Impact of hyponatremia in patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine units: Hyponatremia in Internal Medicine units.

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact and the clinical and evolutionary characteristics of hypotonic hyponatremia in patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine units. Prospective multicenter observational study of patients with hypotonic hyponatremia (<135 mmol/L) in 5 hospitals in southern Spain. Patients were included according to point prevalence studies carried out every 2 weeks between March 2015 and October 2017, by assessing demographic, clinical, analytical, and management data; each patient was subsequently followed up for 12 months, during which time mortality and readmissions were assessed. A total of 501 patients were included (51.9% women, mean age = 71.3 ±â€…14.24 years), resulting in an overall prevalence of hyponatremia of 8.3%. The mean comorbidities rate was 4.50 ±â€…2.41, the most frequent diagnoses being heart failure (115) (23%), respiratory infections (65) (13%), and oncological pathologies (42) (6.4%). Of the total number of hyponatremia cases, 180 (35.9%) were hypervolemic, 164 (32.7%) hypovolemic, and 157 (31.3%) were euvolemic. A total of 87.4% did not receive additional diagnostic tests to establish the origin of the condition and 30% did not receive any treatment. Hospital mortality was 15.6% and the mean length of stay was 14.7 days. Euvolemic and admission hyponatremia versus hyponatremia developed during admission were significantly associated with lower mortality rates (P = .037). Mortality at 1 year and readmissions were high (31% and 53% of patients, respectively). Hyponatremia was common in Internal Medicine areas, with hypervolemic hyponatremia being the most frequent type. The mortality rate was high during admission and at follow-up; yet there is a margin for improvement in the clinical management of this condition.

A multidisciplinary approach for patients with multiple chronic conditions: IMPACTO study / Plan de asistencia continuada multidisciplinar a pacientes pluripatológicos: estudio IMPACTO

Background and objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary intervention on the outcomes of polypathological patients (PP). Methods: A multicenter quasi-experimental pre-post study with a 12-month follow up was performed. In-hospital, at discharge and outpatient clinics patients who met criteria of PP between March 2012 and October 2013 were included. The multidisciplinary approach was defined by 11 interventions performed by general practitioners, internal medicine physicians, team care nurses and hospital pharmacists. The primary outcome was reduction in the number of hospital admissions and days of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included mortality and the effects of 11 interventions on mortality. Results: 420 patients were included. Mean patient age was 77.3 (SD: 8.90) and average number of PP defining categories was 2.99 (SD: 1.00). Number of hospital admissions and days of hospitalization decreased significantly after intervention: 1.52 (SD: 1.35) versus 0.82 (SD: 1.29), p<0.001, and 13.77 (SD: 15.20) versus 7.21 (SD: 12.90), p<0.001 respectively. 12-month mortality was 37.7%. PP who failed to receive a structured medical visit from the internal medicine physician and educational workshops from the team care nurses had a higher risk of exitus in the next 12 months, HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.15-2.46, p=0.007 and HR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.92-4.27, p<0.001, respectively. Conclusions: This multidisciplinary intervention reduced the risk of PP hospital admission and days of hospitalization. Educational workshop programs for PP and their caregivers and structured IM medical visits were associated with improvements of survival

