Hamstring spasticity assessment: does the hip flexion angle impact outcomes?

PURPOSE: Hamstring spasticity is prevalent following neurological injury. The standardized assessment involves passive knee extension, in a position of 90° hip flexion. This creates passive insufficiency of the muscle and lacks ecological validity for walking, whereby the hip typically flexes to a maximum of 40° during swing phase, while the knee extends. This study compared assessment outcomes when completed in 40° and 90° hip flexion. METHODS: The Modified Ashworth Scale and Modified Tardieu Scale, were performed on 35 adults with a neurological condition. Each participant was assessed by three assessors, resulting in 105 trials at 40° and 90°. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the proportion of trials rated as spastic using the Modified Ashworth Scale (p=.012, phi=.27), and Modified Tardieu Scale (p<.001, phi=.36), and the severity of spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (p<.001, effect size (ES)=.50), and Modified Tardieu Scale (p<.001 ES=.47), at 90° hip flexion. The angle of reaction occurred 32° earlier at 90° hip flexion (p<.001, ES = 1.61). CONCLUSIONS: Completing hamstring assessments in 40° hip flexion may reduce the passive insufficiency and improve the ecological validity of assessment, for walking. This may assist in the selection of patients requiring intervention, when their goal relates to walking.

The position of the hip joint impacts hamstring spasticity assessment outcomes, regardless of the clinical outcome measure chosenThe application of bedside assessment methods in a manner reflective of functional tasks may assist in selecting individuals who require active spasticity interventionAs per international guidelines, the use of validated outcome measures in a goal directed and patient centered manner is required to maximize patient care.

Controlling modified Tardieu scale assessment speeds to match joint angular velocities during walking impacts spasticity assessment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether tailoring the speed of the Modified Tardieu Scale to reflect an individual's joint angular velocity during walking influences spasticity assessment outcomes. DESIGN: Observational trial. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient neurological hospital department. SUBJECTS: Ninety adults with lower-limb spasticity. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN MEASURES: The Modified Tardieu Scale was used to assess the gastrocnemius, soleus, hamstrings and quadriceps. The V1 (slow) and V3 (fast) movements were completed as per standardised testing. Two additional assessments were completed, reflecting joint angular velocities during walking based on (i) a healthy control database (controlled velocity) and (ii) the individual's real-time joint angular velocities during walking (matched velocity). The agreement was compared using Cohen's and Weighted Kappa statistics, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: There was poor agreement when rating trials as spastic or not spastic at the ankle joint (Cohen's Kappa = 0.01-0.17). Trials were classified as spastic during V3 and not spastic during the controlled conditions in 81.6-85.1% of trials when compared to stance phase dorsiflexion angular velocities and 48.0-56.4% when compared to swing phase dorsiflexion angular velocities. The severity of muscle reaction demonstrated poor agreement at the ankle (Weighted Kappa = 0.01-0.28). At the knee, there was a moderate-excellent agreement between the V3 and controlled conditions when rating a trial as spastic or not spastic (Cohen's Kappa = 0.66-0.84) and excellent agreement when comparing severity (Weighted Kappa = 0.73-0.94). CONCLUSION: The speed of assessment impacted spasticity outcomes. It is possible that the standardised protocol may overestimate the impact spasticity has on walking, especially at the ankle.

Inertia Sensors for Measuring Spasticity of the Ankle Plantarflexors Using the Modified Tardieu Scale-A Proof of Concept Study.

