sequential treatments. Cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival were evaluated as the primary endpoint. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationships between treatment regimens, clinical variables, cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median cancer-specific survival after diagnosis for all patients was 22.4 months (range 1.3-33.4 months). The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months after first-line etoposide plus cisplatin (or carboplatin) treatment (n = 13); 4.2 months after second-line amrubicin treatment (n = 4); and >15 months after third-line nogitecan treatment (n = 2). The median progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy of the liver metastasis (-) group was 10.2 months, and that of the (+) group was 5.3 months (P = 0.015, hazard ratio = 11.6, 95% confidence interval = 1.01 - 133.7). No clinicopathological parameters were identified as significant independent predictors of cancer-specific survival in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Sequential chemotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin (or carboplatin), amrubicin and nogitecan may be helpful for patients with treatment-related pure small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Early biopsy of metastases and initiation of effective therapy is essential for patients with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer and low prostate-specific antigen.

Prognostic Value of Serum Soluble PD-L1 in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Nivolumab.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Increasing availability of effective treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has highlighted the importance of identifying predictors of treatment response. Although PD-L1 expression in renal cancer has been reported as a predictor of treatment response and prognosis, its assessment by immunohistochemistry is invasive and difficult to perform repeatedly. Soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) has recently been proposed as a predictive biomarker for several tumour types. Therefore, we evaluated sPD-L1 levels in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab and investigated its association with treatment response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective single-arm study in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab as second line or later therapy. We measured serum sPD-L1 before and during treatment, classified patients based on baseline values (sPDL1 ≥0.23 ng/ml vs. <0.23 ng/ml) and compared outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with mRCC were included in this study, with 17 (39.5%) classified as low sPD-L1 and 26 (60.5%) as high sPD-L1. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score was significantly poorer in the high sPD-L1 group. The objective response rate was significantly higher (41.2% vs. 7.7%) and overall survival significantly longer (p=0.0323) in the low group compared to the high group. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study findings indicate that sPD-L1 might be a predictor of treatment response to nivolumab in patients with mRCC.

Association between sarcopenia based on psoas muscle index and the response to nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Two methods are used to identify sarcopenia by calculating skeletal muscle area on computed tomography: the skeletal muscle index (SMI) and the psoas muscle index (PMI). Programmed death (PD)-1 inhibitors are helpful in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, there remains insufficient information regarding a clear and easy-to-use biomarker for predicting the response to PD-1 inhibitors in patients with mRCC. Therefore, we investigated the influence of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in patients with mRCC undergoing treatment with nivolumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study evaluated 96 patients with RCC who received nivolumab. The SMI and PMI were calculated for each patient and normalized for stature by use of the following formulas: SMI (cm²/m²)=([skeletal muscle cross-sectional area at the level of L3]/[height]²) and PMI (cm²/m²) = ([left-right sum of the psoas muscle areas at the level of L3]/[height]²). The relationship of the clinical variables with progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: According to the SMI-based definition of sarcopenia, 74.0% of patients had sarcopenia. However, according to the PMI-based definition of sarcopenia, only 34.3% of patients were diagnosed with sarcopenia. Multivariate analysis identified sarcopenia based on PMI (hazard ratio [HR], 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-7.26; p<0.001) and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium poor risk status (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.03-3.50; p=0.041) as significant and independent prognostic factors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: PMI-based sarcopenia is a significant prognostic factor for OS in patients with RCC who receive nivolumab therapy.

Efficacy of preoperative cine magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of adhesion of renal cancer thrombus to inferior vena cava wall.