Introducción y objetivo: El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar los resultados en salud tras la implantación de una intervención multidisciplinar a pacientes pluripatológicos (PP). Metodología: Se realizó un estudio multicéntrico antes-después cuasi-experimental, con seguimiento a 12 meses. Se incluyeron pacientes que cumplían los criterios de PP entre marzo de 2012 y octubre de 2013, tanto en el ámbito hospitalario como en atención primaria. El enfoque multidisciplinar fue definido por 11 intervenciones realizadas por médicos de familia, médicos internistas, enfermeras y farmacéuticos hospitalarios. El resultado fundamental fue la reducción en el número de ingresos hospitalarios y días de hospitalización al año de seguimiento. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la mortalidad y los efectos de las intervenciones sobre la misma. Resultados: Se incluyeron 420 pacientes. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 77,3 (DE: 8,90) y la media de categorías definitorias de PP fue de 2,99 (DE: 1,00). El número de ingresos hospitalarios y los días de hospitalización disminuyeron significativamente después de la intervención: 1,52 (DE: 1,35) versus 0,82 (DE: 1,29), p<0,001 y 13,77 (DE: 15,20) versus 7,21 (DE: 12,90), p<0,001, respectivamente. La mortalidad a los 12 meses fue del 37,7%. Los PP que no recibieron la visita médica estructurada del médico internista tras la inclusión y los talleres educativos de las enfermeras tuvieron un mayor riesgo de exitus en los 12 meses de seguimiento, HR: 1,68; IC del 95%: 1,15-2,46, p=0,007 y HR: 2,86; IC del 95%: 1,92-4,27, p<0,001, respectivamente. Conclusiones: Esta intervención multidisciplinaria reduce el riesgo de ingreso y los días de ingreso hospitalario en PP. Los programas de talleres educativos para PP y sus cuidadores, y las visitas médicas estructuradas por parte de medicina interna se asociaron con una mayor supervivencia

A multidisciplinary approach for patients with multiple chronic conditions: IMPACTO study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary intervention on the outcomes of polypathological patients (PP). METHODS: A multicenter quasi-experimental pre-post study with a 12-month follow up was performed. In-hospital, at discharge and outpatient clinics patients who met criteria of PP between March 2012 and October 2013 were included. The multidisciplinary approach was defined by 11 interventions performed by general practitioners, internal medicine physicians, team care nurses and hospital pharmacists. The primary outcome was reduction in the number of hospital admissions and days of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included mortality and the effects of 11 interventions on mortality. RESULTS: 420 patients were included. Mean patient age was 77.3 (SD: 8.90) and average number of PP defining categories was 2.99 (SD: 1.00). Number of hospital admissions and days of hospitalization decreased significantly after intervention: 1.52 (SD: 1.35) versus 0.82 (SD: 1.29), p<0.001, and 13.77 (SD: 15.20) versus 7.21 (SD: 12.90), p<0.001 respectively. 12-month mortality was 37.7%. PP who failed to receive a structured medical visit from the internal medicine physician and educational workshops from the team care nurses had a higher risk of exitus in the next 12 months, HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.15-2.46, p=0.007 and HR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.92-4.27, p<0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary intervention reduced the risk of PP hospital admission and days of hospitalization. Educational workshop programs for PP and their caregivers and structured IM medical visits were associated with improvements of survival.

Neumonía intersticial bilateral recidivante en un paciente con infección por el VIH / Recurrent bilateral interstitial pneumonia in an HIV-infected patient

No disponible

[Clinical and immunological features in 112 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome]. / Manifestaciones clínicas y alteraciones inmunológicas en pacientes con síndrome antifosfolipídico. Presentación de 112 casos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We decided to describe the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of a series of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (Harris criteria) and review other Spanish published series. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We describe 112 patients with APS, 50 primary (PAPS) and 62 secondary (SAPS) -56 (90%) to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-, monitorized in two referral centers in Malaga (Spain) from 1989 to 2000. All data were obtained from the medical records by means of a protocol. RESULTS: The age was similar in both groups (42.3 [14.7] years for the whole series). Patients with SAPS had an earlier onset of the disease (29.6 [12.6] years, vs 37.0 [13.9] years in PAPS) and they had a longer evolution of the disease (143.3 [115.5] months, vs 83.5 [73.5] months in PAPS). There was a female predominance (84% and 60% in SAPS and PAPS, respectively). The prevalences of arterial (43%) and venous thrombosis (39%), fetal loss (40%), premature births (9%), anticardiolipin antibodies (88%) and lupus anticoagulant (54%) were similar in both groups. The prevalence of ANA-IFI, thrombocytopenia and autoimmune anemia was higher in SAPS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAPS and SAPS did not present any differences in the clinical manifestations and immunological disorders of the syndrome. Those patients with SAPS were younger at the beginning of the disease and there was a female predominance. Our patients were different from those included in other Spanish published series, which could be explained by selection and classification bias.