Ankle spasticity is clinically assessed using goniometry to measure the angle of muscle reaction during the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS). The precision of the goniometric method is questionable as the measured angle may not represent when the spastic muscle reaction occurred. This work proposes a method to accurately determine the angle of muscle reaction during the MTS assessment by measuring the maximum angular velocity and the corresponding ankle joint angle, using two affordable inertial sensors. Initially we identified the association between muscle onset and peak joint angular velocity using surface electromyography and an inertial sensor. The maximum foot angular velocity occurred 0.049 and 0.032 s following the spastic muscle reaction for Gastrocnemius and Soleus, respectively. Next, we explored the use of two affordable inertial sensors to identify the angle of muscle reaction using the peak ankle angular velocity. The angle of muscle reaction and the maximum dorsiflexion angle were significantly different for both Gastrocnemius and Soleus MTS tests (p = 0.028 and p = 0.009, respectively), indicating that the system is able to accurately detect a spastic muscle response before the end of the movement. This work successfully demonstrates how wearable technology can be used in a clinical setting to identify the onset of muscle spasticity and proposes a more accurate method that clinicians can use to measure the angle of muscle reaction during the MTS assessment. Furthermore, the proposed method may provide an opportunity to monitor the degree of spasticity where the direct help of experienced therapists is inaccessible, e.g., in rural or remote areas.

Association of Lower Limb Focal Spasticity With Kinematic Variables During Walking in Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Focal muscle spasticity is defined as spasticity that affects a localized group of muscles. It is prevalent in many adult-onset neurological conditions, yet the relationship of focal muscle spasticity with walking remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship of focal muscle spasticity with the kinematics of walking in traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Ninety-one participants with TBI underwent clinical gait analysis and assessment of focal lower limb muscle spasticity in a prospective cross-sectional study. A matched group of 25 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited to establish a reference dataset. Kinematic data for each person with and without focal muscle spasticity following TBI were compared with the HC cohort at a matched walking speed. RESULTS: The TBI and HC cohorts were well matched. Only those with focal hamstring muscle spasticity walked significantly different to those without. They had significantly greater knee flexion (23.4° compared with 10.5°, P < 0.01) at initial contact. There were no other significant differences in kinematic variables between those with and without focal muscle spasticity. There was no significant association between focal muscle spasticity and walking speed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Focal muscle spasticity and abnormal kinematics whilst walking were common in this cohort of people with TBI. However, focal muscle spasticity had little relationship with kinematic variables, and no significant relationship with walking speed. This finding has implications for the treatment of focal muscle spasticity to improve walking following TBI. Focal muscle spasticity had little relationship with kinematic variables and walking speed in this cohort of people with TBI who could walk without assistance.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A381).

Ankle Power Generation Has a Greater Influence on Walking Speed Reserve Than Balance Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: Reduced walking speed is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Walking speed reserve (WSR) refers to the ability to increase walking speed on demand and is calculated as the difference between self-selected and fast walking speeds. Walking speed reserve is important for adaptive functional mobility in the community. Predictors of WSR following TBI are yet to be determined. The aim of the study was to identify whether static balance or ankle power generation (APG) was a stronger predictor of WSR following TBI. SETTING: A major metropolitan rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 92 individuals receiving inpatient physiotherapy for mobility limitations following TBI were recruited. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: Walking speed (self-selected and fast), APG, and a summed single-leg stance scores were measured. The ability to increase walking speed on demand by 0.20 m/s or more defined WSR. Correlations, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to investigate independent relationships between WSR, APG, and static balance. RESULTS: Fifty participants (54.3%) had a WSR of 0.20 m/s or more. The strongest predictor of WSR was APG (odds ratio [OR] = 3.34; 95% CI, 1.50-7.43) when compared with static balance (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06). The ROC curve demonstrated that APG could accurately discriminate between individuals with a WSR from those without (AUC [area under the ROC curve] = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.88). The APG cutoff score identified on the curve that maximized combined sensitivity (92.0%) and specificity (54.8%) was 0.75 W/kg. CONCLUSION: Following TBI, APG was a stronger predictor of WSR than static balance. Clinicians should consider interventions that preferentially target APG in order to increase WSR for community mobility.

Assessment of upper limb abnormalities using the Kinect: Reliability, validity and detection accuracy in people living with acquired brain injury.