OBJECTIVE: In renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus, adhesion to, or invasion into, the IVC wall will often increase the level of surgical difficulty and even necessitate resection of the IVC. It will generally be difficult to perform an accurate preoperative assessment using the standard imaging modalities of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cine MRI is an MRI sequence that captures motion to produce detailed information on both the anatomy and the dynamic motion. In the present study, we evaluated the accuracy of preoperative cine MRI for determining the need for IVC wall resection, with validation of the imaging findings according to the intraoperative findings. METHODS: A total of 15 patients who had undergone radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy from May 2018 to April 2020 met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome of interest was the need for IVC resection because of adhesion or invasion of a venous tumor thrombus. Cine MRI was used to evaluate the blood flow between the tumor thrombus and the IVC wall and the presence of tumor thrombus mobility during free respiration. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for preoperative cine MRI for determining the need for IVC wall resection. The Fisher exact test was used to determine the association between intraoperative IVC wall resection and the cine MRI findings. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve were used to compare the accuracy of conventional MRI and cine MRI. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients, 8 (53.3%) had undergone IVC resection. We found that the absence of both dynamic blood flow and tumor thrombus mobility on cine MRI could reliably predict for IVC resection with 100% (95% confidence interval, 51.8%-100%) sensitivity and 85.7% (95% confidence interval, 42.1%-1.00%) specificity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.821 for conventional MRI and 0.929 for cine MRI. CONCLUSIONS: In the preoperative setting, cine MRI could be a helpful examination modality to predict for the need for IVC wall resection for patients with renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus.

Comparative Efficacy of Combination Therapy of Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab for Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is unclear. Our purpose was to evaluate the real-world survival benefit of ipilimumab plus nivolumab retrospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 33 patients with metastatic nccRCC who received combination therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab or monotherapy with a molecular targeted agent as initial systemic therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Median PFS of each therapy was 3.5 and 4.7 months (p=0.61) and median OS was 19.6 and 10.6 months (p=0.23), respectively. Three patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab had a complete response, resulting in an objective response rate of 30.0%, while that for molecular targeted therapy was 4.5% (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab achieved statistically non-significant, but longer overall survival and significantly higher objective response rate.

Comparison of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex (RENAL scores ≥10) and non-complex renal tumors: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: To compare functional and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex tumors with RENAL scores ≥10 and non-complex tumors at a single academic institution. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of all patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at Kobe University Hospital (Kobe, Hyogo, Japan) from 2011 to 2020. Functional and surgical outcomes for complex tumors (RENAL score ≥10) were compared with those of patients with non-complex tumors (RENAL <10). Outcomes analyzed included blood loss, warm ischemia time, console time, perioperative complications, and preoperative and postoperative renal function. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients were included in our present study, with a median follow-up time of 35.1 months. Of these, 299 patients (85.9%) had non-complex tumors and 49 patients (14.1%) had complex tumors. Warm ischemia time and console time were significantly longer in the complex tumors group. Major perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification system ≥3) were significantly more frequent in the complex tumors group than the non-complex tumor group (16.3% vs 5.7%, P = 0.018). Postoperative preservation of estimated glomerular filtration rate and percentage of chronic kidney disease upstage by 1 year were significantly inferior in the complex tumors group. The positive surgical margin rate was 0% and 0.3% in the complex and non-complex tumor groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors is safe, with no difference in oncological outcomes, although more postoperative complications and decreased renal function can be observed than non-complex tumors.

Treatment outcomes of molecular targeted therapy following nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of molecular targeted therapies following nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and to examine the relationship between therapeutic efficacy and the specific molecular targeted therapy used. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 115 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who were treated with nivolumab at our institution and five affiliated hospitals. Among them, 52 patients who received subsequent molecular targeted therapy following nivolumab were selected to survey treatment outcomes. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and differences were analyzed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Among the 52 eligible patients, 40 (76.9%) were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and 12 (23.1%) were treated with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor. The median time to treatment failure and progression-free survival of subsequent molecular targeted therapy were 5.6 and 8.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival from the initiation of first-line therapy was not reached. The disease control rate of subsequent molecular targeted therapy was 69.2% (partial response: 25.0%, stable disease: 44.2%). The median progression-free survival of subsequent tyrosine kinase inhibitor and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor were 9.2 and 8.0 months, respectively (P = 0.37). The progression-free survival of patients whose best response to prior nivolumab was either progressive disease or stable disease/partial response were 6.3 and 11.3 months, respectively (P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular targeted therapies following nivolumab had comparatively better therapeutic efficacy, which was confirmed regardless of the type of molecular targeted agent used.