[Clinical significance of serum HBsAg levels, HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio, and association with liver inflammation activity in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B].

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical significance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels and HBsAg/hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA ratio in relation to liver inflammation in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: One hundred and fifty-three Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection with HBeAg-positive status were enrolled in the study.Quantitative measurements were made for HBsAg levels by immunoassay (Architect HBsAg QT by Abbott Diagnostic) and HBV DNA by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR.Levels of liver function markers were measured by standard methods.Liver biopsy specimens were obtained from all patients and used to score the histology (liver inflammation) activity index (HAI) and grade (G) the extent of necroinflammation.Statistical correlation analysis was performed to determine the association of HBsAg titre or HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio with the various parameters of liver injury. RESULTS: HBsAg titre and HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio were significantly correlated (r =0.578, P less than 0.0001).A significant positive correlation (r =0.642, P less than 0.0001) was found between HBsAg titre and HBV DNA load, and a significant negative correlation was found between the HAI and HBsAg (r =-0.389, P less than 0.0001) and HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio (r =-0.307, P=0.000l).A significant positive correlation was found between alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and the HAI (r =0.480, P less than 0.0001).Patients with G less than 2 necroinflammation had significantly higher HBsAg titre and HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio than patients with G more than or equal to 2 necroinflammation (both P less than 0.01) but similar levels ofHBV DNA.Generation of a receiver operating characteristic curve using G more than or equal to 2 as the positive index provided the following area under the curve (AUC) values:HBsAg titre, 0.700; HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio, 0.672; ALT level, 0.713.When the random chance AUC was 0.5, all levels of AUC were statistically significant (Pless than 0.001).HBsAg titre (sensitivity =76.92%) was more sensitive than ALT level (sensitivity =76.92%), and HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio (specificity =81.33%) was more specific than ALT level (specificity =81.33%).Youden's index for comprehensive evaluation using ALT was higher than those for HBsAg titre or HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio.When HBsAg and ALT were considered in parallel, the sensitivity increased to 94.08% and specificity rose to 85.60%. CONCLUSION: HBsAg titre, HBsAg/HBV DNA ratio and ALT levels can be used as the index for judging the degree of liver inflammation in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.Higher sensitivity and specificity are attained when HBsAg and ALT are used in series or parallel.

Baseline HBsAg predicts response to pegylated interferon-α2b in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients.

AIM: To evaluate the predictive effect of baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) on response to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-α2b in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared the treatment efficacy of PEG-IFN-α2b alone in 55 HBeAg-positive CHB patients with different baseline HBsAg levels. Serum HBV DNA load was measured at baseline, and at 12, 24 and 48 wk of therapy. Virological response was defined as HBV DNA < 1000 IU/mL. Serum HBsAg titers were quantitatively assayed at baseline, and at 12 and 24 wk. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had baseline HBsAg > 20 000 IU/mL, 26 patients had 1500-20000 IU/mL, and 11 patients had < 1500 IU/mL. Three (16.7%), 11 (42.3%) and seven (63.6%) patients in each group achieved a virological response at week 48, with a significant difference between groups with baseline HBsAg levels > 20000 or < 20000 IU/mL (P = 0.02). Thirteen patients had an HBsAg decline > 0.5 log10 and 30 patients < 0.5 log10 at week 12; and 6 (46.2%) and 10 (33.3%) in each group achieved virological response at week 48, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.502). Eighteen patients had an HBsAg decline > 1.0 log10 and 30 patients < 1.0 log10 at week 24, and 8 (44.4%) and 11 (36.7%) achieved a virological response at week 48, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.762). None of the 16 patients with HBsAg > 20000 IU/mL at week 24 achieved a virological response at week 48. CONCLUSION: Baseline HBsAg level in combination with HBV DNA may become an effective predictor for guiding optimal therapy with PEG-IFN-α2b against HBeAg-positive CHB.