Upper limb kinematic abnormalities are prevalent in people with acquired brain injury (ABI). We examined if the Microsoft Kinect for Xbox One (Kinect) reliably (test-retest) and validly (concurrent) quantifies upper limb kinematics, and accurately classifies abnormalities (sensitivity/specificity), in an ABI cohort when compared to three-dimensional motion analysis (3DMA) and a subjective rating scale. We compared 42 adults with ABI to 36 healthy control (HC) participants. Walking trials were recorded by 3DMA and Kinect at self-selected (SSWS) and fast (FWS) walking speeds. When classifying abnormalities for 3DMA and Kinect, a 95% reference range (based on HC data) was calculated using the Kinematic Deviation Score worst axis (KDSw); values outside of this range were classified abnormal. Scores ≥ 2 in the subjective rating scale, based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework's Qualifiers Scale, were considered abnormal. Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity were determined using intra-class correlation coefficient (Absolute ICC2,1) and Pearson's or Spearman's correlation respectively. Fisher's Exact Test was conducted to determine sensitivity and specificity between each combination of the two methods. Strong test-retest reliability was observed for 3DMA (median(IQR) ICC:0.86(0.85-0.90)). Kinect showed overall strong SSWS test-retest reliability (ICC:0.87(0.84-0.91)) and moderate FWS test-retest reliability (ICC:0.61(0.56-0.65)). Concurrent validity between 3DMA and Kinect was overall moderate. Sensitivity and specificity between 3DMA, Kinect and subjective scores were overall modest. Our results suggest caution should be used if implementing Kinect as its validity is modest against criterion-reference 3DMA; however, given its reliability and similar sensitivity/specificity to 3DMA further responsiveness research is warranted.

Clinical spasticity assessment using the Modified Tardieu Scale does not reflect joint angular velocity or range of motion during walking: Assessment tool implications.

OBJECTIVE: Spasticity assessment is often used to guide treatment decision-making. Assessment tool limitations may influence the conflicting evidence surrounding the relationship between spasticity and walking. This study investigated whether testing speeds and joint angles during a Modified Tardieu assessment matched lower-limb angular velocity and range of motion during walking. DESIGN: Observational study. SUBJECTS: Thirty-five adults with a neurological condition and 34 assessors. METHODS: The Modified Tardieu Scale was completed. Joint angles and peak testing speed during V3 (fast) trials were compared with these variables during walking in healthy people, at 0.400.59, 0.600.79 and 1.401.60 m/s. The proportion of trials in which the testing speed, start angle, and angle of muscle reaction matched the relevant joint angles and angular velocity during walking were analysed. RESULTS: The Modified Tardieu Scale was completed faster than the angular velocities seen during walking in 88.7% (0.400.59 m/s), 78.9% (0.600.79 m/s) and 56.2% (1.401.60 m/s) of trials. When compared with the normative dataset, 4.2%, 9.5% and 13.7% of the trials met all criteria for each respective walking speed. CONCLUSION: When applied according to the standardized procedure and compared with joint angular velocity during walking, clinicians performed the Modified Tardieu Scale too quickly.

