Cervical Alignment of Patients with Basilar Invagination: A Radiological Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cervical alignment and the relative range of motion (ROM) in patients with basilar invagination (BI). METHODS: A total of 40 BI cases (38.1 years old ± 17.9 years old, 19 male and 21 female) and 80 asymptomatic individuals (33.8 years old ± 10.8 years old, 40 male and 40 female) were included. The Skull-C2 /Skull-BV, Skull-C7 , C2 -C7 /BV-C7 wall angles, C0 -C2 /C0 -BV, C0 -C7 , C1 -C7 , and C2 -C7 /BV-C7 angles were measured in dynamic X-ray images (including neutral, extension, and flexion positions). Correlation between the upper and lower cervical curvatures were analyzed. The total, extension, and flexion ROMs of these angles were calculated, respectively. RESULTS: The BI patients had a smaller C0 -C2 /C0 -BV angle (18.2° ± 16.4° vs 30.9° ± 9.3°), but larger C2 -C7 /BV-C7 (32.2° ± 16.1° vs 19.4° ± 10.6°) and C2 -C7 /BV-C7 wall angles (37.8° ± 17.2° vs 23.6° ± 10.2°) than the control group in neutral position. The upper and lower curvatures correlated negatively in neutral (r = -0.371), extension (r = -0.429), and flexion (r = -0.648) positions among BI patients, as well as in extension position (r = -0.317) among control group. The BI patients presented smaller total ROMs in Skull-C2 /Skull-BV (12.3° ± 16.6° vs 19.7° ± 10.9°), C0 -C2 /C0 -BV (8.1° ± 11.1° vs 17.6° ± 10.5°), and C0 -C7 angles (57.8° ± 14.2° vs 78.3° ± 17.9°), but a larger total ROM in C2 -C7 /BV-C7 wall angle (52.8° ± 13.9° vs 27.0° ± 16.1°) than the control group. The BI patients also presented smaller extension ROMs in Skull-C2 /Skull-BV (6.9° ± 9.4° vs 12.5° ± 9.3°), Skull-C7 (24.5° ± 10.9° vs 30.7° ± 12.5°), and C0 -C2 /C0 -BV angles (4.4° ± 7.8° vs 9.9° ± 8.6°) than the control group. Moreover, the BI patients showed smaller absolute values of flexion ROMs in Skull-C2 /Skull-BV (-5.2° ± 9.4° vs -7.3° ± 8.0°), C0 -C2 /C0 -BV (-3.2° ± 8.8° vs -7.7° ± 8.7°), and C0 -C7 angles (-33.2° ± 13.0° vs -52.8° ± 19.2°), but a larger absolute value of flexion ROM in C2 -C7 /BV-C7 wall angle (-33.9° ± 14.8° vs -8.2° ± 15.1°). CONCLUSION: The cervical spine was stiffer in BI patients than the asymptomatic individuals, especially in the upper cervical curvature. The negative correlation between upper and lower cervical curvatures was more obvious in BI patients.

Morphological Evaluation of the Subaxial Cervical Spine in Patients with Basilar Invagination: A CT-based Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphologic features of the subaixal cervical spine in patients with basilar invagination (BI) and provide information for the accurate screw placement in this region. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: BI is a congenital anomaly, comprising a wide range of abnormal structures. The screw fixation can be required in situation that BI is combined with subaxial cervical spine pathologies. However, there are no literatures specifically addressed the subaxial cervical morphology of BI. METHOD: A total of 42 BI patients were included in this retrospective study. Forty-two patients without head or cervical disease were matched for sexes and ages. Information on radiographic features of the subaxial cervical spine was collected and compared systematically. RESULTS: There were no differences in the age and sex between the BI and control group. The BI group manifested a wider pedicle and laminar than the control group at all cervical levels, except for the pedicle of C6 and C7, and the laminar of C3 and C6. In addition, the BI group had a wider lateral mass from C3 to C5 than the control group. There were no differences in most measurements of the length of pedicle, laminar, and lateral mass. CONCLUSION: BI patients have a wider pedicle and laminar than the general population in the subaxial cervical spine, but the same size in length of pedicle, laminar, and lateral mass.Level of Evidence: 4.

Anatomical analysis of the occipital bone in patients with basilar invagination: a computed tomography-based study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The occipital bone is often involved in the surgical treatment of basilar invagination (BI). However, the anatomy of the occipital bone associated with BI patients has yet to be investigated. PURPOSE: To present a morphological map of the occipital bone in BI patients and help guide screw placement for occipitocervical fusion. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. METHODS: Radiological measurements of the occipital bone were performed on computed tomography images based on a matrix of 99 points centered around the external occipital protuberance (EOP) in a cohort of 50 BI patients and 50 cases with no head and cervical disease. The comparison between the BI group and the control group was assessed using Student t analysis and p<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: All thicknesses measured from points of the matrix in the BI group were thinner than those in the control group (p<.05). The maximum thicknesses in both groups were located at the center of the EOP, which were 15.11±2.84 mm in the BI group and 17.56±3.03 mm in the control group, respectively. Additionally, thickness decreased with the distance away from the center of EOP. CONCLUSIONS: The occipital bone in BI patients is thinner than that in the general population. A limited safe zone in BI patients is available for surgeons to place screws, which may need to be fully evaluated before operation.