Chronic constipation: from pathophysiology to management.

Chronic constipation (CC) is one of the most common conditions found in gastrointestinal clinical practice and defined by the presence of fewer than 3 bowel movements per week and/or more than one fourth of bowel movements with Bristol stool form types 1 or 2. CC affects people regardless of race, age, or sex, although it is most common in women and in elderly. It is associated with relevant disease burden, including significant impairment of patients' quality of life. In the absence of alarm features, patients should receive a symptom-based diagnosis. Treatment options include lifestyle and general measures, bulking agents, in particular dietary fiber supplementation. Osmotic laxatives are currently considered the first-line gold-standard pharmacological treatment of CC together with stimulant laxatives which are often used as a rescue therapy. When necessary, prokinetic agents and/or intestinal secretagogues can be used. Biofeedback may be indicated in patients with functional defecation disorders. In this review, we will briefly summarize the current understanding on epidemiology, classification, pathophysiology and clinical evaluation of CC and discuss in depth the pharmacological and not pharmacological management of patients with this disorder.

Diagnostic challenges of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease.

Colonic diverticulosis is a common condition in Western industrialized countries occurring in up to 65% of people over the age of 60 years. Only a minority of these subjects (about 10-25%) experience symptoms, fulfilling Rome III Diagnostic Criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) diagnosis (IBS-like symptoms) in 10% to 66% of cases. Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a syndrome characterized by recurrent abdominal symptoms attributed to diverticula in the absence of macroscopically evident alterations other than the presence of diverticula. Due to the different peak of incidence, the overlap between SUDD and IBS is predominantly present in middle-aged or older patients. In these cases, it is very complex to establish if the symptoms are related to the presence of diverticula or due to an overlapping IBS. In fact, the link between gastrointestinal symptoms and diverticula is unclear, and the mechanism by which diverticula may induce the development of IBS-like symptoms remains to be elucidated. Currently, the etiology and pathophysiology of SUDD, particularly when IBS-like symptoms are present, are not completely understood, and thus these two entities remain a diagnostic challenge not only for the general practitioner but also for the gastroenterologist. Although many issues remain open and unresolved, some minimize the importance of a distinction of these two entities as dietary and pharmacological management may be largely overlapping.

Treatment of Diverticular Disease With Aminosalicylates: The Evidence.

Colonic diverticulosis is an increasingly common condition in Western industrialized countries. About 20% of patients develop symptoms, including abdominal pain, bloating, changes in bowel habits, and, eventually, diverticulitis or other complications. The management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) and the prevention of acute diverticulitis remains a challenge for the clinician. The rationale for the use of aminosalicylates, such as mesalazine, is based on the assumption of low-grade inflammation in SUDD and symptoms generation, whereas an overt inflammation may induce diverticulitis in patients with diverticular disease. Clinical scenarios in which the efficacy and safety of mesalazine have been studied include SUDD, prevention of diverticulitis, and of recurrent diverticulitis. Data from uncontrolled studies suggest a benefit of mesalazine on patients with SUDD, whereas data from randomized controlled trials showed some evidence of improvement of symptoms, although contrasting results are reported. The largest study so far published on the efficacy of mesalamine in the prevention of recurrence of diverticulitis showed that mesalamine was not superior to placebo. At this time, the role of mesalazine in the prevention of acute diverticulitis remains to be defined with many issues open and unresolved.