The nature and extent of upper limb associated reactions during walking in people with acquired brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Upper limb associated reactions (ARs) are common in people with acquired brain injury (ABI). Despite this, there is no gold-standard outcome measure and no kinematic description of this movement disorder. The aim of this study was to determine the upper limb kinematic variables most frequently affected by ARs in people with ABI compared with a healthy cohort at matched walking speed intention. METHODS: A convenience sample of 36 healthy control adults (HCs) and 42 people with ABI who had upper limb ARs during walking were recruited and underwent assessment of their self-selected walking speed using the criterion-reference three dimensional motion analysis (3DMA) at Epworth Hospital, Melbourne. Shoulder flexion, abduction and rotation, elbow flexion, forearm rotation and wrist flexion were assessed. The mean angle, standard deviation (SD), peak joint angles and total joint angle range of motion (ROM) were calculated for each axis across the gait cycle. On a group level, ANCOVA was used to assess the between-group differences for each upper limb kinematic outcome variable. To quantify abnormality prevalence on an individual participant level, the percentage of ABI participants that were outside of the 95% confidence interval of the HC sample for each variable were calculated. RESULTS: There were significant between-group differences for all elbow and shoulder abduction outcome variables (p < 0.01), most shoulder flexion variables (except for shoulder extension peak), forearm rotation SD and ROM and for wrist flexion ROM. Elbow flexion and shoulder abduction were the axes most frequently affected by ARs. Despite the elbow being the most prevalently affected (38/42, 90%), a large proportion of participants had abnormality, defined as ±1.96 SD of the HC mean, present at the shoulder (32/42, 76%), forearm (20/42, 48%) and wrist joints (10/42, 24%). CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable information on ARs, and highlights the need for clinical assessment of ARs to include all of the major joints of the upper limb. This may inform the development of a criterion-reference outcome measure or classification system specific to ARs.

Toward Accurate Clinical Spasticity Assessment: Validation of Movement Speed and Joint Angle Assessments Using Smartphones and Camera Tracking.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a three-dimensional (3-D) camera (Microsoft Kinect) and a smartphone can be used to accurately quantify the joint angular velocity and range of motion (ROM) compared to a criterion-standard 3-D motion analysis system during a lower limb spasticity assessment. DESIGN: Observational, criterion-standard comparison study. SETTING: Large rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 35 controls, 35 patients with a neurologic condition, and 34 rehabilitation professionals (physiotherapists and rehabilitation doctors) participated (N=104). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Modified Tardieu Scale was used to assess spasticity of the quadriceps, hamstrings, soleus, and gastrocnemius. Data for each trial were collected concurrently using the criterion-standard Optitrack 3-D motion analysis (3DMA) system, Microsoft Kinect, and a smartphone. Each healthy control participant was assessed by 1 health professional and each patient with a neurological condition was assessed by 3 health professionals. Spearman correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% confidence intervals were used to report the strength of the relationships investigated. RESULTS: The smartphone and Microsoft Kinect demonstrated excellent concurrent validity with the 3DMA system. Overall, 74.8% of the relationships investigated demonstrated a very strong (≥0.80) correlation across all of the testing parameters. The Microsoft Kinect was superior to the smartphone for measuring joint start and end angle, the smartphone was superior for measuring joint angular velocity, and the 2 systems were comparable for measuring total joint ROM. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide preliminary evidence that user-friendly, low-cost technologies can be used to facilitate accurate measurements of joint angular velocity and angles during a lower limb spasticity assessment in a clinical setting.

Inter- and intra-rater variability of testing velocity when assessing lower limb spasticity.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the variability of fast testing velocity and joint range of motion and position when assessing lower-limb spasticity in individuals following neurological injury. DESIGN: Observational study of people with lower-limb spasticity. SUBJECTS: Patients with an upper motor neurone lesion (n = 35) and clinicians experienced in spasticity assessment (n = 34) were included. METHODS: The Modified Tardieu scale (MTS) was completed on the quadriceps, hamstrings (2 positions), gastrocnemius and soleus for each participant's more affected lower limb by 3 assessors. Mean absolute differences (MADs) were used to calculate variability as a measure of reliability. RESULTS: Variability of peak testing velocity was greater at the ankle joint compared with the knee joint. The greatest MAD for V3 (fast) inter-rater testing velocity was 119°/s in the soleus, representing 29.4% of the mean variable value, and least for the quadriceps (64.3°/s; 18.5%). Inter-rater variability was higher than intra-rater variability for all testing parameters. The MAD for joint end angle ranged from 2.6° to 10.7° and joint start angle from 1.2° to 14.4°. CONCLUSION: There was a large degree of inter- and intra-rater variability in V3 testing velocity when using the MTS to assess lower limb spasticity. The inter-rater variability was approximately double the intra-rater variability.

Lower limb angular velocity during walking at various speeds.

BACKGROUND: Although it is well established that lower limb joint angles adapt to walking at various speeds, limited research has examined the modifications in joint angular velocity. There is currently no normative dataset for joint angular velocity during walking, which would be useful to allow comparisons for patient cohorts. Additionally, understanding normal joint angular velocity may assist clinical assessment and treatment procedures to incorporate methods that replicate the movement speed of the lower limb joints during walking. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to examine lower limb joint angles and angular velocities in a healthy population walking at various gait speeds. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy adult participants underwent three-dimensional gait analysis while walking at various speeds during habitual and slowed walking. The peak joint angles and angular velocities during important phases of the gait cycle were examined for the hip, knee and ankle in the sagittal plane. Data were grouped in 0.2 m/s increments from a walking speed of 0.4 m/s to 1.6 m/s to represent the range of walking speeds reported in studies of people with gait impairments. RESULTS: For joint angles and angular velocities, the shape of the gait traces were consistent regardless of the walking speed. However as walking speed increased, so did the peak joint angles and angular velocities for the hip, knee and ankle. The largest angular velocity occurred when the knee joint extended at the terminal swing phase of gait. For the ankle and hip joints, the largest angular velocity occurred during the push-off phase. SIGNIFICANCE: This study examined how lower limb joint angular velocities change with various walking speeds. These data can be used as a comparator for data from clinical cohorts, and has the potential to be used to match clinical assessment and treatment methods to joint angular velocity during walking.

Do clinical tests of spasticity accurately reflect muscle function during walking: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to establish the ecological validity of clinical tests of lower limb spasticity by determining whether the range of motion (ROM) and speed of limb movement during the assessment accurately replicate muscle function and joint biomechanics during walking. METHODS: An electronic search of ten databases was performed to identify all relevant articles. The reference lists of all included articles were also searched. Identification of relevant articles, data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the review. The Modified Ashworth Scale was the most commonly used clinical measure of lower limb spasticity. The ROM and speed of assessment were poorly reported for clinical scales of lower limb spasticity, making it difficult to draw conclusions regarding the relevance of these scales to walking performance. CONCLUSIONS: The ecological validity of the clinical scales of spasticity could not be determined as studies did not adequately report their testing procedure. Further research into the ecological validity of clinical scales of spasticity is required in order to better understand the impact that spasticity has on functional activities such as walking.

Ankle plantarflexor spasticity is not differentially disabling for those who are weak following traumatic brain injury.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of distal lower-limb spasticity had a greater impact on mobility for those who had greater levels of muscle paresis following traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional cohort study of convenience. Seventy-five people attending physiotherapy for mobility limitations following TBI participated in this study. All participants had sustained a moderate-severe TBI and were grouped according to the presence or absence of ankle plantarflexor spasticity for comparison. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The primary outcome measure for mobility was self-selected walking speed and the primary outcome measure for muscle strength was hand-held dynamometry. Secondary outcome measures for mobility and muscle strength were the High-level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) and ankle power generation (APG) at push-off. Spasticity was quantified with the Modified Tardieu scale. Participants with ankle plantarflexor spasticity (Group 2) had slower self-selected walking speeds. There was no statistically significant effect for Group and plantarflexor strength (p = 0.81). CONCLUSION: Although participants with ankle plantarflexor spasticity walked significantly slower than those without, the presence of ankle plantarflexor spasticity did not lead to greater mobility limitations for those who were weak.

Ankle Plantarflexor Spasticity Does Not Restrict the Recovery of Ankle Plantarflexor Strength or Ankle Power Generation for Push-Off During Walking Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this project was to determine the impact of plantarflexor spasticity on muscle performance for ambulant people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING: A large metropolitan rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two ambulant people with TBI who were attending physiotherapy for mobility limitations. Twenty-four participants returned for a 6-month follow-up reassessment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. MAIN MEASURES: Self-selected walking speed, Tardieu scale, ankle plantarflexor strength, and ankle power generation (APG). RESULTS: Participants with ankle plantarflexor spasticity had significantly lower self-selected walking speed; however, there was no significant difference in ankle plantarflexor strength or APG. Participants with ankle plantarflexor spasticity were not restricted in the recovery of self-selected walking speed, ankle plantarflexor strength, or APG, indicating equivalent ability to improve their mobility over time despite the presence of spasticity. CONCLUSION: Following TBI, people with ankle plantarflexor spasticity have significantly greater mobility limitations than those without spasticity, yet retain the capacity for recovery of self-selected walking speed, ankle plantarflexor strength, and APG.

Severity and distribution of spasticity does not limit mobility or influence compensatory strategies following traumatic brain injury.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the severity of lower limb spasticity had a differential effect on mobility following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to investigate whether the distribution of lower limb spasticity influenced compensation strategies when walking. RESEARCH DESIGN: Ninety-three people attending physiotherapy for mobility limitations following TBI participated in this study. Participants were grouped according to the presence and distribution of lower limb spasticity for comparison. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Mobility was measured using a 10-metre walk test and the high level mobility assessment tool. Three dimensional gait analysis was used to measure power generation and spasticity was assessed using the Tardieu scale. No significant relationship was found between the severity of lower limb spasticity and mobility limitations. There was a strong relationship between ankle power generation and mobility performance. Proximal compensation strategies did not vary significantly between groups with different distributions of lower limb spasticity. CONCLUSION: The ability to generate ankle power has a large impact on mobility outcome following TBI. Although spasticity was prevalent, the severity and distribution did not appear to impact mobility outcomes. Proximal compensation strategies were not influenced by the distribution of lower limb spasticity following TBI.

The effectiveness of therapy on outcome following (BoNT-A) injection for focal spasticity in adults with neurological conditions: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the independent effectiveness of adjunctive therapies when provided in conjunction with botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT-A) injection for focal spasticity in adults with neurological conditions. DATA SOURCES: Nine electronic databases. STUDY SELECTION: A systematic search was performed to identify randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the benefit of adjunctive therapies following BoNT-A injection. DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS: Two authors extracted the data independently. Each trial was assessed for internal validity and rated for quality using the PEDro scale. Articles were further appraised using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) evidence classification to construct concise clinical recommendations. RESULTS: The search identified 12 studies that reported on the effects of eight different adjunctive therapies following BoNT-A injection in adults with focal spasticity. No high level evidence was identified. The mean PEDro score for the 12 studies was 5.6 (SD = 1.6) and the clinical recommendations provided were Grade U, indicating the effectiveness of the adjunctive therapies was unknown or unproven. CONCLUSION: There was insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of any of the commonly prescribed adjunctive therapies following BoNT-A injection for focal spasticity in adults.

Distribution of Lower Limb Spasticity Does Not Influence Mobility Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between lower limb spasticity and mobility limitations following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and determine the influence of spasticity distribution on mobility outcomes following TBI. SETTING: A large metropolitan rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-three ambulant people with TBI who were attending physiotherapy for mobility limitations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. MAIN MEASURES: The High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool, gait velocity, and the Tardieu scale. RESULTS: Lower limb spasticity was common following TBI, with a distal distribution being the most prevalent. Participants with spasticity had significantly greater initial mobility limitations than participants without spasticity. However, the distribution of lower limb spasticity and the presence of unilateral or bilateral spasticity had no additional impact on mobility outcomes. There was no significant difference in mobility outcomes at the 6-month follow-up for people with spasticity, indicating that individuals have equivalent ability to improve their mobility over time despite the presence of spasticity. CONCLUSION: Following TBI, people with lower limb spasticity have significantly greater mobility limitations than those without spasticity, yet the presence and distribution of spasticity does not appear to impact mobility outcomes. There is long-term potential to improve mobility despite the presence of spasticity.